Truce

DU | 10/21/01 | gargoyle

[gargoyle]

...Been over at DU. Read a post, "Debate with Freepers" Thought you might check this out. I posted a reply, you figure out which one.

[gargoyle]

...Sounds logical and reasonable to me.

[Izzy Dunne]

Post a link next time.

[real saxophonist]

Truce? You remind me of a drum major who had absolutely no idea what she was doing. I told my tuba section, do not listen to anything she says, she has no idea what she's talking about. She pulled me aside later, and eventually got to the question: Truce? No, you don't know what you're doing. She eventually got fired...

[gargoyle]

...Fooking democratic underground! Obviously you haven't read about the oposition to FR!

[Teacher317]

Here's the thread in question.

Posts 2, 3, 4, and 17 are all you really need to read, where they attack Jim Robinson's education level, state that FReepers can't debate facts and only call names, and then go on to refuse to lower themselves to attempt communication.

You just have to laugh at a DU-er (DU-mmy? DUn-derhead? DemUn-s?) with the screen name like "comsymp"... Communist Sympathizer. LOL! Maybe you haven't read a history book in a while, my friend (comsymp), but Communism has been tried in several places, and has repeatedly been an abject failure at both the national and community (commune) levels... and they want a debate of the facts? ROFLMAO.

[socal_parrot]

Conversation sometimes leads to dancing. I don't think we need any of that around here.

[gargoyle]

...I didn't post this for you. I posted it for those here that have an OPENED MIND

...You can go back to blowing a tube, ahhh.

[Arkinsaw]

It would be an utterly pointless exercise. I've had enough debates with these folks on usenet and its just a pointless circle joik.

We are better off searching and finding good articles to post here rather than wasting time with the hopelessly lost. They will only be cured of their mania through experience.

[gargoyle]

...What about those that you didn't single out? Are they too, to be disavowed the First Amendment?

[clintonh8r]

Why bother?

[real saxophonist]

Well, darn. I really thought it was just for me. I guess it's only for those with an opened (sic) mind. Blow tube, ahhh? You sound like a string player.

[BonnieJ]

You need to choose a more intelligent site if you want a debate that could benefit anyone. That one is hopeless.

[Eagle Eye]

Greetings FRiends, gargoyle here in the commonwealth of Va. Fiscal conservative, social liberal, That makes me a libertarian.

No, that makes you a moron. Why don't you just stick to DU, and quit tracking dog crap in here at FR?

[clintonh8r]

The "debate" is over. Bush won. Bush won the election. The country is moving to the right as the politics of Boner Bill, Jesse Jackoff, Alice Gwhore and their gang are being rapidly discredited.

Any RATs lurking here, feel free to quote me on Dummy 6 feet Underground.

[real saxophonist]

Tell it to these guys (The Commandant's Own Marine Drum & bugle Corps). I'm sure we could accommodate you...

[clintonh8r]

Semper fi!

[Teacher317]

What about those that you didn't single out? Are they too, to be disavowed the First Amendment?

My, but you truly are a gargoyle. Can you please tell me where I posted a preference to deny First Amendment rights to anyone? I've frequently thought about a debate just like the one proposed. However, after reading their postings, it doesn't look like a realistic possibility. The only way to do it, in fact, would be to heavily Moderate the conversation. But that would just make you whine more about the First Amendment, so it doesn't look like it is possible at all.

You seem to be looking for "open-minded" poters here.
You ought to try a more mature approach yourself before you do so.

Think first. Post wisely and factually. Save your insults for a more appropriate venue.

[EggsAckley]

You just have to laugh at a DU-er (DU-mmy? DUn-derhead? DemUn-s?)

DU-FUS?

[Gadsden1st]

Cheddar or Blue??

[real saxophonist]

Roquefort?