Posted on 09/28/2001 1:03:58 PM PDT by VinnyTex
The Sorrow of Bill Clinton By John J. Miller & Ramesh Ponnuru |
No president obsessed over his "legacy" as much as Bill Clinton did. He sometimes complained that he had no enormous national crisis to contend with, meaning that he didn't have a fair shot at attaining historic greatness. "The first thing I had to start with was, you know, we don't have a war," he told the New York Times in 1997. "We don't have a depression, we don't have a Cold War." Poor guy. He never really had a chance. Some of us worried whether he was up to handling Haiti, never mind a global crisis. It's no surprise, however, that he's in a funk now, as his successor is being lauded for his handling of a national catastrophe, praised for delivering one of the great speeches in American history, and hurtled into stratospheric levels of popularity according to the opinion polls that Clinton so treasured during his tenure. Today's New York Times describes Clinton as lamenting that such a thing didn't happen on his watch. Richard L. Berke reports, "A close friend of Mr. Clinton put it this way: 'He has said there has to be a defining moment in a presidency that really makes a great president. He didn't have one.'" More than 6,000 people die to terrorism, and Bill Clinton still thinks it's all about him.
Part of the reason is the bipartisan sentiment that the president should be free to conduct foreign policy. Trade liberalization tends to be achieved by strong presidents overcoming congressional parochialism and logrolling. When presidents are weak, protectionism surges. It was after the Reagan administration was crippled by Iran-contra that Dick Gephardt was able to pass legislation authorizing retaliatory tariffs against countries deemed to be "unfair traders." And it was a sign of Clinton's second-term weakness that he was unable to win trade-promotion authority (then called "fast track"). President Bush's political strength has, of course, increased dramatically since September 11. Bill Thomas, the chairman of the ways and means committee, has made passage more likely by reaching a compromise with New Democrats. The compromise includes some provisions on labor and the environment. But as Brink Lindsey, a trade analyst at the Cato Institute, notes, that should not be a red flag to free-market advocates so long as the language is "hortatory not mandatory." Since we're not going to be able to get other countries to sign a global free-trade deal with such conditions, there's no reason for Bush's trade negotiators to take the labor-and-environment provisions too seriously. A more serious problem is that the compromise asks negotiators to protect the country's egregious "anti-dumping" laws, which target countries that commit the crime of selling products to us too cheaply. This demand should be softened: Negotiators could be asked to safeguard the goals of anti-dumping laws, such as they are, without necessarily committing to the laws themselves. But at least the compromise ignores the proposal of Democrat Max Baucus, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, that the president's authority not extend to any deal that would require a change in American laws which would abort negotiations before they even start. The global economy could use trade liberalization at the moment, not that it's relevant to the political dynamics on the Hill. After the attacks, currency markets saw the typical flight to safety which hit the economies of Latin America, especially Brazil and by extension Argentina, hard. As Mark Falcoff of the American Enterprise Institute has noted, the continent is already backsliding from democracy. We don't need instability to our south right now, or demands for U.S. aid. Wisconsin congressman Paul Ryan, an increasingly influential voice in Republican economic-policy debates, thinks trade-promotion authority can pass. "It's important for the economy, and it's important for national security," he says. "We have no choice. We've got to pass this. It's too important." |
With Billyboy in charge of this, becuase he ruined his own credibility, we would question if Osama actually did it for Hitlery, so Hitlery could get even with Barbara Olsen.
We can only thanks God that fool wasn't in charge of this, becuase I think we would have blamed him more than we would have relied on him
He IS the enemy - he cannot protect us,,,
(PING))))))
Let's hope God will give us time, and tools, to help us save our country. As long as the news & entertainment industry love & worship this rotter, we'll never be safe from further depridations by him & his, err, wife....
Clinton and his entourage were stuck into the back of a C-17 cargo plane, in a bunch of webbed, harness-like seats along the side of the plane. Clinton himself was jammed between the side wall of the aircraft and a large piece of military equipment that was being transported back to the U.S. The roar of the engines in the cargo area was deafening. The person who related this story was a member of Clinton's group and asked not to be identified. They were all laughing into their armpits at Clinton's predicament because of the way he had always treated military personnel when he was president.
Meanwhile, there were a couple of extra seats in the cockpit that were left unoccupied during the flight.
If my information is correct, that flight from Australia to Washington took a total of 15 hours, and Clinton had to sit there with his fat @ss jammed into that seat the whole time.
God bless President George W. Bush.
LOL!! I noticed he looked gaunt while hugging every woman he could find in NYC when he got there before W! I wonder if that trip caused that big zit on his nose or if he got that from some Aussie brothel.
Tell that to the residents and victims' families of the Oklahoma City Bombing. He used that tragedy to inflict a second term upon us.
Fortunately, Billy Graham stole the day. clintbilly stole the election.
Thank the Lord for George W Bush.
He most certainly DOES have a defining moment! That very moment when he wagged his pasty girly finger at us 'defined' him to a T !
And I'm pretty sure Mrs and Mr Streisand would say EVERY day of slick's presidency great.
Well what does he call Monica-gate, travel-gate, whitewater-gate...? If you ask me, he had several defining moments.
Just follow the logic.
I am grateful and thank the Lord The SCUMBAG didn't have a significant problem during his watch.
Who could ever forget Bill's defining moment(s)?
"I didn't inhale."
"I never had sex with that woman, Miss Lewinski."
"It all depends on what the meaning of 'is' is."
One good lie deserved another.
Pathetic as he was as a president, he was an even more pathetic human being.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.