Freeper Sues Planned Parenthood

Freeper | October 23, 2001 | Saundra Duffy

[CounterCounterCulture]

The slut had what.....11 abortions?

For what it's worth, she's denied the allegation (Madonna Horrified By Abortion Claim).

[FReethesheeples]

Great idea: Use tort terrorism against the hard left for a change.

[DouglasKC]

Great job!!

[Capitalist Eric]

Epidemic of all sorts of cancer in fact. I know a guy just diagnosed with colon cancer. Perhaps Roe v Wade is responsible for that to?

Don't want to enter that arena! Might get pummeled with emotions that are trying to over-ride your introduction of common sense!

As if, when a mother comes in (knocked up, wanting to get rid of the baby in her) she'll suddenly realize that there is "a link" (gasp) between this and breast cancer...!

NOT!

Not when she's already there for a very specific reason. It's like telling someone (as they're unwrapping a piece of candy) it might give you a cavity... Granted, the levels of magnitude are vastly different, but the context is exactly the same...

FReegards.

[farmfriend]

Prayers and a bump.

[Mark17]

More women have been killed by legal abortion than abortionists killed by pro-lifers.

By a wide margin, I would suspect.

[dieGewahlt]

You are right.

Whatever the ends may be, there is more politics than science in the means.

[maranatha]

Admiration, support, and prayers for you.

[The Thin Man]

Best of luck in your battle against evil.

[ArGee]

The relationship between abortion and breast cancer has been the subject of extensive research. However, evidence of a direct relationship between breast cancer and either induced or spontaneous abortion is inconsistent. Some studies have indicated small elevations in risk, while others have not shown any risk associated with either induced or spontaneous abortions.

According to the research report I read, this is because most studies do not attempt to distinguish between first pregnancy abortions and other abortions. It is when the first pregnancy abortions are studied as a separate group that the link stands out.

However, I am mindful of the fact that Saccharin must carry a cancer warning because one experiment, which turns out to have been performed very badly, created a link between cancer and Saccharin. The link is very remote, currently under debate, but Saccharin must carry the warning because we are so concerned about cancer.

The link between breast cancer and abortion is better substantiated than the link between cancer and Saccharin. Why isn't there even a warning that there may be a link? Why is abortion treated as different than Saccharin? Is it possibly because the politics of abortion are more important than public health?

Shalom.

[victim soul]

You are the one comparing apples and oranges. There are many studies that suggest this abortion breast cancer link. I am sure there are suspected causes of colon cancer too but that is not my field of inquiry.

All BIG ABORTION states it's the anti-choice extremists trying to scare women from having abortions. I think the fox is guarding the hen house. Anti-choice extremists don't make any money off the misery of pregnant women and the remains of dead babies.

Anti-choice extremists have no conflict of interest. But it is obvious who does. The promoters, the enablers and the providers of abortion on demand for whatever reason at any time of during the gestation process of a developing newly created human being.

[victim soul]

Have you counted how many lawsuits BIG ABORTION presents in courts lately? Including lawsuits trying to override states' rights in regulating this depraved industry?

[Saundra Duffy]

National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, and such organizations, don't want to admit they've been wrong, and they don't want to be politically incorrect, so they continue the spin. But they are about to get trounced by angry women and good science. Just you wait! For victory & freedom!!!

[Saundra Duffy]

"The link between breast cancer and abortion is better substantiated than the link between cancer and Saccharin. Why isn't there even a warning that there may be a link? Why is abortion treated as different than Saccharin? Is it possibly because the politics of abortion are more important than public health?" All good questions! It has to do with control, money and political correctness. For victory & freedom!!!

[Saundra Duffy]

"So that's why pro-choicers are out to make abortion available and safe in 3rd world countries." Please note: 3rd world countries are inhabited by DARK SKINNED people for the most part. Pro-choicers just love to abort ignorant, dark skinned people - rid the world of undesirables and make a profit in the process (2 birds with one stone). And these people are your heros? For victory & freedom!!!