First of all, I didn't take your reply as a flame to me, the poster ... and you are right - everyone has a right to post an opinion as to a news source's worthiness (in that regard, for instance, I am slowly changing in some of my opinions on "Judicial Watch" as a news source because of suspicions passed on to me by others here at FR.) I welcome valid news source "suspicions" since, to me, ALL Media needs to be looked at with a "jandous eye."
However, althought recognizing and supporting your right to do so and perhaps your past reasons in believing as you do (not yet known), I am questioning your claim that NewsMax has in this case "titled the article in it's predictable sensationalist manner"
Anyone can read every word from the title given as directly taken right from the Government document not only cited but posted ... i.e.:
- it is a US issued Declaration
- it is a declaration of Emergency
- it is an Emergency for Mad Cow Disease
Therefore it is difficult for anyone to agree with your rationale given for complaining about the "source" on this of all articles referenced by them.
What I base my opinion of NewsMAx on is the way they build a story completely off of suspicions or hypathetical situations. I can't tell you how many times I have read how we were about to be bombed by China, or how General "such-n-such" has determined that N. Korea will Nuke us in the coming years. I personally feel this is an irresponsible way of reporting news or so called news, and this is why I don't trust their reporting