Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OLD REGGIE
Lurker jumping in for a second. Mr. Old Reggie you say Mr. Soothing Dave is misrepresenting Sola Scriptura because the definition is 'scripture is paramount' not 'scripture is exclusive' But when Mr. SD uses a bible quote and historical records to help interpret, he is lambasted for being extra-biblical in his interpretation. If scripture is paramount; the use of history, context, language, to interpret should be acceptable under Sola Scriptura as long as the interpretation is not contrary to other parts of the bible. consistency in definition and application is needed on both sides. Lurker fading back into the backgroung...
2,601 posted on 10/24/2001 4:46:05 PM PDT by Joyful Wisdom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2583 | View Replies ]


To: Joyful Wisdom
. If scripture is paramount; the use of history, context, language, to interpret should be acceptable under Sola Scriptura as long as the interpretation is not contrary to other parts of the bible. consistency in definition and application is needed on both sides

Would you be surprised if I said I was in total agreement with this statement?

I wish you would, at least, step back in long enough to provide the instances where SD was accused of "extra Scriptural" interpretations.

Caveat: If I didn't accuse him I may not defend the accusation.
2,606 posted on 10/24/2001 6:28:42 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2601 | View Replies ]

To: Joyful Wisdom
Interpretation should include 3 criteria: literal, historical, grammatical.

Becky

2,619 posted on 10/24/2001 8:20:56 PM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2601 | View Replies ]

To: Joyful Wisdom
Good post. Post at anytime. Thanx. And this Proddie agrees (and Old Reggie would probably agree in principle).
2,626 posted on 10/24/2001 8:53:29 PM PDT by the808bass
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2601 | View Replies ]

To: the808bass
Proclaiming that Christ is your shepherd is of no practical consequence if, in fact, your doctrines, pastors, Bible interpretations, practices, etc., are determined by majority vote. Face it, the sheep are the ultimate authority in your church.

And the church councils of the Early Church did what? Play tiddlywinks? Just cause you voted a long time ago doesn't mean y'all didn't vote.

C'mon Bass. You know very well that the early councils were not general plebiscites. They were meetings of bishops, the successors to the Apostles. Not every Tom, Dick, and layman.

SD

2,657 posted on 10/25/2001 6:39:06 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2601 | View Replies ]

To: Joyful Wisdom
Since angelo is on sabbatical, I will issue the formal welcome to the group. Do feel free to share your thoughts when you wish.

As to your current point, I think that Reggie and I both agree with your definition. I am trying to point out the fatal flaw in terms of final authority and where it is vested.

SD

2,659 posted on 10/25/2001 6:41:43 AM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2601 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson