Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kapn kuek; oldglory; Luke FReeman; Seeking the truth
#26: "Not sure where I fit in your list, maybe #1, just not sure."

The Clintons, and their like-minded supporters fit in slot #1, so you decide.

You continued to write: ".... the Blue Dog Democrats, is very conservative. He also came highly recommended by the NRA as a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. We have lots of conservative Democrats here in Texas. What should we do with them? Vote them out of office?

"Conservative DemocRAT" is an oxymoron. The Blue Dogs are merely a little more conservative than the average, but not by much. Most people in Texas, and elsewhere, were "born" into DemocRAT families. They are just DemocRATS by birth ... not as the result of "critical thought".

Here's the mindless mantra (I'm sure you've heard it before): "Mah daddy wuz a Dem-O-crat, and thats guuud eeeenuff fur me!"(By the way ... that goes for most religious people's "church affiliation", also).

One is a conservative as a result of using the intellect; of using critical thought, and then having the courage to face the reality and truth that critical thought inevitably leads to, in spite of one's emotions, and what one might *want to believe*.

One is a DemocRAT as a result of "relying on feelings", deliberately in spite of, or deliberately in ignorance of, reality and truth. Any relativists who rely on fluctuating feelings to determine right and wrong, and to make important decisions in life ("Mah daddy wuz a Dem-O-crat.."), are the useful idiot DemocRATS that are "used" by the cynical opportunist DemocRATS, to obtain power.

You continued to write: "...I think the real problem with the Demoncrats is that they have been taken over by the left wing socialist of this country. We should do all we can to liberate the Demoncrats from the evil of socialism. If they will purge the Demons as leaders of their party, i.e. Hitliary Clintoon, they will again become the Democratic Party."

In case you don't know it, the DemocRAT party has always been considered to be "the woman" of the two opposite philosophical persuasions known as the DemocRAT and Rebublican parties.

The only time "the woman" (in the opportunistic and emotion-driven voting majority) has ever allowed "the man" (in the emotionally mature voting minority) to be in charge, is when she sees the inevitable results of putting her self-serving and/or illogical ideas into action, coming home to roost.

She will allow the man to be back in charge only long enough to straighten out her messes. Then it's back to the same old opportunistic, emotion-driven, business as usual.

Even the Republican party has been feminized. It is full of RINOS today.

Feminized males, and the airhead females who feminized them, have emasculated every single one of the institutions that had made America great. They emasculated God (in our seminaries and churches). They emasculated our families. They emasculated our schools, colleges and universities. They emasculated our military. They emasculated government; federal, state and local.

That emasculation has made us weak and vulnerable to attack on many fronts.

Freedom is not free, but requires "eternal vigilence" in order to protect it. "The woman" has a track record of focusing on, and dangerously prioritizing "social" concerns, over national security. This is typical of the illogical, emotion-driven mentality. It never "dawns on them" that a "social security" check won't do them a damn bit of good if they don't have a country. "The woman" ... the party of the emasculators and the emasculated can NEVER be entrusted to defend and ensure American citizen's God-given rights and freedoms for the future.

Those 3 catagories of the people who vote for and support DemocRATS today, would never have voted for the emotionally mature, MEN who were America's noble founders. Nor do they ever vote for noble mentalities today, unless they have to in order to save their rear-ends. Like now.

BTTT

53 posted on 10/27/2001 12:48:35 PM PDT by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Matchett-PI
In Reply:

One is a conservative as a result of using the intellect; of using critical thought, and then having the courage to face the reality and truth that critical thought inevitably leads to, in spite of one's emotions, and what one might *want to believe*.

There are more Conservative Democrats in Texas than there are Conservative Republicans on the East Coast. We will always have a two party system for elections. It would be best for our nation if both candidates were Conservative.

The only time "the woman" (in the opportunistic and emotion-driven voting majority) has ever allowed "the man" (in the emotionally mature voting minority) to be in charge, is when she sees the inevitable results of putting her self-serving and/or illogical ideas into action, coming home to roost.
She will allow the man to be back in charge only long enough to straighten out her messes. Then it's back to the same old opportunistic, emotion-driven, business as usual.
Even the Republican party has been feminized. It is full of RINOS today.

I agree that Feminist have ruined much of the Family Values that have made America great. But the Femi-Nazis are but a few with very little support from the majority of women. What gives them the power to destroy American Values is the Biased Left Wing Media. Dan Rather has done far more harm to this nation by propagandizing women with he leftist agenda.

60 posted on 10/29/2001 7:00:06 AM PST by kapn kuek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson