IMHO, Newsmax was founded by one of the greatest journalists of the 90s, Chris Ruddy, author of the highly controversial and heavilly documented, "Strange Death of Vince Foster", and the journalist who had documented the most amazing coverup expose in all history, the Strange Death of Ron Brown.
I admit that Ruddy doesn't appear to be doing much of worth lately. Perhaps he is writing a book. Perhaps he is turning cynical that people can't quite get themselves to look at his mountain of evidence with open eyes. But to compare his work with the National Enquirer, I think that is very unfair. I see you have a beef, and like another poster asked, Where's the beef? What is innacurate? What makes newsmax.com as goofy as the Enquirer? You think that comparing mad cow disease with this should make newsmax.com comparable with the Enquirer? Give me a break. That is, IMHO, an excuse, a feather light excuse at that.
Baseless insults are a sign of fuzzy thinking.