Posted on 09/25/2001 8:04:00 PM PDT by ppaul
Worth repeating. How much longer will taxpayers allow their money to be spent on the indoctrination of young people in ideologies fundamentally opposed to American principles?
I can envision a world at peace.
I can envision a world that doesn't even have the word "war" in its vocabulary.
I can envision a world without violence.
I can envision a world where all men live as brothers, working hand in hand for the common good.
I can envision a world that doesn't even contain ONE SINGLE WEAPON!
And I can envision someday, far in the future, the human race building great spaceships to fly across the universe and visit other galaxies and one day discovering this world.
And I can envision us attacking and conquering them! I mean, it would be so EASY, because, you know, like, they wouldn't be EXPECTING anything like this at all! Oh, man. That would be so sweet!
An eyes for free for the taking makes the whole world Dachau
Vaudine
Hear hear!
I guess the "nuke'em" threads have kinda disappeared. same with the "this is a war against all of islam" folks.
They did attack our shores with troops, what is it you don't get about that?
If they were dressed in Hugo Boss uniforms, would you feel better?
"...But the new self-proclaimed peaceniks are anti-American cultural warriors willing to sink to unimaginable moral equivalencies.
Whereas the old peace movement questioned America's right to kill people in other countries when no attack on American soil had occurred, the new peace movement defends the brutal killing of thousands of Americans on the grounds that America got what it had coming..."
We've been brutally attacked, on our own soil, by cowards that made a point of killing as many innocent people as possible. It seems that they had even greater carnage in mind. They've committed an act of war against us, a war they declared openly years ago, a war we've only begun to acknowlege.
There is no act of appeasement we can commit that will forestall further outrages against our citizens. It's not what we've done in the past that caused these psychos to hate us and want to kill us all, it's what we are: FREE. They can't and won't tolerate that. If we withdrew support for the Israelis, gave them all the money they could stand and kissed their rear ends on the world stage, they'd still hate us and kill us every chance they got. Because we're the greatest country on the planet, because we can tolerate differing opinions, allow a variety of religions. They believe in the Koran like I believe in the tooth fairy; they like killing people, and it's just that simple. Their perverted version of Islam is just an excuse for killing anyone who isn't just like them, and they're not going away just because we hold hands and sing peace songs. They must be killed or they'll kill us.
Do I want more innocent blood? No. But these cowards (and no words fits them better) will do the same thing the NVA and VC did, which is hide behind the skirts of their women and children to make us out to be "war criminals" if we strike back. There will be more innocent lives lost. There is simply no way to avoid that completely. The only question is: Ours, or theirs? To me, that's no contest at all. The life of any American is worth more to me than the lives of a hundred terrorists and their wives, kids, etc. If that makes me a heartless "war criminal", so be it. At least I'll be able to look myself in the face every morning. Those who scream that it's all our fault and that we mustn't do anything to make the terrorist even madder can look in the mirror, but they won't see anything.
Pretty clear that the CAL Berkeley crowd and various other University "thinkers" bent on attempting to ignore realitiy for the sake of inane theories- the heart of the derivation of the loony left in this nation- has an keen aptitude for delusion to the degree that the military leader of Afghanistan has announced that the Afghans are going to win a "holy war' with 300,000 of their own Afghani protesters.
The anti-war proffers in our country- who really can be more accurately described as people that are generally unwilling to lay down their life to protect innocent citizens and could care less that 6700 plus people were killed by violent means on 9-11-01, should be the first to volunteer for the Afghans on suicide missions- afterall, if your philosophy is that it doesn't matter that you are being attacked by violent means and you believe that you shouldn't take real measures to stop innocent people from further and certain pain and violence, then you might as well join the terror lunatics in their jihad- because - you have already made the decision, if you carry the loony left's anti-war baloney to its logical conclusion, that you would allow violence to reign for the sake of some inane principle of non-violence.
The loony left ultimately believes that you and I should allow a violent terrorist network to kill people and we should not protect ourselves using force- because the anti-war people are afterall- against use of force, which obviosly leads to an end- the jihad wins by violence. I never said the loony left wasn't short-sighted either.
Pretty stupid professers really. More precisely though- the anti-war basketcases' delusional principle is, in my view, wholly and completely selfish- these nuts literally believe that NOTHING, including the killing of you and me by lunatic terrorists, is worth 'fighting against'.
The anti-war deluded believe that their 'principle' in fact requires that you and I sacrifice our lives for the sake of their farcical philosophy- and that- dear friends is no different than what the crazies in Afghanistan ask their people to do- commit suicide.
So, I have a proposition for 'Obi-dull-brain', leader of the purported Afghan "military forces" (otherwise know as protesters) and the loony left. Have Obi strap a bomb to his loins and run into a crowd of war-protesters. The two philosphies will meet in perfect harmony for the sake of their delusional principles and the rest of us can observe these absolute mental cases reduce their numbers for the sake of an erroneous principle that does no more than 1). cause innocent people to be killed, and 2). cause more innocent people to be killed.
The anti-war philosophy is nothing more than a suicide mission based on incorrect presumptions of the way the world really operates by ignoring the reality that there exist people in the world who perpetrate proactive violence upon innocent victims. So, if you ignore that reality, it provides a selfish cave of excuses for those who feel their life is more important than taking community efforts to save the village, so to speak, from further death and pain.
The anti-war protester does nothing more than tell you that in the event of an attack upon the village, they'd be the first to run- out of pure selfishness, and as they ran, turn back to you and say, "now don't hit back, it's not right, but spare my right to tell you that and I'll be back when you're done saving my ass- hope you make it out alive. I'm outta here"
Pure unadulterated selfishness.
Nazis, plain and simple.
prambo
They've certainly heard of Bin Ladin. Talk to an immigrant from the area.
Additionally, it's not in a vacuum. The "government" is protecting him, and is no longer innocent.
Nope -- we intend to engage in violence against guilty human beings. The blood is on their hands, and theirs alone. If any innocents get caught in the crossfire, that too is entirely their fault: it was their choice to use the general population as human shields instead of surrendering or fighting honorably.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.