Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. Steve Buyer, IN-R on Fox Demands use of nuclear weapons if Anthrax traced to Terrorists
Fox News Live ^ | 24 OCT 01 | DCBryan1

Posted on 10/24/2001 9:21:29 AM PDT by DCBryan1

Im paraphrasing what the Congressment is saying:

"We as a country cannot fear an open discussion {on the use of nuclear weapons)".

We have been attacked by Biological weapons, and as per our 50 year plan, need to fulfill our promise to deter such attacks by using small, tactical nuclear weapons on terrorists strongholds.

If we do not retaliate with weapons of mass destruction as they have used on us, future terrorist attacks with WMD may not be detered and the consequences may be more than we are willing to bear.

Steve Buyer, IN-R

Again I was paraphrasing.


TOPICS: Announcements; Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-155 next last
To: DCBryan1

paratroopers.org

81 posted on 10/24/2001 10:48:17 AM PDT by Moridin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassExodus
Couldn't find it! I even refreshed my page too. ?????
82 posted on 10/24/2001 10:48:51 AM PDT by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Hang on ...
83 posted on 10/24/2001 10:50:35 AM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ratcat
Paterson NJ. Jersey City. Edison. Trenton/Camden Philadelphia. Bergen County. Middlesex County. Time to start rounding people up.
84 posted on 10/24/2001 10:59:07 AM PDT by lds23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Seeking the truth
Are you looking at post #49 ?

It is there.

85 posted on 10/24/2001 10:59:09 AM PDT by MassExodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: flamefront
Andrew Sullivan has been the only journalist writing about this that I have seen. Excellent analysis.

as

Read what is posted today and in last weeks archive.

We have a moral imperative to nuke these guys.

86 posted on 10/24/2001 11:01:30 AM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
Anyone who supports the use of nukes in this situation is a fool. They obviously have no knowledge of the effects nor take into consideration the backlash that would be used by such action.

Pick your seat carefully....

87 posted on 10/24/2001 11:03:02 AM PDT by dixierat22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MassExodus
Now I see it. I must have mishit the Refresh button before. Maybe, it is the early onset of Antrax. I live in Boca Raton, doncha know?
88 posted on 10/24/2001 11:05:38 AM PDT by Seeking the truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: dixierat22
I have a pretty good understanding of nukes and their effects.

Hundreds of nuclear weapons have been exploded above ground and yet we are still here.

Perhaps W is a fool for sending tactical nuclear weapons into the theater? Why do you think we sent them there if we don't have the potential to use them?

89 posted on 10/24/2001 11:09:37 AM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
I agree. This would be an opportunity to test our nuetron bomb and its wartime capability.

Give the hacks an ultimatum.

Give up Bin Laden
Cease the anthrax distribution
Clean every spore of anthrax in this country by 5pm

or be inihilated PERIOD no discussion no negotiation.

90 posted on 10/24/2001 11:10:29 AM PDT by cyberlaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ratcat
I understand what you say completely but, For every action there is an equal (or Greater) reaction. Whoever is responsible Whether it's Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq it doesn't matter, we can & should Nuke their @ss! We'll deal with their Terrorist Cells as well unit by unit, terrorist by terrorist. We have to make sure that a price is paid for attacking the U.S. period!
91 posted on 10/24/2001 11:11:43 AM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: dixierat22
Oh, and PS: nor take into consideration the backlash that would be used by such action.

Umm, you are worried perhaps that maybe people in the Middle East may dislike us and then kill thousands of Americans and then send us anthrax in the mail?

Perhaps you should bone up on current events.

The BAD GUYS need to be afraid of what WE will do to them when they decide to use WMD, not the other way around.

92 posted on 10/24/2001 11:12:19 AM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Moridin
Allah was only a figment of Muhammad's imagination.

Well said.

93 posted on 10/24/2001 11:17:06 AM PDT by winstonchurchill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: blaster88
I know that we will survive their use, I'm thinking as much of the moral and long term political consequences. It is not necessary to nuke anyone over the use of biological or chemical weapons. Potentially, large numbers of innocent people could or would be killed or subjected to radiation poisoning. Do you want that on our collective concious? Is revenge the only motivation we need for using nukes?

Here we have an elected member of the US government calling for the use of nukes in an undeclared war! Doesn't that make you think that maybe that individual is a little off?

94 posted on 10/24/2001 11:22:28 AM PDT by dixierat22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: blaster88
It's not some terrorist hiding in a cave I'm concerned with. It's the rest of the world. You have heard of the Chinese, Russians, and some of the other nuclear powers. These people could take offense to us using even small tactical nukes on a defenseless population. Would they take action? Do you really want top find out?
95 posted on 10/24/2001 11:28:20 AM PDT by dixierat22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Terry Mross
The point is we should use nukes IF it's traced to these terrorists. Nobody has said use nukes if it's greenpeace.

OK, we'll fix that.

If it's greenpest, or creeppeace, or whatever they call themselves, nuke'em! That will solve two problems at once, eliminating terrorists and elminating a social pollutant.

Hank

96 posted on 10/24/2001 11:32:50 AM PDT by Hank Kerchief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: DCBryan1
I agree, whoever used the Anthrax on the US should be shown that we will strike back with nuclear retaliation.
97 posted on 10/24/2001 11:33:12 AM PDT by lovearkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blaster88
Thanks for the link. Sullivan's been shaking the Salon crowd.

We had the moral imperative 6 weeks ago.

98 posted on 10/24/2001 11:36:02 AM PDT by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
What if the people mailing these Anthrax strains are identified as members of Elf, Earth First and other green envirals who hate Americans? What will you response be?

No brainer. Drop them off in Afghanistan (of Iraq) first. Then start bombing.
99 posted on 10/24/2001 11:36:53 AM PDT by zencycler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dixierat22
Is revenge the only motivation we need for using nukes?

Evidently, you did not read Rep Buyer's remarks. He did not mention revenge as his motivation.

Nuclear weapons are part of our deterrence package. The implicit bargain we have with the world is "Don't use WMD on us, we won't use WMD on you." Rep Buyer says we need to back up that implicit deal, now that the other side has broken the terms of it.

The terrorists have proven that they will incrementally up the violence if they are not stopped. The WTC bombing in 93, the Khobar Towers bombing in 96, the East Africa embassy bombings in 98, the Cole bombing in 2000, were a ratcheting up of the war on the terrorist side. We did not respond in kind. We took ineffective military action in 98. The others were left as law enforcement matters, and we certainly did not get justice.

So now they have introduced WMD - anthrax, biological warfare - in attacks on the US. The fact that anthrax isn't terribly infectious, isn't contagious, and is treatable are not reasons to brush it off as a non-event. To do otherwise is to accept biological warfare as a condition of this war.

It is not a question of whether they will use WMD - they have. And we must make them pay the price so that they nor ANYONE ELSE whould ever think that they can use biological warfare on the US.

100 posted on 10/24/2001 11:39:45 AM PDT by blaster88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-155 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson