Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Unfree Republic
Lew Rockwell ^ | 9/24/01 | Jeff Elkins

Posted on 09/24/2001 3:10:00 AM PDT by Ada Coddington

Unfree Republic
by Jeff Elkins

Let the stench of Middle East flesh reach Paradise reassuring them that these filth have gone to hell permanently."

The quote above is representative of many posted on the FreeRepublic.com site in the wake of the WTC attack, and unfortunately its like is not uncommon elsewhere. Americans are angry, predictably and rightly so, but just as predictable are the side effects. As always, that righteous anger will be accepted as a beloved gift by the state and molded into tools of oppression.

It’s funny how that works. Every single state-sponsored war the US has become embroiled in has resulted in an inexorable increase in the power of the state.

It’s also funny that it’s always assumed that human behavior in the past has no relation to how we behave today. Why those people were old-fashioned, we’re modern, educated, etc.

The beginning of this repeating pattern has already become public with the establishment of the Department of Homeland Security. It has an ominous sound, that name, almost Germanic. (I can’t wait to see the uniforms.)

On April 13, 1917, days after our entry into World War One, President Wilson created the Committee on Public Information to promote the war domestically while publicizing American war aims abroad. Bush has replicated that step, with this new cabinet-level department.

Under the leadership of journalistic muckraker George Creel, the CPI was a propaganda apparatus unparalleled at that point in world history. The CPI functioned as a de facto public censor, vetting nearly all published material about the war and helping to draft legislation such as the Espionage Act of 1917 and the Sedition Act of 1918. In the months prior to our entry into the war and especially after our entry when they were nearly criminal, antiwar viewpoints were rarely heard.

The same pattern emerges now: Penn. Gov. Tom Ridge will be President Bush’s George Creel, and just as in those dim days of yesteryear, he’ll have plenty of willing civilian accomplices. And after all, there’s so much more to censor -- Ridge will need all the help he can get. In seeking warriors for the front line of Internet censorship, Ridge needs look no farther than FreeRepublic.com. The atmosphere there is now poisonous.

Again, look back to Wilson's CPI. It encouraged businesses to spy on their employees, parents to spy on their children, children to spy on their parents, neighbors to spy on neighbors, and above all to report "disloyal," pro-German sentiments. State authorities banned the teaching of German in schools and changed German street names. As the madness mounted, those regarded as pro-German were hounded from their jobs, pressured to change their German names, beaten, and in a few cases lynched. Almost all cases of violence, while incited by the state, were carried out by "civilians" in the grip of war hysteria.

Along with this anti-German hysteria, Congress passed several measures designed to rigidly suppress criticism of the war. In particular, the Espionage Act, passed in June 1917, specified a fine of $10,000 or twenty years in prison for "whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully obstruct the recruiting or enlistment service of the United States, and whoever, when the United States is at war, shall willfully utter, print, write, or publish any disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the form of government of the United States, or the military or naval forces of the United States, or the flag."

The Espionage Act was very popular in its day. It was cheered on by mindless lemmings under the influence of state propaganda. Their great grandchildren now inhabit FreeRepublic.com, viciously attacking anyone who questions the wisdom of the state.

Our Congress is considering similar measures under the rubric of "anti-terrorism," and as it was at the beginning of the 20th Century, the FreeRepublic lemmings of the 21st are cheering the morally corrupt politicians along.

It’s not just message posters on the site. The management of FreeRepublic has instituted a "loose lips sink ships" campaign, with new moderators patrolling the forum to delete posts that in their opinion are detrimental to the "war effort."

The FreeRepublic mission statement claims "We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America."

Sanctimonious hogwash. Everything old is new again – the keyboard warriors of FreeRepublic would be right at home in 1917 shilling for Wilson.

September 24, 2001

Jeff Elkins is a freelance consultant and writer living in North Central Florida. His personal website is located at www.elkins.org.


TOPICS: Editorial; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-503 next last
To: Abundy
The libertarians remind me of those who tried to persuade us not to go to war against nazi germany. They were wrong then, and they're wrong now.
61 posted on 09/24/2001 5:04:03 AM PDT by Robert-J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Robert-J, Inspector Harry Callahan, Jim Robinson, thread
We survived the War Between the States and kept our constitutional republic.

Some might disagree with you on this point - especially since Mr. Lincoln suspended habeus corpus and arrested judges, legislators and others to help his war effort. Did the Constitution and the Republic associated with it truly survive?

You might want to try to ally the fears of those of us who are distrustful of government power with another example, dontcha think?

I'm going to work, hopefully I won't disappear and will be able to return to read the anticipated flames...

62 posted on 09/24/2001 5:04:10 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
We are at war and like the man said, you are either with US or with them. Which will it be?
He said that in the context of countries, not the people of this country.
By extending it to American dissenters, you are proving Jeff's point.
63 posted on 09/24/2001 5:04:58 AM PDT by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: DB
Britain is a very different place.

It is different because they are subjects, not citizens.

I thought FR was populated by individuals who understood that. I'm beginning to wonder.

64 posted on 09/24/2001 5:05:05 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
"The woman may speak ... but none of you may listen."

The Alcalde (from "Zorro, the Gay Blade")

65 posted on 09/24/2001 5:07:54 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Robert-J
I'm not a libertarian. Although if to remain a conservative I have to go along with destroying the constitution like a democrat then I'll be changing my designation...
66 posted on 09/24/2001 5:08:19 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
We are. But we're not nearly half as paranoid as you are. Foil anyone?
67 posted on 09/24/2001 5:08:34 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
How right he is. I've been on FR for 1 1/2 years. I've certainly learned a lot reading the words of some very eloquent FReepers, especially during the election snafu last year. There are some very intelligent Freepers out there.

However, this site has become increasingly worse. Since the 9/11 event, members of this forum have become rabid and even dangerous. Some, by posting the address and phone number of a writer whose opinion was not welcome on FR, and then "hoping" that he didnt get hurt. He spoke of peace and a change in govt policy.

I know not all Freepers are like this, but if anyone speaks of peace or changes in US Govt interventionist policies, most members pepper and insult the poster rather than opposing the argument with reasonable logic. This is absurd.

What has happened? During the election crisis, Freepers wanted the truth. They knew the facts. Now it seems everyone wants more bloodshed and war not knowing all the facts even if the facts point to our govt as part of the cause.

I know folks out there are angry. I am too.

Maybe it's time that some of you all out there work towards getting FRs reputation out of the mud. I know of other FReepers out there who have lost interest in FR because of the general "attack" mood. If one didnt know any better, one might confuse this site with some fascist website. I could see a site like this being run by Germans in the 1930's had the internet been available then. Maybe the website name should be changed to FreeDemocracy since the majority opinion is always dictating what's best and right. The individual opinion is suspect.

I'm sure these comments will bring more peppering and personal insults. It's expected here in FR now days.

Some of you should take a look at what you are saying and how you are reacting. It certainly doesnt sound like a liberty loving group sometimes. Thank God some of you arent running this country.

68 posted on 09/24/2001 5:09:04 AM PDT by GeorgeF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
Good point.
69 posted on 09/24/2001 5:09:08 AM PDT by Abundy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Abundy
I don't see us on track for disappearing people here. I believe Bush and Ashcroft (sp?) are honorable people and won't disappear people here. So far Bush has been very measured. Proof is ultimately in the pudding… The only connection between Bush and a national ID card so far is Drudge. That's pretty weak…

If Bush does do the things you worry about, I too will be very unhappy. Let's give him the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

70 posted on 09/24/2001 5:10:27 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeF
Now it seems everyone wants more bloodshed and war not knowing all the facts even if the facts point to our govt as part of the cause.

And a justifiable flame you shall receive. The government, for all my complaints in life about them, did not fly the planes. Did not recruit the hijackers. Did not kill innocent men, women and children in the United States on 9-11-01. It's these kind of statements that are made on LIBERAL and leftist boards that get the libertarians flamed here. If you're growing thin skin here now, then you are at fault, not the rest of us. And blaming the government beyond a failure of law enforcement is no way contributing to the conversation. It's taking the Clinton approach of finding someone at fault OTHER than the parties responsible. And the causes of this attack are nothing more than political gain by parties in the Middle East. Not religion. Not hate. Pure simple politics.
71 posted on 09/24/2001 5:14:00 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
The only people I have heard call for all out bombing Og Afghanistan are the leftists, they see things like "I can't wait until Bush starts Bombing innocent civialians then we will be able to attack the heart of American Power." Now that they see our Country knows the proper restraint they are trying to intiate an all out bombing by attacking the Patriots.
72 posted on 09/24/2001 5:15:02 AM PDT by Fearless Flyers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeF
You compare us the fascists and then you expect a civil response...

I will also point out that by some miracle you managed to express your opinion and survive it...

Give peace a chance right? What peace did you offer in your comments?

73 posted on 09/24/2001 5:16:40 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeF
I would strongly recommend studying Neville Chamberlain of Great Britain and how WWII came into being. I think you fundamentally misunderstand what is going on now if you think the September 11th attack is mainly related to our foreign policy. It is not.
74 posted on 09/24/2001 5:24:22 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: DB
Oops... "compare us to fascists"...
75 posted on 09/24/2001 5:25:56 AM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: BurkeanCyclist
Lew is a Southern conservative, just as Michael Pierce is. LRC is as much a site for conservative opinion as for libertarian opinion. I think you're just ticked at some of the LRC writers for having the gall to suggest that republican politicians are socialists like democrat politicians are.

BTW, the "lewrockwell.commies" are limited to the few communist columnists whose columns are posted on LRC once in a while to show the absurdity of their thinking, such as Alexander Cockburn, and your pal, "former communist", David Horowitz.

Neocons crack me up. Seeing you boys try to articulate conservative positions is like listening to a Frenchman trying to pronounce 'ciciri".

76 posted on 09/24/2001 5:26:50 AM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
...living in North Central Florida...

For a moment, I thought this fellow had some credentials.

77 posted on 09/24/2001 5:30:40 AM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Twodees
Neocons crack me up. Seeing you boys try to articulate conservative positions is like listening to a Frenchman trying to pronounce 'ciciri".

No disagreement with that statement. However some of the folly coming from the libertarian party, of which I used to be a member is just plain old tin foil fodder. The paranoia is unbelieveable. Next thing you know Agent Mulder will be sleeping under their beds.
78 posted on 09/24/2001 5:30:54 AM PDT by Nuke'm Glowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Inspector Harry Callahan
Uh-oh. Demidog was banned? I kinda leaned strongly in the same direction. Was there something in particular?
79 posted on 09/24/2001 5:35:42 AM PDT by Osinski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ada Coddington
This looks like a safe thread for me to slip in this link, for all of the patriots who are wondering what us (ahem) traitors are concerned about...

President Bush's ANTI-TERRORISM ACT OF 2001 -- Section-by-Section Analysis


80 posted on 09/24/2001 5:37:00 AM PDT by Sandy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 501-503 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson