To: JohnHuang2
Bump!
2 posted on
09/26/2001 11:23:07 PM PDT by
LoveMyRC
To: JohnHuang2
Frown of a Senator in crisis: "What's eating Hillary Clinton?" Michael Savage said he thought that she was seeing her 2004 presidential hopes go up in smoke. I hope so, for she is truly evil, but evil or not, she would still stand a chance of winning. That does not speak well for the American people does it?
3 posted on
09/26/2001 11:28:25 PM PDT by
Mark17
To: JohnHuang2
Maybe she's just feeling lonely as a result of the 24-hour visibility. Maybe the question should be: "Who's not eating Hillary Clinton?"
To: JohnHuang2
Bumpity bump. Michele was on Fox with Shep today about this. She is very open and not intimidated by the fact people could question her perceptions, not that anyone who is not blind would not draw the same conclusions after seeing Hitlery's jarring discordant antics.
To: JohnHuang2
That would be a rottweiler.
To: JohnHuang2
How about Hillary and Osama Bin Laden get married? They would make the perfect couple of hate. P. S. I don't like either one of them. It's hard to decide which one I dislike more.
9 posted on
09/26/2001 11:52:08 PM PDT by
garyhope
To: JohnHuang2
I just hope and pray that her behavior didn't go unnoticed by the people of New York! They're the ones who can rid us all of this creature. I think Giuliani should be encouraged to run for Senate against Hitlery! He'd win in a heartbeat!
11 posted on
09/27/2001 12:11:58 AM PDT by
brat
To: JohnHuang2
"What's eating Hillary Clinton?"
Do you really want to know?
To: JohnHuang2
This is a no-brainer ---
Hillary only comes alive for a fight. Low down and dirty politics.
Like Bill, Hillary is a sociopath. She has no empathy for others. She has no use for people, --- she uses people. She's so self-centered, that tragedy is her enemy, unless she can be the victim.
13 posted on
09/27/2001 12:28:25 AM PDT by
onyx
To: JohnHuang2
She's just steamed at the fact that bin laden is so rich and she can't sell him a pardon.
To: JohnHuang2
Hillary is caught on the horns of a dilemna. Should she openly exult in a successful attack on the USA by her natural allies, the totalitarian, leftist, America-haters, or should she shed crocodile tears and feign support for our military in order to cling onto some chance of assuming absolute power in 2004 and helping the terrorists destroy capitalism and freedom forever? It's a tough call. No wonder she's stressed out.
To: JohnHuang2
Hillary had the presidency in the palm of her hand in 2004. She was the constant center of attention. Now she is suddenly irrelevant.
17 posted on
09/27/2001 1:40:52 AM PDT by
RLK
To: JohnHuang2
bump
To: JohnHuang2
It's so simple.... Hillary! was the Queen. She's still ticked that it just isn't so any longer. She wants it back. All of it. And God help any body who gets in her way.
To: JohnHuang2
23 posted on
09/27/2001 1:57:10 AM PDT by
Kerensky
To: JohnHuang2
Well, Cartman ate Rosie once. Perhaps he's still hungry (We can only hope!)
To: JohnHuang2
The terrorists have rained on her parade.
25 posted on
09/27/2001 2:04:28 AM PDT by
exnavy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson