Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Freeper Sues Planned Parenthood
Freeper | October 23, 2001 | Saundra Duffy

Posted on 10/23/2001 1:46:49 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy

October is breast cancer awareness month. Did you know there's a LINK between abortion and breast cancer? The abortion industry doesn't want this information to be known. God forbid if women had all the facts; it would cut into their big fat PROFITS! Three of us California women are suing Planned Parenthood - not for money but for the truth. All we're asking is that Planned Parenthood tell women about this link. Evidence shows that women who have abortions, especially in their younger years, have a greater risk of developing breast cancer later in life. Thirteen out of fifteen U.S. studies show an increased risk of developing breast cancer in women who have had abortions.


TOPICS: Announcements; Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last
To: MadelineZapeezda
For what it's worth, she's denied the allegation (Madonna Horrified By Abortion Claim).
81 posted on 10/23/2001 7:34:47 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Great idea: Use tort terrorism against the hard left for a change.
82 posted on 10/23/2001 7:38:08 PM PDT by FReethesheeples
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Great job!!
83 posted on 10/23/2001 7:40:25 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaj
Epidemic of all sorts of cancer in fact. I know a guy just diagnosed with colon cancer. Perhaps Roe v Wade is responsible for that to?

Don't want to enter that arena! Might get pummeled with emotions that are trying to over-ride your introduction of common sense!

As if, when a mother comes in (knocked up, wanting to get rid of the baby in her) she'll suddenly realize that there is "a link" (gasp) between this and breast cancer...!

NOT!

Not when she's already there for a very specific reason. It's like telling someone (as they're unwrapping a piece of candy) it might give you a cavity... Granted, the levels of magnitude are vastly different, but the context is exactly the same...

FReegards.

84 posted on 10/23/2001 7:45:29 PM PDT by Capitalist Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy; Gdpleaser; hedgetrimmer
Prayers and a bump.
85 posted on 10/23/2001 10:20:06 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
More women have been killed by legal abortion than abortionists killed by pro-lifers.

By a wide margin, I would suspect.

86 posted on 10/23/2001 10:23:16 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
You are right.

Whatever the ends may be, there is more politics than science in the means.

87 posted on 10/23/2001 10:27:36 PM PDT by dieGewahlt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Admiration, support, and prayers for you.
88 posted on 10/23/2001 10:51:16 PM PDT by maranatha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Best of luck in your battle against evil.
89 posted on 10/23/2001 10:51:58 PM PDT by The Thin Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
The relationship between abortion and breast cancer has been the subject of extensive research. However, evidence of a direct relationship between breast cancer and either induced or spontaneous abortion is inconsistent. Some studies have indicated small elevations in risk, while others have not shown any risk associated with either induced or spontaneous abortions.

According to the research report I read, this is because most studies do not attempt to distinguish between first pregnancy abortions and other abortions. It is when the first pregnancy abortions are studied as a separate group that the link stands out.

However, I am mindful of the fact that Saccharin must carry a cancer warning because one experiment, which turns out to have been performed very badly, created a link between cancer and Saccharin. The link is very remote, currently under debate, but Saccharin must carry the warning because we are so concerned about cancer.

The link between breast cancer and abortion is better substantiated than the link between cancer and Saccharin. Why isn't there even a warning that there may be a link? Why is abortion treated as different than Saccharin? Is it possibly because the politics of abortion are more important than public health?

Shalom.

90 posted on 10/24/2001 5:48:26 AM PDT by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

Comment #91 Removed by Moderator

To: Kaj
You are the one comparing apples and oranges. There are many studies that suggest this abortion breast cancer link. I am sure there are suspected causes of colon cancer too but that is not my field of inquiry.

All BIG ABORTION states it's the anti-choice extremists trying to scare women from having abortions. I think the fox is guarding the hen house. Anti-choice extremists don't make any money off the misery of pregnant women and the remains of dead babies.

Anti-choice extremists have no conflict of interest. But it is obvious who does. The promoters, the enablers and the providers of abortion on demand for whatever reason at any time of during the gestation process of a developing newly created human being.

92 posted on 10/24/2001 7:11:26 AM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: carnivaljoe
Have you counted how many lawsuits BIG ABORTION presents in courts lately? Including lawsuits trying to override states' rights in regulating this depraved industry?
93 posted on 10/24/2001 7:13:03 AM PDT by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Comment #94 Removed by Moderator

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

Comment #96 Removed by Moderator

Comment #97 Removed by Moderator

To: rabidralph
National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, and such organizations, don't want to admit they've been wrong, and they don't want to be politically incorrect, so they continue the spin. But they are about to get trounced by angry women and good science. Just you wait! For victory & freedom!!!
98 posted on 10/24/2001 9:36:58 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
"The link between breast cancer and abortion is better substantiated than the link between cancer and Saccharin. Why isn't there even a warning that there may be a link? Why is abortion treated as different than Saccharin? Is it possibly because the politics of abortion are more important than public health?" All good questions! It has to do with control, money and political correctness. For victory & freedom!!!
99 posted on 10/24/2001 9:39:01 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: SiouxsieQ
"So that's why pro-choicers are out to make abortion available and safe in 3rd world countries." Please note: 3rd world countries are inhabited by DARK SKINNED people for the most part. Pro-choicers just love to abort ignorant, dark skinned people - rid the world of undesirables and make a profit in the process (2 birds with one stone). And these people are your heros? For victory & freedom!!!
100 posted on 10/24/2001 9:43:01 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson