Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Measures May Incite Domestic Terror (militia)
Stratfor.com ^ | Sept. 21, 2001 | Stratfor.com

Posted on 09/21/2001 5:03:49 PM PDT by testforecho

U.S. Measures May Incite Domestic Terror
2300 GMT, 010921

Summary

In the wake of terrorist attacks on New York and Washington, the U.S. government is moving quickly to create a new Cabinet-level agency for homeland defense and ease restrictions on law enforcement agencies. But while these measures may prove effective against foreign attacks, they may also lead to increased domestic terrorism.

Analysis

In a televised State of the Union address Sept. 20, U.S. President George W. Bush announced the creation of a new Cabinet-level agency designed to "lead, oversee and coordinate" a national strategy to guard the United States against terrorism. Congress meanwhile is considering new laws to ease restrictions on wiretapping and eavesdropping.

These new measures may be necessary components to protect the United States from further attacks by foreign terrorists. But they will also likely fuel the fears and anger of domestic groups such as the Michigan Militia or the North American Volunteer Militia. In time, as the U.S. security apparatus looks for threats coming from outside the country, the United States may again face attacks from within.

More than 800 militia-style groups existed at the peak of the anti-government movement in the mid-1990s, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center. The number has decreased dramatically in the past five years, thanks to a combination of a strong economy and heavy pressure from law enforcement agencies in the wake of the Oklahoma City bombing. The SPLC now identifies only 194 "Patriot" groups that were active in 2000.

Generally Patriot groups define themselves as opposed to the "New World Order" or advocate extreme anti-government doctrines, fearing the growth of government bureaucracies and intrusion upon civil liberties. Such groups are likely to enjoy a resurgence in interest, membership and activities as the government adopts more stringent security measures.

U.S. lawmakers historically have been very cautious about tipping the balance between law enforcement and civil liberties. It took Congress nearly a year to pass former U.S. President Bill Clinton's anti-terrorism bill after the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa. In the weeks before the recent terror attacks, privacy advocates hailed a major victory when a San Diego judge banned the use of automatic cameras to catch cars driving through red lights.

But the attacks in New York and Washington have dramatically altered much of the nation's thinking, as many Americans are beginning to place a greater value on security. This shift is reflected in the federal government.

The newly announced Office of Homeland Security, to be headed by Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, is aimed at knitting together counter terrorism functions now scattered across more than 40 federal agencies, including the FBI, CIA, National Guard and local police and firefighting forces. It will focus not only on preventing terrorist attacks but also on fortifying potential targets by developing plans to protect the nation's transportation, power and food systems, according to officials cited by the Associated Press.

The "Mobilization Against Terrorism Act" still under consideration in Congress would rewrite laws dealing with wiretapping, eavesdropping and immigration. Included in the bill are provisions to ease the restrictions the FBI faces on installing its Carnivore Internet-surveillance system as well as streamlining procedures to obtaining voicemail recordings.

Further provisions include eliminating the statue of limitations for terrorism-related crimes and allowing federal authorities to detain without a court order non-U.S. citizens suspected of involvement in terrorist activities. Also under consideration is a modification to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to make it easier for prosecutors in certain highly sensitive cases to look through the records of a business, credit card company or Internet provider.

Fewer restrictions on law enforcement agents and the creation of a new federal office may be necessary steps to protect the United States from foreign terrorists. But powerful bureaucracies and narrowed civil liberties are exactly the sort of triggers that set off militia groups.

We are likely to see a resurgence of militia group activity just at the time that law enforcement agencies are retasking themselves to counter foreign threats. Even if law enforcement agents continue to infiltrate militia groups, it is much more difficult to monitor and prevent activity from individuals. As militia ranks fill, it is not unlikely to expect some of them to resort to the same kind of armed activity as Timothy McVeigh and Ted Kaczynski did in the past.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Cicero
As long as the Homeland Defense people and the security agencies leave ordinary, law-abiding citizens alone, and don't start pretending that people praying on the sidewalks in front of abortion clinics are "terrorists," there won't be any trouble.

It sounds like Stratfor/SPLC are hinting how the new agency should proceed. Ignore the terrorists that have oozed into the country all these years. It's the overweight white guys with their too-obedient wives, and kids, at the weekend target-shoot/cookout that are America's true enemy.

Mesage from Stratfor to Homeland Defense: be sure to ignore all them weird folks at Elohim City, just like all the other feds did, too.

21 posted on 09/21/2001 6:19:55 PM PDT by 300winmag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
There is alot logic disconnect with this article. So much BS.
22 posted on 09/21/2001 6:24:52 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: demlosers
Let's call it what it is.
Yet more slander and libel of your average low and middle class WHITE GUYS.
Guess you gotta wear a turban and smell like sheep to get any respect in this country.
23 posted on 09/21/2001 6:32:46 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
There is some real horse manure in this piece -- Such as listening to those Southern Law Center Schmucks -- but the point is the real deal.

Indeed, the sickest ironies, the most insidious evils that have come, and will continue to come, from the raghead attacks on U.S.A. is that:

a) more people will now die at the hand of federal alphabet soup terrorists such as the DEA, FBI and BATF and
b) possibly more people will die in attacks from those prepared to give their life for the Constitution and Bill of Rights.

Solving the threat of attack from domestic sources is QED -- Quite Easily Done -- Return to the Rule of Law under the Constitution and Bill of Rights. Presto. No more threat from Billy Joe and Ida Mae out in Stickville.

Of course, then we'd have even more threat from the Gore/Nader voter types that so like to burn ski lodges and smash out windows at starbucks.....

Oh well. Such is life in a lawless land with dumbed down soccer moms that lead the political winds even whilst they look for little Johnny's ritalin and the next Klinton to fellate.

24 posted on 09/21/2001 6:34:41 PM PDT by James Mabry (libertyone@hotmail.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: James Mabry
Tell us how you really feel!!

;-)
25 posted on 09/21/2001 6:40:26 PM PDT by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
Fewer restrictions on law enforcement agents and the creation of a new federal office may be necessary steps to protect the United States from foreign terrorists. But powerful bureaucracies and narrowed civil liberties are exactly the sort of triggers that set off militia groups.

They got that right. And it should get all freedom loving patriots steamed.

We are likely to see a resurgence of militia group activity just at the time that law enforcement agencies are retasking themselves to counter foreign threats. Even if law enforcement agents continue to infiltrate militia groups, it is much more difficult to monitor and prevent activity from individuals. As militia ranks fill, it is not unlikely to expect some of them to resort to the same kind of armed activity as Timothy McVeigh and Ted Kaczynski did in the past.

I am not familiar with this website, but they seem to take the typical liberal media bias of trotting out the specters of McVeigh, who was expelled from the Militia group he was associated with, and Kaczynski who was never was a Militia member and was in fact an Eco-terrorist (a person totally opposed to personal freedom).

26 posted on 09/21/2001 6:42:47 PM PDT by Pontiac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
I have come to the conclusion that stratfor.com is a leftist disinformation propaganda machine. It might be interesting to find out who all these "analysts" are. I think these are the people who put out half-truths and rumors designed to elicit a particular reaction. We need to look at actual proposed legislation to see if these characters aren't spinning.
27 posted on 09/21/2001 6:50:59 PM PDT by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SentryoverAmerica
With the direction the world is headed, we must have strong militias in all the states of the union.

All states do have militias. The members just have to wake up and realize that they are.

Government officials are sufficiency aware of the basic maxim of rule: people can exist without a government but a government can't exist without people. They can't overcome it but they can block it by keeping people divided among themselves.

A people divided really have no militia.

28 posted on 09/21/2001 6:56:09 PM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: spartan68
"If someone is so fearful that they are going to start using their weapons to protect their rights, it makes me very nervous that these people have weapons at all." ~~California Representative Henry Waxman

That is a superb quote. Any chance of getting a source where Waxman was quoted as saying it?

29 posted on 09/21/2001 6:59:32 PM PDT by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: testforecho, Hugh Akston
THIS is the Domestic Terror STRATFOR should REALLY be watching out for.

Lists and Information on Anti-war Protests (MEGA-BARF) -REPOST

30 posted on 09/21/2001 7:11:49 PM PDT by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #31 Removed by Moderator

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

Comment #33 Removed by Moderator

To: testforecho
The original Homeland Defense = The Second Amendment and armed citizens.
34 posted on 09/21/2001 7:26:18 PM PDT by WalterSkinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: testforecho
Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought slack CIA/FBI intelligence of foreign nationals in this country, and terroristic enforment of usurped "laws" by the FBI/ATF against citizens of this country, to be, at least, partly responsible for the more recent domestic terrorism. I would suggest the FBI/ATF/CIA secret police spend more time watching foreign nationals entering our nation and less time watching the natural born citizens of our nation. You might also consider enforcing the laws made pursuant to the Constitution of the United States, rather than the zillion or so "laws" created via usurpation. That will destroy the so-called militia movement instantly without a shot being fired, and will demonstrate that you, the enforcers, are also good citizens (just as instantly). While you are at it, expel all who currently hold visa's (and those in our nation illegally), and tell them to resubmit applications for visas. That will give us a fresh start on the true war on terrorism.

God Bless America

35 posted on 09/21/2001 7:32:34 PM PDT by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imberedux
ZOG is a term used by anti-Semites. It means "Zionist Occupation Government."
36 posted on 09/21/2001 7:32:37 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

Comment #37 Removed by Moderator

To: meenie
Stratfor is usually a pretty good source for international issues but they sure missed the landing pad on this one.

This is the second of those in a week. It reminds me of Science News, which in the space of a few weeks went from being a really neat little magazine that covered breaking news in every branch of science, to a screaming environmental junk-science rag. It's as if Gramsci's Legions have arrived to assimilate yet another institution and turn it into a mouthpiece for the Left.


38 posted on 09/21/2001 7:40:31 PM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #39 Removed by Moderator

To: testforecho
Militia does not equal domestic terrorists. My line of thinking is we're gonna find out this will be a real good time to have the militias around.
40 posted on 09/21/2001 7:45:04 PM PDT by c. l. coffman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson