1 posted on
10/02/2001 8:33:57 AM PDT by
Starmaker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
To: Starmaker
I'm also a very responsible, HIV [negative], STD free, monogamous fag." I wonder if his butt buddy is also a monogamous fag...
2 posted on
10/02/2001 8:40:28 AM PDT by
rface
To: Starmaker
Disgusting
To: Starmaker
no homosexual can be absolutely sure he's free from HIV infection Of course, no heterosexual can be 100% sure either, unless he has been monogamous or celibate for a couple of decades. When did you have your last HIV test? Are you 100% certain that every partner you have been with has been HIV negative?
Scary stuff...
4 posted on
10/02/2001 8:43:57 AM PDT by
van_erwin
To: Starmaker
They don't care if the kill other people.
To: Starmaker
Their blood will be screened out anyway. I recently read a story where lots of people who donated blood since 9/11 have been notified that the blood they gave tested positive for Hepatitus, and they never knew they were infected. The point of the story was that people were giving from the goodnes of their hearts, and it was hard for those taking the blood to later inform them of their situations.
6 posted on
10/02/2001 8:48:37 AM PDT by
peteram
To: Starmaker
This can't be real.
To: Starmaker
Sounds like conspiracy to commit murder to me!
9 posted on
10/02/2001 8:52:17 AM PDT by
Falcon4.0
To: Starmaker
This is VERY irresponsible. I can understand that a lot of people (including gays) want to contribute something to the war effort (or whatever you want to call this crisis) but this - even the mere suggestion that gays are being told and are willing to deliberately contaminate the blood bank supply - can spread even more fear than talk about Taliban germ warfare.
11 posted on
10/02/2001 9:02:14 AM PDT by
DonQ
To: Starmaker
Great move for the New Butt Order (NBO) ... and they wonder why "homophobes" don't like them?
To: Starmaker
"The [Red Cross] rule is based on homophobic stereotypes.
. . .yes it is always nasty homophobes with their stereotypes causing problems. Forget about statistics and the probabilities of tainted blood. . .Why go there?
Why must must so many 'homosexuals' act as their own worst enemy? Suggestions like this, and the kind of morbidly ill-will judgement it advises, will not improve their stereotyped image.
On the contrary. . .
15 posted on
10/02/2001 9:36:34 AM PDT by
cricket
To: Starmaker
This person is no less a terrorist than Bin Laden's thugs are.
To: Starmaker
Any scumbag caught doing this needs to face the death penalty, just like any other terrorist.
To: Starmaker
"But I'm also a very responsible, HIV [negative], STD free, monogamous fag."
Wonder if his partner is monogamous?
To: Starmaker
All the blood is tested. Big deal.
To: Starmaker
What this is News?
21 posted on
10/02/2001 9:46:22 AM PDT by
bluetoad
To: Starmaker
22 posted on
10/02/2001 9:50:13 AM PDT by
kcvl
To: Starmaker
Hey, let them donate blood! Just use it exclusively for their homosexual friends.
To: Starmaker
I read an article the other day stating there is several groups of people at the Red Cross that are calling the 'after the attack' blood donors to tell them they are HIV +, have Hepatitis or Syphilis. Sheesh! Apparently, there is an astonishing amount of donors who are infected. The CDC has been brought in to investigate further.
Wow! What a case study!
27 posted on
10/02/2001 9:56:33 AM PDT by
BossLady
To: Starmaker
Nuke him too!
To: Starmaker
This is one dumb Mother "F"er. What is his point?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson