Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

********************How do you like WINDOWS XP?********************
From me ^ | 27 Oct 01 | Democrats are liars

Posted on 10/27/2001 11:16:24 AM PDT by Democrats are liars

Well, I just finished installing Windows XP on my computer. It did not go nice and smooth. I ended up reformatting my hard drive and starting from scratch. I know Windows XP sure does not like AOL 6.0. I am in the process of downloading AOL 7.0. I am still installing all my old software. Yes Windows XP locked up on me many times today and last night. Well, I guess I just would like to know how every one else is doing with Windows XP.


TOPICS: Editorial; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-359 next last
To: oc-flyfish
I didn't like the new interface at first, but for the few weeks I've been running it I really like it now.

We have "experience" to over come to understand and appreciate the new way of working. After the first 3 days...I can never imagine going back to the old interface.

Another cool think is that the new interface is skinable. Get windowblinds and you can make it look however you like.

141 posted on 10/27/2001 1:20:48 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Gimme
Yeah it does. You have to search for it though.
142 posted on 10/27/2001 1:22:10 PM PDT by oc-flyfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Democrats are liars
So far XP is great, of course the primary reason it is great is that it is NOT running on ANY machine I own. I intend to keep XP great by keeping it OFF MY SYSTEMS!

Why?

I'm tired of Micro$oft; I'm tired of the bugs, security holes, CONSTANT patches; I'm tired of Micro$oft's heavy handed, predatory, monoplistic business tactics; I'm tired of beta testing Micro$oft Software Bloatware and paying THEM for the privledge; I'm tired of Micro$oft DICTATING to me what software I should use or how I use it, and what it connects to.

I don't like Micro$oft's activation scheme (or is that scam). I change my system around enough (upgrading processors, memory, drives etc.) that I don't want to have to re-activate the OS because Micro$oft has deemed my system changed enough that it might be another system. And I certainally don't like the idea of Micro$oft reading and writing things from and to my system without my knowledge or consent. And while I may not own their software, I KNOW I own the hardware and the data, MY data, contained within it.

I just finished installing Mandrake LINUX 8.1 on a system of mine. The install went flawlessly, and this was a home built system. It has the ability to access servers from UNIX (NFS) Microsoft (9x/NT or SMABA based UNIX boxes), Novell and even MAC. It comes with a photo editor close to Photoshop, an office system as capable as M$ Orafice, games of several types, and development tools for C/C++, to Java, PERL, CGI & HTML. Apache to run a web server, and VNC for remote control of other systems to name just a few.

Total cost? Download time from a web site and three blank, recordable CD-ROM's. Or in other words; basically FREE!

Yep, Windoze 2000 will be the last M$ OS I own (oops, I forgot, we don't own the software we pay for, Micro$oft does) use on any system, and I'm setting things up to drop it altogether at home. Now if I could just get my employer to drop it, we could save MILLION$ in licensing fee's and constant hardware upgrades.

143 posted on 10/27/2001 1:22:51 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImpBill
"Good luck. I was a beta tester and can tell you that I think it is a piece of crap. Oh it is a more stable OS for MS programs. The biggest complaint I have with it, is that it wants to take over all your peripherals. Huge conflicts with programs like Adaptec, HP Scanner programs, PhotoImplant SE and others. There was also problems with my Kodak Digital Camera, but I understand Kodak and MS arrived at a compromise on Kodak software.

Should I purchase a new computer in the near future I will request not to have XP installed. If it is, immediately upon receipt I will reformat with Windows ME. Just my opinion."
 

Wow, someone who likes Widows ME. I did not think anyone liked ME (lol).

Well you tried the BETA -Beta versions always have a lot of bugs don't they? Maybe this final version is a lot better than the previous beta versions?

144 posted on 10/27/2001 1:25:07 PM PDT by Democrats are liars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: kylaka
Windows Me is / was /and will forever be a disaster. I will be done with MS by the end of the year.

You won't get an argument from me about ME. I abandoned the Win 95->98->ME product line years ago in favor of NT->2000->XP.

95/98/ME had pathetic memory management leading to several crashes every day. Essentially, you get what you pay for.

145 posted on 10/27/2001 1:25:43 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
Hi, this is invoman's wife. I'm a network admin for our city. On a personal note, my hubby has an HP PC loaded with Win ME. He's going to reload everything to where it's just a clean PC w/ Win ME, no programs loaded. Is it advisable to upgrade to XP from this type of scenario without any problems? Or would you recommend a dual boot? On the other side of the fence, I'm wary of the XP system, and I run 2000 pro at work without any problems. I'm looking to get another PC at home where I can perform my network duties on an NT network. Does XP Professional log into an NT domain, or should I just stick with purchasing 2000? I appreciate your input, and thank you for your time. Kitt
146 posted on 10/27/2001 1:29:14 PM PDT by invoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
And for copy protection. I say it's about time.

Yeah, time for Microsoft, right?

Microsoft only got to the position they are in right now because they practically gave their OS away to start with. Now that they have virtually eliminated the competition they want some copy right protection to rake in as much profits as they can for as long as they can.

However, what they fail to realize is that they are now in a position for real competition to emerge using the same tactics that let them achieve their near monopoly. Linux is free and its open source code makes developers feel better about developing applications for it. If IBM doesn't screw Linux up, watch for it to become a REAL alternative to Microsoft's OS in the next 5 years.

147 posted on 10/27/2001 1:29:56 PM PDT by RickyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: RickyJ
That sounds fair to me. At least it's competitive forces driving the markets and not the DOJ.
148 posted on 10/27/2001 1:34:32 PM PDT by for-q-clinton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Democrats are liars
Well you tried the BETA -Beta versions always have a lot of bugs don't they? Maybe this final version is a lot better than the previous beta versions?

Well, actually he tried the Alpha version which he still had to pay for. But Alpha testers are limited to 50~100K users. The beta testers are the ones who run out (even camp out the night before) on its official launch and pay for it. You don't get a true release of the software until the 3rd or 4th service pack and numerous other patches. And even then you might not be out of Beta.

149 posted on 10/27/2001 1:35:10 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Chemnitz
"XP and AOL? Wow, you probably own a Compaq computer, too."
 

137 posted on 10/27/01 1:19 PM Pacific by Chemnitz
 

Wow, you seem like a nice person! Thanks for adding to the discussion. Your insight is great!

150 posted on 10/27/2001 1:35:21 PM PDT by Democrats are liars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus
You are right! Average Joes should not buy MACS. Only the more intelligent buy them as they want to avoid all the freezes, failures, crashes and other disasters that make all PCs a continuous joke.

I am a former Mac bigot. At one point I personally owned 22 state-of-the art Macs for my PC software business. We wrote our software for PCs and Unix, but used Macs for sales, marketing, word processing, e-mail, documentation, and accounting. Those were the days when virtually everything Mac was superior to everything PC. That is no longer the case. Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Photoshop, Pagemaker, etc., are as good or better on the PC.

Almost, repeat ALMOST, every PC application is as good or superior to the Mac version or equivalent. Quite simply, I am no longer a believer. I no longer feel compelled to pay a premium price for equivalent hardware and software. Apple lost it's way and will no longer be a player in business, with the exception of the graphics industry.

151 posted on 10/27/2001 1:37:37 PM PDT by Jolly Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: WileyCoyote22
I went thru that very crap a few years back ,Sister Mary Katherine , NEVER again wiley . That is some of the very things I look at when I select an OS . Whether it is Ben proof or not , but to each his own is my motto !
152 posted on 10/27/2001 1:45:31 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Jolly Green
Holy cow ! I read about you guys ! Ok , I also read about when folks would log onto the web and come home from the office , then connect an hour or more after that . I agree , for better or worse it beats the snot out of what the older paradigm was . Dont forget to thank Al Gore for all of his contributions ! ( gag me ) , Big Time . I never liked having to settle for but I value what we have now , and what the future holds for all of us .
153 posted on 10/27/2001 1:59:35 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: invoman
Does XP Professional log into an NT domain, or should I just stick with purchasing 2000? I appreciate your input, and thank you for your time. Kitt

Windows XP is simply an upgrade of Windows 2000. Anyone who buys a new PC from now on will use it unless they go with Mac, Linux, etc. Windows 2000 and Windows Me are now obsolete, like DOS became obsolete when Win 95 came out.

That is why I am amused at those saying they will never use it. It is like the DOS guys who said they would never go to Windows.

154 posted on 10/27/2001 2:04:34 PM PDT by OK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton
Bump ! for a free market !
155 posted on 10/27/2001 2:11:32 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: WileyCoyote22
I did not call him a moron, he proved it himself if it took him 2 hours to install the OS. And he calls himself a professional?

He sounds like a professional. Professionals take two hours, or however long it takes, to make sure that all drivers and apps work, that data is backed up prior to the upgrade (you backed up your critical data before the upgrade, didn't you?), or in the case of jammer's computer guy, that the system will be absolutely compatible with the hardware config that will go out the door with customers in a real business.

Sounds like you had some non-working drivers. So was your system installed, or did you just make it through the wizard? A partial-install with some non-functional devices doesn't fit my definition of professional. Keep track of the time needed to make your system as functional as the one you replaced, then decide whether two hours makes a moron.

156 posted on 10/27/2001 2:11:32 PM PDT by captain11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #157 Removed by Moderator

To: PeterBarringer
But it's so CHEAP now. It cost me $70 for 512MB.

Also, I need to keep lots of applications up at one time, and I like knowing I never have to page out to disk, even then.

158 posted on 10/27/2001 2:37:44 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
... that blasphemy called Windows Me, what a rotten trick MS played with that one ...

You must understand that Microsoft only releases BETA software for the public to test. (They have a lot of nerve charging $$ for it). ME never made it to the "Second Edition" (thank goodness!)

I believe you will eventually realize this about XP as well.

159 posted on 10/27/2001 2:40:07 PM PDT by bimbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #160 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 341-359 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson