Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds
NewScientist.com ^ | October 27, 2001 | Jeff Hecht

Posted on 10/27/2001 5:31:37 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy

Tests of a controversial weapon that is designed to heat people's skin with a microwave beam have shown that it can disperse crowds. But critics are not convinced the system is safe.

Last week, the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in New Mexico finished testing the system on human volunteers. The Air Force now wants to use this Active Denial Technology (ADT), which it says is non-lethal, for peacekeeping or riot control at "relatively long range" - possibly from low-flying aircraft.

ADT uses a 2-metre dish to create a narrow beam of microwaves that can be scanned across a crowd or even aimed at individuals. AFRL is using infrared photography to analyse the heating effect on the volunteers' bodies.

AFRL says that the 3-millimetre wavelength radiation penetrates only 0.3 millimetres into the skin, rapidly heating the surface above the 45 °C pain threshold. At 50 °C, they say the pain reflex makes people pull away automatically in less than a second - it's said to feel like fleetingly touching a hot light bulb. Someone would have to stay in the beam for 250 seconds before it burnt the skin, the lab says, giving "ample margin between intolerable pain and causing a burn".

Little data

But critics question the AFRL's claims that the weapon's undisclosed exposure levels are safe. John Pike of think tank Globalsecurity.org fears that the beam power needed to scare people may be too close to the level that would injure them. Air Force scientists helped set the present skin safety threshold of 10 milliwatts per square centimetre in the early 1990s, when little data was available, says Louis Slesin, editor of Microwave News.

That limit covers exposure to steady fields for several minutes to an hour - but heating a layer of skin 0.3 mm thick to 50 °C in just one second requires much higher power and may pose risks to the cornea, which is more sensitive than skin. A study published last year in the journal Health Physics showed that exposure to 2 watts per square centimetre for three seconds could damage the corneas of rhesus monkeys.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
So who would be stupid enough to stare into the thing while they are getting zapped?
1 posted on 10/27/2001 5:31:37 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Does it work in caves?
2 posted on 10/27/2001 5:35:59 PM PDT by isthisnickcool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Lord help you if you've got a package of microwave popcorn in your pocket.
3 posted on 10/27/2001 5:38:09 PM PDT by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Shield yourself with your tin foil hat.
4 posted on 10/27/2001 5:41:12 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
I remember 30 years ago when my mom was "injured" by this technology.

Back then it was called a "Sun Lamp".

5 posted on 10/27/2001 5:42:37 PM PDT by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
troops usually get a chilly reception when confronting demonstrators. Now just set all weapons to DEFROST.
6 posted on 10/27/2001 5:45:26 PM PDT by Newbomb Turk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdittmar
Isn't trying to use somethinglike that on a crowd basically asking to get shot?
7 posted on 10/27/2001 5:45:39 PM PDT by Anotherpundit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: scooter2
Lord help you if you've got a package of microwave popcorn in your pocket.

ROFLMAO! I say to heck with the critics, increase the beam intensity to level 10 and explode their heads....

8 posted on 10/27/2001 5:47:14 PM PDT by Enlightiator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Cool.
9 posted on 10/27/2001 5:48:21 PM PDT by Hemlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Will your nuts explode if they set it on high?
10 posted on 10/27/2001 5:49:45 PM PDT by Hemlock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
Well, let's try it out on the Taliban front lines.
11 posted on 10/27/2001 5:51:27 PM PDT by Two Thirds Vote Aye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
"So who would be stupid enough to stare into the thing while they are getting zapped?"

You do not have to look at it for it to work....

12 posted on 10/27/2001 5:52:43 PM PDT by jbstrick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jbstrick
Oh no, it may not be safe. Do'h you media jackasses, weapons usually aren't safe. The horror, the horror.
13 posted on 10/27/2001 6:04:02 PM PDT by kingh99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Thornwell Simons
May be aircraft mounted and used on Pakistani rioters if things get out of hand
14 posted on 10/27/2001 6:30:12 PM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: IowaHawk
Packer fans at Lambeau Field in December might actually enjoy this . . .
15 posted on 10/27/2001 9:04:52 PM PDT by BraveMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
So who would be stupid enough to stare into the thing while they are getting zapped?

Microwaves are invisible, you wouldn't necessarily know which direction the thing was coming from. Also you wouldn't need to "stare into the thing" to receive eye damage.

At 50 °C, they say the pain reflex makes people pull away automatically in less than a second - it's said to feel like fleetingly touching a hot light bulb.

Ever touch your eyeball to a hot light bulb(even for a split second)? Ouch!

16 posted on 10/27/2001 9:17:19 PM PDT by ICU812
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy; Cyber Liberty
But does it brown food?
17 posted on 10/29/2001 12:56:56 PM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
I have heard that our defense dept. has created a similar device but used to kill. From what I heard, they say it is too gruesome to use.

Anyone else heard of this.

18 posted on 10/29/2001 1:27:44 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy
I see only one problem with this technology.

Some day the Democrats will regain the White House (hey, a lot of idiots voted for Bubba didn't they?) and Freepers will be considered the protesters.

As long as Dubya is president, I don't see this being abused, but I fear what future administrations may do with it.

19 posted on 10/29/2001 1:31:44 PM PST by LuvItOrLeaveIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #20 Removed by Moderator

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson