Posted on 10/10/2001 2:35:17 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache
I do not know whether this has been posted here through another source or is being pulled in threads or not. But through military sources and a private document I saw with my own eyes 2 names have been listed as the leak to the Washington Post. p> Sen. Orrin Hatch Republican from Utah and Senator Diane Feinstein Democrat from California. If this is pulled I will understand. This source is 100% accurate. I am currently writing a piece on our national security at this current time for one of the papers I write for. This is bound to come out soon. So I figured I would post this here first.
The leaker was John McCain. Before that, it was Orrin Hatch.
McCain is simply trying to pay up on his deal for favorable press coverage throughout the election.
In case anyone noticed; his TV appearances have gone way down in the past few weeks.
This was likely a desparation ploy on his part to stay relevant after Dubya has gotten such high approval ratings.
The only reason McCain's name is not being mentioned, is because no one knows how he would react to the embarrassment. He might blow his top and do more damage than he has already done.
Dont bother asking me how I know, I just do
Go to:http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3bc39dfc6a1b.htm if you want to check.
Maybe the editor should teach him how to write a coherent and grammatical sentence.
I am not going to respond to every post on here. But the sentence you quoted here was taken in a conversational post to an internet forum. I will from here on out write to your liking :)
I believe you spell h-o-a-x maybe as " Anthrax found in IRS building", or maybe "Anthrax found in Naples" . Hoax is a common word around here. I would not go out of my way to waste everybody's time here on a forum I respect as much as I do with a HOAX. I have too much respect for the site and the members in which I am very good friends with off the site to waste time here.
P, I can. Hatch does NOT make "mistakes" like this. He is VERY purposeful. Peace and love, George.
Don't toss out your common sense people, or you may find yourself on the wrong side of a lawsuit.
With the right to post on the Internet, or anywhere else, comes the responsibility for what one posts.
The DemocRATS wouldn't mind going after Hatch, but won't because they would have to go after DiFi to. However you are right on the mark.
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,330007310,00.html?
LOL!!
So if your information is correct then Feinstein would be the one who recently leaked to the Washington Post.
HANG 'EM...AND HANG 'EM HIGH!!!
This doesn't have to do with the leaking, but I was appalled last night to see Loretta Sanchez is a member of the House Intelligence Committee. How on earth could that be? She is new to Congress and a lying airhead. Someone tell me how this happened? Can you imagine she hears our most sensitive information and takes part in decisions made by that committee? God help us.
Unfortunately it doesn't work that way. The Congress, each house separately, decides who can see what. Actually it's worse than that, if any Congresscritter asks for specific information, it must be provided. Not the the staff of course, but to the Congress critter itself. Back in the good old days when RR was President I was told as part of a "compartment" in-briefing that if Red Ron Dellumns came into our vault and asked to see something in particular, we had to show it to him. And he had to be let into the vault in the first place. The only check on the Congress Critters is the Congress itself, which may and has agreed to only provide certain information to a very limited number of folks.
I don't think our President quite understood this, but I suspect he does now, and has apparently worked it out with the Congressional "Leadership", such as it is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.