Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arrest of second Pak n-expert exposes jehadi bomb trail
HindustanTimes.com | 10/25/01 | HTC and Agencies

Posted on 10/25/2001 8:10:10 PM PDT by kattracks

(Islamabad/Moscow, October 25)
There is now a nuclear dimension to the Afghan war. A second retired Pakistani atomic scientist was picked up by Islamabad on Tuesday night on the suspicion that he was developing a nuclear device for Osama bin Laden and the Taliban. The arrests followed tip-offs by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation to the Pakistani authorities.

Sultan Bashiruddin Mehmood and Abdul Majeed, both scientists who had retired from the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC), were picked up after the FBI provided evidence of their links to jehadi outfits.

The Pakistan Interior Minister, Moinuddin Haidar, said on Thursday that Bashiruddin was being taken into "protective custody." Military spokesman, Rashid Qureshi, only said the scientist was being questioned.

After retirement, Bashiruddin had formed an NGO called Ummah Tameer-e-Nau (Reconstruction of the Muslim Ummah). This NGO was affiliated to the Al Rasheed Trust, an organisation banned for its links with Al-Qaeda network. The NGO was one of the few allowed by Mullah Muhammad Omar to carry out relief work in Afghanistan.

Majeed was the chief engineer of PAEC until last year. Pakistani press reports said he had been trying to get a hold of supplies of plutonium and enriched uranium to send to the Taliban.

Bashiruddin was with the PAEC for 35 years. He held many senior positions, including director of the Kahuta Enrichment Project. He was also one of the designers of the Khusab nuclear plant in Punjab. He took early retirement in 1998 to protest moves by the then Nawaz Sharif government to sign the CTBT, a treaty he strongly opposed.

Bashiruddin founded Ummah Tameer-e-Nau after vowing to rebuild Afghanistan. Most of its membership consisted of nuclear scientists and military officers. Bashiruddin's Islamic fervour was well known, catching even the attention of Mullah Omar.

The Taliban gave him permission to conclude business agreements on their behalf. This strengthened suspicions that Bashiruddin's NGO was looking for nuclear hardware for Kabul.

He and Majeed had been under investigation by a joint US-Pakistani intelligence team.

The West is reportedly also concerned about A.Q. Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear bomb. Khan resigned as head of the country's nuclear programme in March this year. Because he had publicly expressed sympathy for the jehad movement, it was rumoured he was joining the fundamentalists.

The detention of the two scientists follows statements by Pakistani officials, including President Pervez Musharraf, that the country's nuclear installations and assets were secure.

There have been persistent rumours Bin Laden has sought weapons of mass destruction —chemical, biological and nuclear.

Pakistan is increasingly seen as a possible source of such weaponry for the Taliban or Bin Laden. One reason is the large number of scientists employed by its nuclear programme. The other is the creeping popularity of the fundamentalist cause among educated, urban Pakistanis.

In the past, the most likely source was one of the "loose nukes" scattered about the ex-Soviet Union. Seven years ago, Russian agents stopped a planeload of Russian nuclear scientists heading off to North Korea.

Says Michael Krepon of the Henry Stimson Centre in Washington, which does research on nuclear security, "It is easy to get fissionable material, but difficult to make a bomb." He points out the Taliban could just mix nuclear material with RDX. This would not produce an atomic explosion. But, say other experts, the very knowledge Kabul has weapons-grade nuclear material could deter US bombing as Washington would have to fear a terrorist strike that could leave nuclear contaminants.



TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abdulmajeed; abdulmajid; afghanistan; alqaeda; alrasheedtrust; aqkhan; arrests; atomicscientists; bashiruddin; binladen; ctbt; islamicbomb; kahuta; khan; khusab; khusabnuclearplant; majeed; majid; mehmood; mullahomar; nawazsharif; ngo; nuclear; nuclearplant; nuclearscientists; nukes; nukescientists; omar; paec; pakistan; plutonium; qadeerkhan; rdx; scientists; sharif; taliban; terrorcharities; ummahtameerenau; uranium
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Cool Guy
volley bump!
21 posted on 10/25/2001 8:45:31 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
One of the many fears I have is that the reason the Taliban keeps yelling about a ground war is because they want to use a nuke on them. {sigh}
22 posted on 10/25/2001 8:48:19 PM PDT by RoseyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fusion
What will happen after Thanksgiving, when one weekend several crowded shopping malls are attacked simultaneously?

....Geez. I bet you'refun at a party.

23 posted on 10/25/2001 8:53:46 PM PDT by Anamensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: Cool Guy
and who gave it to china? WJC
26 posted on 10/25/2001 8:57:06 PM PDT by US_MilitaryRules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fusion
You're running a little ahead of the script here.

Besides, I don't think America will have to lose 'a few million' to get serious about waging effective, ruthless, and overwhelming war.

It will come soon enough, even for your taste.

27 posted on 10/25/2001 8:57:38 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MaeWest
I was just wondering the same thing.
28 posted on 10/25/2001 9:05:49 PM PDT by The Real Deal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #29 Removed by Moderator

To: WileyCoyote22
Why not attack Israel ?

Because Israel has some nukes too and won't hesitate to use them. America does hesitate right now, which is terrible. Nukes away!!!

30 posted on 10/25/2001 9:07:41 PM PDT by eclectic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

To: eclectic
Don't just blame the Paki's.

We had a big hand in these guy's getting their start.

32 posted on 10/25/2001 9:12:18 PM PDT by nm_james
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: BlackJack; Cool Guy; kattracks; Dog Gone
They could deliver via a container --- to Los Angeles or New york.

Not much gets checked here in Los Angels--- see this

ID System for Port Workers Considered (Los Angeles California )

The container could even be personally attended - perhaps this was an experiment:

Egyptian terror suspect had satellite telephone, fake ID (Hid In Container)

33 posted on 10/25/2001 9:34:18 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WileyCoyote22
See post #33, --- we would be trouble here by the beach if a container had a nasty device within!
34 posted on 10/25/2001 9:36:32 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WileyCoyote22
#1 I think you overestimate the Islamic rage. While many are not happy with the war only a small percentage of the nutcases are willing to die for the cause of Osama

Um, what does a small percentage of a billion people translate into?

35 posted on 10/25/2001 9:39:06 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
FYI
36 posted on 10/25/2001 9:42:49 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
the very knowledge Kabul has weapons-grade nuclear material could deter US bombing as Washington would have to fear a terrorist strike that could leave nuclear contaminants

I think their summation is in error. Their logic is bad. This fact would cause the U.S. to increase its efforts, no appeasement like what they suggest would bring any measure of safety at all -- the only safety is in their complete and swift destruction.

37 posted on 10/25/2001 9:45:48 PM PDT by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants
A tramp steamer with a few metal cargo containers is good enough to destroy a large harbor. Norfork, Virginia is a mighty big and tempting target.

They just caught one Islamic bozo with an onboard container set up to carry him to Toronto in comfort. Had a laptop, three cellphones, one of which was a satellite phone, etc. Looked like he was ready to hide in the cargo hold all the way.

If a dirty nuke were set off on a ship, located near Montreal, during the proper wind conditions, much of the east coast of the US would get a radioactive dusting.

I hope they searched every container on that ship.

38 posted on 10/25/2001 9:48:23 PM PDT by atafak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: MaxwellWolf
OK --- here is what they say:

Laden has nuclear materials: Paper

39 posted on 10/25/2001 9:48:36 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #40 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson