Skip to comments.
FBI considers torture as suspects stay silent
The Times (U.K.) ^
| 10/22/2001
| DAMIAN WHITWORTH
Posted on 10/21/2001 5:43:35 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
1
posted on
10/21/2001 5:43:35 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Torture would be a violation of their civil rights.
2
posted on
10/21/2001 5:46:44 PM PDT
by
latrans
To: Pokey78
“We are known for humanitarian treatment, so basically we are stuck. Usually there is some incentive, some angle to play, what you can do for them. But it could get to that spot where we could go to pressure . . . where we don’t have a choice, and we are probably getting there,” an FBI agent involved in the investigation told the paper.Maybe we should try bribing them with 17 virgins.....geez, do we really think we'll get information from them by politically correct means????
3
posted on
10/21/2001 5:48:22 PM PDT
by
dubyagee
To: latrans
Yeah. And due process, too...
To: Pokey78
I believe the Mossad could also get them to talk.
To: Pokey78
Sorry, I can't go for physical torture of captives. Not sure I want the US government in the physical torture business.
A tank full of Jimmy Dean Pork Sausage however isn't really physically dangerous.
6
posted on
10/21/2001 5:50:31 PM PDT
by
Arkinsaw
To: Pokey78
Send in Hillary to do a strip tease. They'll lose their lunch and then spill the beans.
7
posted on
10/21/2001 5:50:39 PM PDT
by
DouglasKC
To: clintonh8r
Rather another 10,000 Americans get killed, than we should fail to read the scum every provision of their Miranda rights.
8
posted on
10/21/2001 5:51:00 PM PDT
by
BCrago66
To: Pokey78
Take them into Israeli embassy... Israeli soil... the laws are different there..
To: Pokey78
A careful reading of this story, and the quotes used to back it up, don't reveal any basis whatsoever for the main premise of the article.
10
posted on
10/21/2001 5:51:17 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Pokey78
I believe that it would be wrong for the FBI to use torture techniques to extract this information.
On the other hand, putting them in protective custody in the general population of a prison in New York State might be a good idea.
To: Pokey78
Use any means necessary. Go for it.
To: Pokey78
Who needs torture? Why not sodium pentathol or hypnosis? Neither are physically dangerous to the 'subject', but I don't know about the legality of it.
13
posted on
10/21/2001 5:52:08 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: Pokey78
I would think there are a number of creative uses for pork guts and skin that isn't painful or inhumane. Are you reading this Feds?
To: Tennessee_Bob
... accidents happen ...
15
posted on
10/21/2001 5:52:39 PM PDT
by
dighton
To: Pokey78
Threaten to turn them over to the Massad; that will loosen their slimy tongues!
To: Tennessee_Bob
Oh yeah ...there are no Muslims in NY prisons (Not a good idea Bob)
To: clintonh8r
ah ta hell with it
since the canucks are too polite and since W and fox are such good
buddies, why dont we send some of these folks down
to ol' mexico and see if our companeros down there can persude them
to sing a little.
18
posted on
10/21/2001 5:53:14 PM PDT
by
tamu
To: Pokey78
Leave them alone and tied up with Barbara Olsen's husband in the room with a large knife. The terrorist in that situation would be talking real quick.
To: Clinton's a rapist
Use of sodium pentathal is very painless, and maybe effective. I prefer the testicular vice method.
All DemocRATic and IsLAMEST lurkers please do not respond.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-147 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson