Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dixierat22
Backlash? What, we just wait until 50,000 civilians here or dead? Or 100,000? Oh please oh wise one, tell us the number before you press the button. Or are you another liberal lurker?
112 posted on 10/24/2001 1:01:02 PM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: Nuke'm Glowing
I am by no means a liberal anything. But I am sensible enough to see the following:
1) We have no viable target for nukes if we are inclined to use them.
2) Even if we had a target, we could and probably should destroy it with conventional weapons.
3) The political fallout, in terms of world opinion, would far outweigh any gains we could hope for by the use of such weapons. Are we not the most powerful military on earth? Is it really necessary for us to hunt down cave dwelling cowards with nukes? That strikes me as the equivalent of hunting mice with my .308.
4) The 'bio' attacks on us have, so far, been amatuerish at best.

There is no 'magic number' before we start hunting down and killing the terrorists. The only thing I see as foolish is the suggestion that nukes are a reasonable weapon to use against them.

Are you in a rush to see Armageddon?

116 posted on 10/24/2001 1:22:13 PM PDT by dixierat22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson