Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UK forces joining attack (WITH YOU AT THE FIRST, WITH YOU TO THE LAST, AMERICA)
BBC ^ | October 7, 2001 | BBC

Posted on 10/07/2001 11:15:10 AM PDT by MadIvan

UK forces are involved in the military attacks on Afghanistan, it has been confirmed. US President George W Bush confirmed UK involvement as he said in a White House address that the US had begun military action. "We are joined in this operation by our staunch friend, Great Britain," he said.

Downing Street also confirmed that British forces are taking part in the operation.

"We can confirm that British forces are engaged in the military action that has begun against targets in Afghanistan," the Prime Minister's spokesman said.

UK Prime Minister Tony Blair is due to make a statement at 10 Downing Street shortly.

Cruise missiles

It was reported on the US television channel CNN that cruise missiles had been fired from British and American ships.

About 24 British Royal Navy warships as well as 23,000 British troops are in the region.

They had been sent there before the 11 September US attacks for long-planned exercises with the Omanis, known as Saif Sareea 2.

The leader of the opposition Conservative party, Iain Duncan Smith, said he would make a statement after he had spoken to Downing Street.

It is possible that the Conservative party conference, for which MPs whad been gathering in Blackpool on Sunday, may be cancelled.

Story 2:

Blair pays tribute to British forces

Prime Minister Tony Blair paid tribute to the British forces in action in Afghanistan saying they were "amongst the best in the world".

Mr Blair praised the "courageous" soldiers whose "sense of duty" is renowned "throughout the world".

It has been confirmed that British missile-firing submarines are in action against Afghanistan.

Mr Blair said: "There are dangers in action, but there are also dangers in inaction and those dangers are far far greater.

He moved to reassure people that Britain itself was not under-threat, saying: "There is no specific credible threat to the British people."

He also said that efforts were being made to help refugees displaced by the conflict.

"We are assembling a coalition for refugees from Afghanistan, which is as important as the military action.

"Britain is heavily involved in that humanitarian action."

Mr Blair said: "This is not a war against Islam. It angers me to hear bin Laden described as Islamic terrorist. They are terrorists pure and simple.

Menzies Campbell, Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said: "These operations have become inevitable.

"The Taleban have been given every opportunity to give up bin Laden and withdraw support from his terrorist network.

"Under international law these are legitimate targets. Every effort must be made to minimise civilian casualties."

"Once again the lives of the brave men and women of Britain's armed services are at risk. We wish them a safe return," Mr Campbell continued.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last
To: MadIvan
I believe there are, in essence, two Blairs - the Socialist part and the Winston part. You are seeing the Winston part come out right now.

This means he is different from Clinton because Clinton had no shining moments whatsoever.


BULLS-EYE! Good shot!. . .

61 posted on 10/07/2001 2:04:01 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
BULLS-EYE! Good shot!. . .

I've had enough practice at doing so. ;)

Regards, Ivan
62 posted on 10/07/2001 2:05:22 PM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Thanks for the flag. I've been watching this all day.

GOD bless the American and British troops. Shoulder to shoulder and from the beginning, until the end , together we fight on the side of righteousness. We shall win !

63 posted on 10/07/2001 2:09:07 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
The balloon has gone up. Action now.

Thanks, Britain! Great to have you on our side.

64 posted on 10/07/2001 2:17:05 PM PDT by LibKill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
God save the Queen.
65 posted on 10/07/2001 2:23:16 PM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NMC EXP
Have you missed the President's speech on September 20, and his address to the nation today?

Today we focus on Afghanistan, but the battle is broader. Every nation has a choice to make. In this conflict, there is no neutral ground. If any government sponsors the outlaws and killers of innocence, they have become outlaws and murderers themselves. And they will take that lonely path at their own peril.

Terrorism does not just grow. Umpteen billion angry Muslims does not = terrorism with global reach capable of mass destruction. States are the missing part of the equation, and I think Bush sent a pretty clear message that the party with terror-sponsoring states is still on the schedule.

66 posted on 10/07/2001 2:29:20 PM PDT by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
You know, I think I probably first read those words of Churchill's thirty years ago or thirty-five - and I must have heard them hundreds of times since - and they never fail to send chills up and down my spine.
67 posted on 10/07/2001 2:32:18 PM PDT by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southern Federalist;NMC EXP;ALL
Have you missed the President's speech on September 20, and his address to the nation today?. . .

Terrorism does not just grow. Umpteen billion angry Muslims does not = terrorism with global reach capable of mass destruction. States are the missing part of the equation, and I think Bush sent a pretty clear message that the party with terror-sponsoring states is still on the schedule.


Here's a link to his address today, for anyone that might be interested:

Statement by the President - The Attack on Taliban Begins

68 posted on 10/07/2001 3:01:37 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; NMC EXP
Everytime this question comes up, I find it helpful to ask what will happen if we don't take out OBL. We know eachsucceeding attack will become more gruesome and henious. We know the terrorists will be emboldened further because they are not capable of feeling compassion or shame. We know that having them strike outin haste and anger carries less risk than letting them plot their own course and timing. Most of all, we know it is more blessed to give than to receive.
69 posted on 10/07/2001 4:45:52 PM PDT by Vigilanteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
"I believe there are, in essence, two Blairs - the Socialist part and the Winston part. You are seeing the Winston part come out right now.

This means he is different from Clinton because Clinton had no shining moments whatsoever." "

That's it in a nutshell...and no matter how the FOB's try to spin it, he would've NEVER shined no matter what came on "his watch".....because he lacked the very essence of a leader - character.

I'm praying for all our brave military, US and UK and all the other allies....We must keep them in our prayers, and do our part being alert, vigilant and supportive!

70 posted on 10/07/2001 4:58:57 PM PDT by SunnyUsa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
All I ask is a willing Foe, and sea room...

Bump for the RN's Sub-Tomahawks!

71 posted on 10/07/2001 10:13:14 PM PDT by Chemist_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Your "Sky News" has been on Fox News for the last couple of hours. So far, I've wanted to puke a few times...

They've received "thousands" of Emails from America they say... Of about 6 they've read on air, 2 were "ashamed of America" and two said they wanted Blair for President...

Real balanced reporting…

They had two "PM's" on and both said we should not have started bombing now… That is was "wrong, wrong, wrong"…

They had a British "Muslim Leader" on that said we shouldn't have bombed them, that we should have used "other" means… Only the UN had legal authority…

So far they haven't had a single pro West person on… Not one in the last two freeking hours…

72 posted on 10/08/2001 2:11:54 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: DB
So far they haven't had a single pro West person on… Not one in the last two freeking hours…

I'm usually an ITN Digital man, so I can't really comment. I did watch Sky earlier today and it seemed OK - I guess it was before the talking heads came on.

Regards, Ivan
73 posted on 10/08/2001 2:19:59 AM PDT by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
Proud to be in battle with you!
74 posted on 10/08/2001 5:47:35 PM PDT by StoneColdGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson