Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Neverending Story (The New Christian Chronicles)
Southern Baptists ending talks with Catholic Church ^ | 3/24/01 | AP

Posted on 10/15/2001 6:54:40 AM PDT by malakhi

The Neverending Story
An ongoing debate on Scripture, Tradition, History and Interpretation.


Statesmen may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue. - John Adams


Thread 162
TNS Archives


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: christianlist; michaeldobbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,201-2,2202,221-2,2402,241-2,260 ... 37,681-37,689 next last
To: angelo
Children have to do a lot of things their parents decide for them.

Are you available to teach my sons this rule?

2,221 posted on 10/23/2001 9:43:04 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2216 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I believe in the authority of the church as long as it lines up with scripture. Eating meat on Fri. is no where in the bible. In fact Jesus taught that fasting was a free choice thing and should be done with no show, quietly, secertly so as not to draw attention to the act.

Becky

2,222 posted on 10/23/2001 9:44:56 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2218 | View Replies]

To: allend
God never said don't eat meat on Fri. the religion did.

What part of, "Whatever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven," do you not understand?

Great. The catholic church bound beef for a few years. What a tremendous contribution to Christendom. You should be proud.

2,223 posted on 10/23/2001 9:45:41 AM PDT by Invincibly Ignorant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2214 | View Replies]

To: dignan3
And the RSV, Catholic edition, retains the traditional(1600 years old) translation. So I guess we do have a modern translation that renders kecharitomene as "full of grace"

I wasn't aware the RSV, Catholic edition differed from the RSV except it also had the Apocrypha. I found references in GOOGLE to a 1966 RSV Catholic Edition but could find no online editions. (For free, that is.) Since I have no intention of purchasing one, could you point to an online source?

I did find this reference which seems to indicate the addition of footnotes is the difference between versions:

The New Vulgate (Nova Vulgata) was done by our Current Pope John Paul II, this is the RSV Catholic Edition containing footnotes of the Ancient Vulgate of St. Jerome. The Ancient Vulgate was used for 390 years and was the only English Catholic bible ever used. To learn more about the oldest bible for English Speaking Catholics you can purchase a book called Which Bible Should You Read? by Thomas A. Nelson not the same Thomas Nelson who is a protestant publisher. TAN Publishers carries the book. It was the only bible used in the liturgy of the mass. Today however we know use the Nova Vulgata in the liturgy of the mass. This book does contain in its foot notes the missing links in its footnotes, and that is why when one purchases the RSV make sure it is the Catholic Edition, because it contains foot note to the oldest Bible the Catholic Church has. God Bless you and may His light and love strengthen you and guide you into all truth through the Authority of the Catholic Church.
===========================

I am still confused.
2,224 posted on 10/23/2001 9:51:04 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2103 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Who said anything about God nullifying Mary's ability to sin? She was born without Original Sin, but that doesn't make sin impossible. Or Adam and Eve never would have sinned. One day I wish you would drop your insufferable attitude and actually listen.

What you all call original sin we call sin nature. And Mary most certainly did have it. Saying she didn't is tampering with God's word. The Sin nature is a result of the seperation of Man from the spiritual by God. Man can no longer see the spiritual and is stuck in the physical or 'natural' now. That is the fallen state. Man sees and operates in the carnal only - unless either God or Satan intervenes. Mary had the same nature as the rest of mankind.

Me: You have no idea what you are saying - do you?! Blasphemy. Pure and simple Blasphemy. God CHOSE Mary because she had kept herself free from sin and lived righteously. God didn't break his own laws and transgress Mary's rights or those of the Devil in order to bring Christ into the world.

You:
First you tell God what He can not do (nullify Mary's ability to sin) then you speak of the "rights" of the Devil. Wrong has no rights.

First of all, God made the rules and he goes by them just as we do. If he didn't - he wouldn't be a just God. Argue with that!

Secondly, The Devil does have rights. He has jurisdiction over anyone that is not one of God's Sheep. God has agreed to do things a certain way in Covenant with man. And all three parties have defined rights in that covenant. God deciding that satan didn't have rights to tempt Mary in any fashion would be a violation of the Covenant - breaking the rules. God doesn't break his rules or his promises - that is something that Man and the Devil do. God is Just.

God prepared Mary for her role, but He did not remove her free will. She had no Original Sin, but she was still free to sin personally. Which she did not. Though I am sure that she had God's help in avoiding sin in her life.

Oh, I see. He protected her from the sin nature by not allowing her to have it. Basically just violated his own rules in order to bring Jesus on the scene within the rules. Uhu. Anymore bright ideas? I know this just glances off of you because you don't understand it; but, God doesn't break his rules so that you can define dogmas that you like.

Honestly, man. If we said that Mary avoided sin all on her own, which you seem to be saying, then there would be no need for a Savior and you would rip me for that.

Mary did avoid sin all on her own, it's called refusing to partake in it and leading a righteous life. And in the event that she did sin, it required following the sacrificial system for purification from her sin. She met those obligations and led a righteous life. That is the only way she could be without sin under the old system. You guys need magic acts and such because she has to be polished once you get her on the pedastal. Once again, in a race to build a more believeable pile of garbage, Catholicism just up and defines doctrine to make it's other doctrines seem right. Polishing lies with Blasphemy may seem right to you, but it enrages me.

If we say that Mary needed special assistance from God to remain sinless you rip us for saying God violated the devil's "rights" and turned Mary into a slave.

Nobody needed special assistance in the old days to live a righteous life - they just needed to obey God. The same is true today, with the caviat now of accepting Christ rather than heeding the old sacrificial system. Ya'll act like there was no such thing as a righteous person before Jesus came along. You can't really be that dumb.

There's no pleasing some people who are already pleased with themselves.

When you're selling spraypainted bricks for Gold, you're right. I'm not going to be pleased with your Bricks. When you blaspheme God in the midst of selling a fraud, don't expect me to be Mr. understanding.

2,225 posted on 10/23/2001 9:55:01 AM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2041 | View Replies]

To: angelo
God is eternal; He cannot die. Jesus died. Therefore, Jesus was not God.

ANGELO !! ha ha. Actually, I started to order the statements that way last night when I wrote them, I thought of you, and changed it!!!

2,226 posted on 10/23/2001 9:56:08 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2107 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
OK, so your Church doesn't claim to have the power to bind and loose. Mine does. That doesn't change the point that you implicated all Catholics in "vain repetition" when your co-religionists also engage in (freely willed) repetition.

All the apostles were given the authority to bind or loose, it's just that some chose not to use it as a bully pulpit for control.

Freely willed repetition, Lol, that sounds so SD.

We all fight vain repetition every day, I have no special words when I ask a blessing on a meal, and if you eat three times a day, how can you ask for a blessing and give thanks 21 different times a week, with out it becoming a Yada Yada, kiss kiss, type thing?

I simply say what comes out of my heart at the time, sometimes I start by saying "Dear Lord", sometimes by saying "our heavenly Father", sometimes "Our Father in heaven", and by starting with a different title every time, all the prayers then seem to lead in a different direction every time.

If I notice that I am repeating the same thing over and over, I purposely try to add new subjects into it so it requires me to consciously think of what I’m saying,

” Freely willed repetition” then is good, if it’s not vain repetition, and if it is coming from your heart and not just your mouth.

2,227 posted on 10/23/2001 9:56:40 AM PDT by JHavard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2202 | View Replies]

To: angelo
C'mon, are those types of comments really necessary?

Are you familiar with cats? If so, have you seen one do something stupid such as fall off a table. They pretend they did it on purpose, stick their tail up in the air, and saunter off.

Sometimes Dave does something very similar. He will make an utterly rediculous statement and, when called on it, he will pretend it was done on purpose. I think Dave understood very well I meant the remark in jest. (I certainly hope so.)
2,228 posted on 10/23/2001 9:58:07 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2083 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
Whose gain? Read for comprehension much?

Yep, sure do. And apart from Giving birth, Mary has not one whit to do with salvation. Zero. Zilch. Zip. Nada.. She is not diety, not the creator of a God, not a 'Co' anything. God didn't give her any special place in the scheme of things beyond carrying a child to term. From there on out, all your Doctrine is manufactured by the RCC. I comprehend quite a bit. Get the Spirit of God and you can too.

2,229 posted on 10/23/2001 10:00:07 AM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2042 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I realize you probably don't think they apply to you because you are "saved," but most Christians try to adhere to them.

Typical. And is all I see lately is the charge of "Anti-catholic," "Everyone is so mean to us poor catholic's," blah, blah, blah. LOOK AT THE WAY YOU ARE ANSWERING. Why should we like you when you won't even answer a question let alone say it civilly.

What happened to the people who ate meat on Fri. when it was a sin? How can it be fair to change rules in mid-stream? Why do you not consider it "works" when it is a made up rule by the church, that can be found no where in God's word, but will send you to hell?

"sigh" As far as the 10 commandments, those are God's laws. They serve a purpose. They show us our sins. Fasting from meat on Fri. shows us nothing. I keep the 10 because God said if you love me you will keep my commandments. I do them because I love him and feel grateful to him for saving me, NOT TO GET SAVED.

Becky

2,230 posted on 10/23/2001 10:00:59 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2220 | View Replies]

To: angelo
"Jesus, the son of Mary, is God".

Yes, He definitely is: the God/man, Christ Jesus. "Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, a virgin will be with child and bear a son, and she will call His name Immanuel [GOD WITH US]." Isa. 7:14 Amen.

2,231 posted on 10/23/2001 10:01:47 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2108 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I realize you probably don't think they apply to you because you are "saved," but most Christians try to adhere to them.

Typical. And is all I see lately is the charge of "Anti-catholic," "Everyone is so mean to us poor catholic's," blah, blah, blah. LOOK AT THE WAY YOU ARE ANSWERING. Why should we like you when you won't even answer a question let alone say it civilly.

What happened to the people who ate meat on Fri. when it was a sin? How can it be fair to change rules in mid-stream? Why do you not consider it "works" when it is a made up rule by the church, that can be found no where in God's word, but will send you to hell?

"sigh" As far as the 10 commandments, those are God's laws. They serve a purpose. They show us our sins. Fasting from meat on Fri. shows us nothing. I keep the 10 because God said if you love me you will keep my commandments. I do them because I love him and feel grateful to him for saving me, NOT TO GET SAVED.

Becky

2,232 posted on 10/23/2001 10:02:18 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2220 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave
I realize you probably don't think they apply to you because you are "saved," but most Christians try to adhere to them.

Typical. And is all I see lately is the charge of "Anti-catholic," "Everyone is so mean to us poor catholic's," blah, blah, blah. LOOK AT THE WAY YOU ARE ANSWERING. Why should we like you when you won't even answer a question let alone say it civilly.

What happened to the people who ate meat on Fri. when it was a sin? How can it be fair to change rules in mid-stream? Why do you not consider it "works" when it is a made up rule by the church, that can be found no where in God's word, but will send you to hell?

"sigh" As far as the 10 commandments, those are God's laws. They serve a purpose. They show us our sins. Fasting from meat on Fri. shows us nothing. I keep the 10 because God said if you love me you will keep my commandments. I do them because I love him and feel grateful to him for saving me, NOT TO GET SAVED.

Becky

2,233 posted on 10/23/2001 10:02:53 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2220 | View Replies]

To: IMRight
Are you available to teach my sons this rule?

LOL! Well, mine are still small, so its a little easier to put principle into practice.

2,234 posted on 10/23/2001 10:03:39 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2221 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Sorry for the multiple post, this thing is not working well today.

Becky

2,235 posted on 10/23/2001 10:04:24 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2233 | View Replies]

To: angelo
I believe that there is One Truth. For Faith to be true, it must point to that Truth. For Reason to be true, it must point to that Truth. Ultimately, therefore, faith and reason must be compatible. This does not mean that reason can prove to you everything that you know by faith.

Interesting. But Angelo, about the first sentence--- how would you sum up the "One Truth"?

2,236 posted on 10/23/2001 10:06:38 AM PDT by hopefulpilgrim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2110 | View Replies]

To: Steven
Amen.

Becky

2,237 posted on 10/23/2001 10:06:59 AM PDT by PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2223 | View Replies]

To: PayNoAttentionManBehindCurtain
Maybe you and Quix should start a club.
2,238 posted on 10/23/2001 10:07:42 AM PDT by IMRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2235 | View Replies]

Comment #2,239 Removed by Moderator

To: al_c
but they can only reap the benefits of it if they ACCEPT it.

al_c:
So, God's grace is limited?

Dang skippy! You don't accept salvation, you don't got salvation. If you want to call that limiting grace, then it's dang sure limited - and By God - not man.

2,240 posted on 10/23/2001 10:09:00 AM PDT by Havoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,201-2,2202,221-2,2402,241-2,260 ... 37,681-37,689 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson