Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Last Will and Testament Smart Parting Shots by Barbara Olson
http://www.frontpagemag.com/columnists/ponte/2001/ponte10-25-01.htm ^

Posted on 10/25/2001 10:27:02 PM PDT by VinnyTex

Last Will and Testament
Smart Parting Shots by Barbara Olson

FrontPageMagazine.com | October 25, 2001

DAYS AFTER COMPLETING HER BOOK, The Final Days, Barbara Olson died aboard the airliner that terrorists skyjacked and flew into the Pentagon. The first half of this set, Hell to Pay: The Unfolding Story of Hillary Rodham Clinton, soared onto best-seller lists in 1999 and left the First Lady spitting with fury at the truth it revealed about her.

Make Comments
View Comments
Printable Article
Email Article

No wonder, then, that while the rest of America mourned the deaths of Barbara Olson and 5,800 others in the hours after the attacks of September 11, Hillary Clinton and her operatives reportedly were frantically trying to stop publication of Olson’s surefire best-seller sequel. Barbara Olson’s intelligent and honest voice had been silenced, and Hillary wanted her last book dead and buried too.

Open the covers of this magnificent book to any page and you will immediately see why Hillary wanted to kill The Final Days. Detail by shocking detail, using her vast experience as a former Justice Department attorney, congressional investigator, and general counsel in the United States Senate, Olson lays out an indictment of Bill and Hillary Clinton’s relentless arrogance, greed and corruption.

Does this matter, now that the Clinton Administration is a fading nightmare in the rear-view mirror of history? It does, and the ammunition this book provides is urgently needed on every American bookshelf, for at least three reasons.

This book remains vitally important to our nation’s future because the Clintons are yet with us. Senator Hillary Clinton (D.-N.Y.) is positioning herself to be, at minimum, her party’s Vice Presidential nominee in 2004 and its Presidential candidate in 2008.

Rush Limbaugh used to say that a national shrine should be erected to Mary Jo Kopechne because her tragic drowning in a car in water only six feet deep at Chappaquiddick guaranteed that Ted Kennedy would never become President.

Barbara Olson likewise merits a national memorial. Her two splendid books could be the stake through the heart of Hillary Clinton’s megalomaniacal Presidential ambition. These books could thereby save our nation. In the phrase originated on my radio show, these books continue to scream out "America, wake up and smell the Clintons!"

The right response by any moral person to Hillary, wherever she appears, is the one given by heroic New York City firefighters and police at the benefit concert last weekend.

The second reason is that the Clintons still control the Democratic Party through their appointed sock puppet Terry McAuliffe. Its values and morals are toxic Clinton values and morals.

The third – and to me most important – reason why everyone should read this book comes from words Olson quotes from Democratic National Committee member Paul Goldman. President Clinton, said Goldman, had "made hollow a key tenet of Democratic philosophy – that the president is the moral center of our political system and must lead by example to capture the power of America’s principled idealism."

The co-presidents Clinton did lead by example, but to where? In Goldman’s words, "Mr. Clinton didn’t just take the White House china; he took its soul and flushed it down the toilet."

Today the Clintons remain like a giant billboard in front of our children, who daily read there the message: "CHEATING PAYS! Look at us," Bill and Hillary’s example shouts. "We lied. We cheated. We broke every moral, ethical, and legal rule you can think of. And we have walked away with glory, a U.S. Senate seat, book deals worth $10 million and $8.5 million respectively, and a good shot at returning to the White House for another eight years. You kids who play by the rules are suckers!"

My only quandary here is that by giving your children Hell to Pay and The Final Days, you will show them that the filth that is the Clintons has been recorded, dissected, and ridiculed. But you might also hear your kids, like yourself, muttering: "Wow, they got away with even more than I knew!"

In this movie, at least thus far, the bad guys are the winners. Isn’t this one of the messages we condemn Hollywood for putting into the minds of our children?

So what will readers learn or recall about the Clintons from The Final Days? This devilish duo knew how to milk the maximum quid from every pro quo. Even in leavin’, Bill and Hillary took with them White House furniture not nailed down and put the rest of the Executive Branch up for auction to the highest bidders.

Among those buying last-minute Presidential pardons was wealthy fugitive Marc Rich, whose ex-wife Denise funneled at least $1.5 million to Clinton interests. Of this loot, $1.2 million went to the Democratic National Committee, $75,000 to Hillary’s Senate campaign, and $450,000 to the Clinton Library, Bill’s personal "piggy bank" slush fund. She also gave expensive gifts to the Clintons and, according to some rumors, had a very close relationship with Bill. Another of many such pardon purchasers was Pincus Green.

Olson quotes comedian Dennis Miller: "We’ve all been watching in astonishment these past few weeks as the Clintons merrily parade their greed and corruption past us like a garish Mardi Gras float powered by the drivetrain of Bill Clinton’s gargantuan sense of entitlement. Hillary steers, while Bill sits on the top tossing pardons out to the crowd like a drunken Bacchus with a perpetual h**d-on for a scepter…. You almost have to admire the sheer audacity of granting pardons to two tax-scamming billionaire fugitives named Rich and Green. If the symbolism were any more obvious, Andrew Lloyd Weber would be writing music for it."

Barbara’s beautifully-written book is relieved with much wit, but this laughter catches in the throat and leaves a bitter aftertaste. The Clintons did evil things not in a Fellini Satyricon fantasy but in our White House, using our taxes, and selling our government (in ways far beyond renting the Lincoln Bedroom) for their personal profit.

Another who pocketed a Clinton pardon was convicted cocaine kingpin Carlos Vignali. Such pardons prompted Hardball’s Chris Matthews to say: "Before this, we laughed at poor little countries that drug dealers and international crooks could buy. We mocked the Third World capitals where a little money…would open doors or close eyes. Thanks to Bill and Hillary Clinton, we have now forfeited that small national vanity."

The Clintons sold to the devil whatever soul was left of the Democratic Party, turned the Congress (as even President Ronald Reagan had been unable to do) Republican, and transformed America into a kind of banana republic ruled by Executive Orders, emergency decrees, expropriations, and la mordida – bribery and extortion.

Such Clinton behavior was "disgraceful," said former Democratic President Jimmy Carter. Carter’s former Chief of Staff Hamilton Jordan described the First Couple as "grifters…a term used in the Great Depression to describe fast-talking con artists who roamed the countryside, profiting at the expense of the poor and the uneducated, always one step ahead of the law, moving on before they were held accountable for their schemes and half-truths."

And their fellow freebooters were the same sort, like Bill Clinton’s "spiritual advisor" in matters of sexual addiction, the Reverend Jesse Jackson. Clinton pardoned Jackson’s operative and Rainbow/PUSH Coalition official Dorothy Rivers. She had pled guilty to stealing $1.2 million in government grants intended to help homeless children, using the money instead to buy herself a $35,000 fur coat, a Mercedes, clothes for her live-in boyfriend, a $250,000 record company, a home on Lake Michigan, as well as political donations to Democratic candidates and various other self-indulgent things Olson details.

The Clinton M.O., as Barbara Olson recognized, has usually been to "engage in some marginally lawful and blatantly abusive conduct, often actually violating existing laws. When caught in the act, they could call for new laws making their prior conduct illegal and decry the flaws in the system that allowed them to misbehave in the first place. It was like O.J. Simpson calling for an investigation to find the murderer of his wife. Except that the Clintons trotted out this maneuver again and again."

Hillary’s sub-gambit at such times was to claim ignorance or a failure of memory, and then to play the victim rather than the victimizer. Thus, when it was revealed that her own attorney brother Hugh Rodham had received more than $400,000 from Vignali and another pardon applicant he had pushed on the President, Hillary denied knowing anything about it. This, she said, was "regrettable" and left her feeling "disappointed."

This tactic, wrote Olson, was "Hillary’s version of the virgin birth." Or maybe the immaculate deception. No wonder she is now known as "Slick Hillie."

But as Barbara sagely observed, such chicanery and twisted values have created large contradictions in the life and pretenses of Hillary Rodham Clinton. As a candidate for Senate, Hillary claimed co-presidential credit for every Administration accomplishment, boasting that she was deeply involved in making every policy and decision. But whenever this was inconvenient, she claimed to "have no knowledge" and to not be "involved" in things that obviously happened with her knowledge and likely instigation.

One larger contradiction noted by Olson is that Bill and Hillary are "the ultimate members of the ‘me generation’" who "used the power of the presidency to assure the perpetuation of their own careers in the regal style to which they had become accustomed and which they saw as theirs by entitlement. Royalty, once assumed, is hard to relinquish."

Hillary may "crave luxury" and wealth, spending on herself up to $2,400 for a cashmere jacket. On the verge of leaving the White House, she registered "with luxury retailers," wrote Olson, "as though she were about to become an impoverished new bride," and then made clear that she expected others to purchase costly gifts of her desiring. "No first lady," wrote Olson, "had ever been quite so crass."

But at the same time, observes Olson, Hillary may be a materialist, but ideologically she is a dialectical materialist, a committed, hard-core Leftist. Hillary, writes Olson, "was shaped by liberation theology, a Marxist variation of the Christian faith, radical feminism, and the outer reaches of the political Left. In 1972, she interned for former Communist Party lawyer Robert Treuhaft, husband of the prominent communist writer Jessica Mitford. Both were Stalinists and rigidly pro-Soviet…. Hillary Clinton has never repudiated her involvement with these extremists or explained her opinion of their beliefs…. Few journalists seem motivated to ask the questions…. Hillary has never had to answer even soft questions about her lengthy flirtation with leftist radicals."

Perhaps Hillary, if I may speculate, is the reincarnation of Friedrich Engels, heir to an industrial fortune who lived in luxury but co-authored works such as The Communist Manifesto with Karl Marx. We used to have "limousine liberals." Hillary is a "millionaire Mercedes Marxist."

Olson's book reminds America that Clinton pardons were given for more than profit. A Weather Underground member linked to killing two policemen was pardoned, as was SLA victim-member Patty Hearst. And during Hillary’s senate race, Bill Clinton pardoned a spate of Puerto Rican FALN terrorists who had wounded many and killed six, including police. These cop-killers were freed to win Puerto Rican and other Hispanic votes for Hillary. But the FALN, Olson reminds us, is also a Marxist group whose politics parallel Hillary’s own. And their release did, as Olson wrote, "send a signal" that the Clinton Administration could cozy up to terrorists (as in the Elian Gonzalez case it showed comradeship with Fidel Castro and used Gestapo tactics against Americans).

(FALN types, Olson notes, in 1950 killed police while trying to assassinate Democratic President Harry Truman. She does not mention that in 1954 FALN terrorists machine-gunned Congress, killing five lawmakers as well as police. Nor does she mention that in 1977 and 1979 Jimmy Carter pardoned four of the 1954 killer terrorists and one who tried to kill President Truman. I call that "Disgraceful.")

So who will get the last laugh? Hillary failed to block publication of Barbara Olson’s magnificent book. But Barbara, who died not as a victim but as a warrior "casualty" of the war against terrorism and evil, has now left us with a last, smart parting shot. Hillary only loses if America learns what she is really like. Hillary Clinton wins if you do not get and read The Final Days, the second half of Barbara Olson’s brilliant indictment against her. This book – bequeathing her knowledge and insight to immunize us against another ugly infection of Clintonic Hillaragic Fever – is a survival tool you and our nation may need in 2004, 2008, and beyond. Buy and read this book, and you will be helping to wipe that smug, arrogant smile off Hillary’s face.

Mr. Ponte hosts a national radio talk show Saturdays 6-9 PM Eastern Time (3-6 PM Pacific Time) that can be heard on 210 stations and via TalkAmerica.com. The show’s live call-in number is (888) 822-8255. A professional speaker, he is a former Roving Editor for Reader’s Digest. Click here to send him a message.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: VinnyTex
"Buy and read this book, and you will be helping to wipe that smug, arrogant smile off Hillary’s face."

Talk about incentive for purchase! I've ordered three for some die hard Clinton apologists. Bet that they are used for door stops. No matter what the argument, it is impossible to convince them that the Clinton's are anything other than victims!

41 posted on 10/26/2001 3:45:00 PM PDT by fuzzthatwuz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
"Hillary may "crave luxury" and wealth, spending on herself up to $2,400 for a cashmere jacket. On the verge of leaving the White House, she registered "with luxury retailers..." As she only seems to sport a certain black pantsuit, what do you suppose this means? Split personality?
42 posted on 10/26/2001 4:01:52 PM PDT by monkeywrench
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alabama_Wild_Man
Yes, I suspect Clintonic Hillaragic Fever had infected many in the media during the past few election cycles. Hopefully, Hillary's SHAMEFUL behavior during the WTC crisis towards GW as well as her past comments regarding Palistinians will innoculate some New Yorkers so they won't succumb to the Fever again. However, now I hear a case of Gorenorea is setting in for the 2004 campaign.
43 posted on 10/26/2001 6:28:34 PM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bushwon
"...now I hear a case of Gorenorea is setting in for the 2004 campaign..."

==========================================

Yech !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

...........well, there goes the neighborhood.....


44 posted on 10/26/2001 7:34:33 PM PDT by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I keep seeing links about the Clintons trying to stop publication, and all I get when I click on them is a paragraph from an advertisement:

"Instead, they put their PR spin machine into high gear -- to stop the publication of Barbara's newest book, "The Final Days."

So, where are the details? What did they do?

45 posted on 10/26/2001 7:47:26 PM PDT by Rocko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Alabama_Wild_Man
LOL!
46 posted on 10/27/2001 8:40:04 AM PDT by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: max epr
#38: "Democrats I know Still will not tolerate any criticism of the Clintons..."

That's because they know the criticism applies to them, as well.

It goes back to what I said about them knowing who and what the Clintons are when they voted for them. Twice.

Don't worry. They know that the Clinton's legacy is also their legacy. And they know that we know it too.

47 posted on 10/27/2001 9:29:51 AM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
Hillary is a "millionaire Mercedes Marxist."

What a great line!!!!

48 posted on 10/27/2001 9:44:05 AM PDT by Focault's Pendulum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Focault's Pendulum
bttt for BKO
49 posted on 10/27/2001 9:57:42 AM PDT by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
thanks
50 posted on 10/27/2001 10:21:43 AM PDT by dalebert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Mr. Olson, this one's for you...

BKO BTTT!

5.56mm

51 posted on 10/27/2001 10:34:45 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Thanks for a great read!
52 posted on 10/27/2001 10:42:03 AM PDT by LiberteeBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kapn kuek; oldglory; Luke FReeman; Seeking the truth
#26: "Not sure where I fit in your list, maybe #1, just not sure."

The Clintons, and their like-minded supporters fit in slot #1, so you decide.

You continued to write: ".... the Blue Dog Democrats, is very conservative. He also came highly recommended by the NRA as a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. We have lots of conservative Democrats here in Texas. What should we do with them? Vote them out of office?

"Conservative DemocRAT" is an oxymoron. The Blue Dogs are merely a little more conservative than the average, but not by much. Most people in Texas, and elsewhere, were "born" into DemocRAT families. They are just DemocRATS by birth ... not as the result of "critical thought".

Here's the mindless mantra (I'm sure you've heard it before): "Mah daddy wuz a Dem-O-crat, and thats guuud eeeenuff fur me!"(By the way ... that goes for most religious people's "church affiliation", also).

One is a conservative as a result of using the intellect; of using critical thought, and then having the courage to face the reality and truth that critical thought inevitably leads to, in spite of one's emotions, and what one might *want to believe*.

One is a DemocRAT as a result of "relying on feelings", deliberately in spite of, or deliberately in ignorance of, reality and truth. Any relativists who rely on fluctuating feelings to determine right and wrong, and to make important decisions in life ("Mah daddy wuz a Dem-O-crat.."), are the useful idiot DemocRATS that are "used" by the cynical opportunist DemocRATS, to obtain power.

You continued to write: "...I think the real problem with the Demoncrats is that they have been taken over by the left wing socialist of this country. We should do all we can to liberate the Demoncrats from the evil of socialism. If they will purge the Demons as leaders of their party, i.e. Hitliary Clintoon, they will again become the Democratic Party."

In case you don't know it, the DemocRAT party has always been considered to be "the woman" of the two opposite philosophical persuasions known as the DemocRAT and Rebublican parties.

The only time "the woman" (in the opportunistic and emotion-driven voting majority) has ever allowed "the man" (in the emotionally mature voting minority) to be in charge, is when she sees the inevitable results of putting her self-serving and/or illogical ideas into action, coming home to roost.

She will allow the man to be back in charge only long enough to straighten out her messes. Then it's back to the same old opportunistic, emotion-driven, business as usual.

Even the Republican party has been feminized. It is full of RINOS today.

Feminized males, and the airhead females who feminized them, have emasculated every single one of the institutions that had made America great. They emasculated God (in our seminaries and churches). They emasculated our families. They emasculated our schools, colleges and universities. They emasculated our military. They emasculated government; federal, state and local.

That emasculation has made us weak and vulnerable to attack on many fronts.

Freedom is not free, but requires "eternal vigilence" in order to protect it. "The woman" has a track record of focusing on, and dangerously prioritizing "social" concerns, over national security. This is typical of the illogical, emotion-driven mentality. It never "dawns on them" that a "social security" check won't do them a damn bit of good if they don't have a country. "The woman" ... the party of the emasculators and the emasculated can NEVER be entrusted to defend and ensure American citizen's God-given rights and freedoms for the future.

Those 3 catagories of the people who vote for and support DemocRATS today, would never have voted for the emotionally mature, MEN who were America's noble founders. Nor do they ever vote for noble mentalities today, unless they have to in order to save their rear-ends. Like now.

BTTT

53 posted on 10/27/2001 12:48:35 PM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: fuzzthatwuz
#41: "No matter what the argument, it is impossible to convince them that the Clinton's are anything other than victims!"

So you think it's profitable to try and use legitimate, emotionally mature arguments (reason), with emotionally immature and/or cynical, opportunistic mentalities???

Don't waste your time.

Make no mistake. They already know what you're trying to "convice them of".

The only profitable, and effective response to their illigitimate "arguments" is to publically, in front of as many people as possible, EXPOSE them for who and what they are, and cause people to laugh at them. Like Rush so effectively has always done.

Private, one on one "reason" efforts with the "unreasonable", are a big waste of time.

If you've ever noticed here on Free Republic .... or any other public forum, those who aren't able to legitimately defend their ideas when challenged, will always engage in personal attacks or try to "go private", and send you private mail to "discuss it". I never take either of those two baits. :)

54 posted on 10/27/2001 1:17:38 PM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
I bought both of Barbara Olson's books today. Looking forward to reading all weekend!
55 posted on 10/27/2001 6:01:20 PM PDT by Kudo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Rodriguez
Ping - for Ted Olson
56 posted on 10/28/2001 7:22:46 AM PST by Gracey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gracey
BTTT!
57 posted on 10/28/2001 9:54:40 PM PST by hawkeyeBetsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: VinnyTex
Prayers for Ted! God bless you sir!
58 posted on 10/28/2001 9:58:10 PM PST by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max epr
IMO some of the irrational defense of X42 comes from the pain the leftists experienced during 12 years of Reagan-Bush - the pain of a WH that wasn't populated by druggies and sex perverts. That plus the fact that few things irritate arrogant people as much as being treated as irrelevant - and if Reagan espoused anything, it was that the left has nothing to contribute to government. It's why they feel so much bile about Newt - Newt never gave them the respect they don't deserve. They're concerned know that W will give them another long spell in the wilderness. X42's vileness enabled their self-loathing - and they miss it.
59 posted on 10/28/2001 10:13:21 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Matchett-PI
In Reply:

One is a conservative as a result of using the intellect; of using critical thought, and then having the courage to face the reality and truth that critical thought inevitably leads to, in spite of one's emotions, and what one might *want to believe*.

There are more Conservative Democrats in Texas than there are Conservative Republicans on the East Coast. We will always have a two party system for elections. It would be best for our nation if both candidates were Conservative.

The only time "the woman" (in the opportunistic and emotion-driven voting majority) has ever allowed "the man" (in the emotionally mature voting minority) to be in charge, is when she sees the inevitable results of putting her self-serving and/or illogical ideas into action, coming home to roost.
She will allow the man to be back in charge only long enough to straighten out her messes. Then it's back to the same old opportunistic, emotion-driven, business as usual.
Even the Republican party has been feminized. It is full of RINOS today.

I agree that Feminist have ruined much of the Family Values that have made America great. But the Femi-Nazis are but a few with very little support from the majority of women. What gives them the power to destroy American Values is the Biased Left Wing Media. Dan Rather has done far more harm to this nation by propagandizing women with he leftist agenda.

60 posted on 10/29/2001 7:00:06 AM PST by kapn kuek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson