Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Steyn: The Queen’s Tears
National Review ^ | 09/17/2001 | Mark Steyn

Posted on 09/17/2001 10:03:30 AM PDT by Pokey78

The foreign leader who said it best last week was the Queen, though she didn't really say a word. I have met Her Majesty from time to time (I am one of her Canadian subjects), and to put it at its mildest, for those with a taste for American vernacular politics, she can be a little stiff: The Queen stands on ceremony and she has a lot of ceremony to stand on. But on Thursday, for the Changing of the Guard at Buckingham Palace, she ordered the Coldstream Guards to play "The Star-Spangled Banner" — the first time a foreign anthem had been played at the ceremony. The following day something even more unprecedented happened: At Britain's memorial service for the war dead of last Tuesday, the first chords of "The Star-Spangled Banner" rumbled up from the great organ at St Paul's Cathedral, and the Queen did something she's never done before — she sang a foreign national anthem, all the words. She doesn't sing her own obviously ("God Save Me"), but she's never sung "La Marseillaise" or anything else, either; her lips never move.

And at that same service she also sang "The Battle Hymn Of The Republic," for the second time in her life — the first was at the funeral of her first prime minister, Winston Churchill. On Friday, she fought back tears. When she ascended the throne, Harry Truman was in the White House. The first president she got to know was Eisenhower, back in the war, when he'd come to the palace to brief her father. She is the head of state of most of the rest of the English-speaking world — Queen of Britain, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Bahamas, Belize, Papua New Guinea, Tuvalu, etc. But she understands something that few other leaders of the West seem to — that today the ultimate guarantor of the peace and liberty of her realms is the United States. If America falls, or is diminished, or retreats in on itself, there is no "free world." That's the meaning of the Queen's "Ich bin ein Amerikaaner" moment.

Don't ask me who else you can count on. The NATO declaration was impressive, but, even as the press release was coming off the photocopier, a big chunk of America's 18 allies were backsliding. Norway, Germany, and Italy said they had no intention of contributing planes, ships, or men. Even as purely political support, the invocation of Article Five was written in disappearing ink. The Italian foreign minister — speaking for Europe's most conservative government — said "the term 'war' is inappropriate." "We are not at war," said Belgian Foreign Minister Louis Michel, his nation's signature on that NATO document notwithstanding. Belgium holds the current presidency of the EU and was last seen apologizing for slavery, colonialism, etc at Durban's recent U.N. Conference Against Whitey, Hymie, and Capitalism.

The Royal Air Force will be alongside the USAF. The Aussies will send something. The Canadians will manage a token rustbucket like HMCS Toronto, the ship we dispatched the last time things started heating up in the gulf. And New Zealand's recalcitrant prime minister may yet be forced by popular opinion into showing a bit more muscle. The British, whatever their other faults, have no fear of body bags and a tabloid press that loves a good war. Polls show 75% support for British participation in military action. If these are the only active participants, so be it: In a war about values, responsible government, the rule of law and individual liberty are essentially concepts of the English-speaking world that the rest of the West has only belatedly caught up to. Just a quarter-century ago, for example, most of southern Europe — Portugal, Spain, Greece — was run by dictators. These people are used to making their accommodations with history. That's why the danger in Colin Powell's "broad coalition" approach is that it will have the same effect as it had a decade ago — acting as a brake on American purpose.

But more dangerous than open anti-Americanism abroad is the more slippery variety at home. In New Hampshire on Friday, the Union-Leader had a splendid picture special of patriotic Granite Staters — Dawn Dupont of Pembroke holding her "Beep To Bomb Bin Laden" sign on Route 3, the "Live Free Or Die Against Terrorism" banner in Concord. But at the biggest daily paper in western New Hampshire attention was already wandering: While British, French, Canadian, German and Irish front pages were all devoted wholly to the aftermath of the massacres, the Valley News thought it was time to, in the Clintonian sense, "move on" and managed to find room on page one for an inconsequential story about one school district's high-school building options. The letters page had three long missives — one arguing that the Second Amendment gives no individual right to bear arms, one about gays and the Boy Scouts, and one on Tuesday's events by Robert Daubenspeck of White River Junction, Vermont, who advised against retaliation. "Someone, someday, must have the courage not to hit back but to look them in the eye and say, 'I love you.'" It would be mean-spirited to regret that Mr. Daubenspeck was not given the opportunity to test his thesis with one of the hijackers on American Airlines Flight 11. But the dreadful inert Valley News is enough to make me pine for Le Monde.

A couple of other examples: My friend's 16-year-old daughter came home with Tuesday's events put into context by her high-school history teacher, who wanted every pupil to remember that the Allies killed far more civilians when they bombed Dresden. On Sunday, I went to my local Baptist Church, where the interim pastor gave the most inadequate sermon I have ever heard. Her main point was that "even here in New Hampshire" those who look different from us "are facing threats to their lives." In a population of a quarter-billion, maybe two or three dozen have done something dumb — driven their pick-up to the parking lot of a mosque and shouted something rude, smashed a window of an Arab-American business, shouted "Screw you, towelhead." The other 99.99999% have done nothing. Yet my pastor's principal concern was the ugliness of Americans.

Against that should be set the example of the local volunteer fire department, who hosted a town get-together on Sunday afternoon and offered up prayers that, compared to those of our trained professional preacher, were straightforward, inspiring, and spoke of God's will and our obligation to resist evil. But, to be honest, I'm a little rattled: For every high-flying flag, there's someone who wants to make this "tragedy" and "crisis" into the usual masturbatory grief wallow of empty Clintobabble — "healing," "closure," and all the other guff. This stuff is far craftier than old-style pacifism or open anti-Americanism, and after a decade of self-indulgence it reaches deep into the American psyche. Its grip on churches and schools is particularly grim: Every part of the country has an example — the vice-provost at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Penn., who banned American flags "so non-Americans students would not feel uncomfortable"; the Boca Raton company and Texas grade-school that did the same thing for the same reason. This is what brought us to Tuesday morning: the western world's 30-year campaign of self-denigration, culminating in its ludicrous determination to apologize for Western Civilization to the massed ranks of gangsters and dictators (supported as always by the Rev. Jesse Jackson, President-for-Life of the Republic of Himself) at Durban, a week before the massacres. This is the start of a long war, with civilians in the front line. We will never win it if we are ashamed of ourselves, our culture, our history.

That's why I thank the queen, a non-American but, pace the vice-provost of Lehigh University, not one who's uncomfortable with the emblems of the great republic that overthrew her forebear. And so at St. Paul's — symbol of British resistance during the Blitz — she sang the words written by Francis Scott Key in 1814 on the last occasion the Eastern Seaboard came under sustained bombardment — by the ships of the Royal Navy. Her Majesty gets it. I wish, back in America, my pastor, the high-school teachers, school boards, and vice-provosts did.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: ignatz_q
But, to be honest, I'm a little rattled: For every high-flying flag, there's someone who wants to make this "tragedy" and "crisis" into the usual masturbatory grief wallow of empty Clintobabble — "healing," "closure," and all the other guff.

I'm a little rattled too. Truth be told, after we wipe our eyes from moving scenes like those described here, we need to maintain a level of steely eyed anger, no, rage, and encourage our leaders to reflect that rage in tangible, earth shaking ways.

Folks, the left reflexivly blames America. They've been silenced by the enormity of the damage inflicted in NYC, but they will regain their voices, soon. If they haven't already. We need to maintain our current posture of readiness to support sustained, military action against these monsters. And we must make sure that the voices of appeasement and self-hatred are denounced and exposed.

That said, God save the Queen.

21 posted on 09/17/2001 11:42:04 AM PDT by borkrules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Samizdat
Yesterday PM in Vancouver the Canucks had an inter-squad game at GM Place.

13,000 fans attended, the usual wild mixture of ethnicities that one finds in big Canadian cities.

Prior to the game,a minute of silence was observed and the "Star-Spangled Banner" was sung.

Thousands of Canadians with emotion-choked voices, struggled through your proud national Song.

While the singing was unsteady, there was not a sour or false note in the respect people paid to America and her heroic people.

Over $130,000 was raised by the Red Cross for aid to NYC.

People in Canada are not stupid; we know which side we're on.

God Bless America!

Still a proud Canadian.

22 posted on 09/17/2001 11:45:09 AM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
I love Canada and I love the US OF A TOO. GOD SAVE THE QUEEN! AND GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!
23 posted on 09/17/2001 3:26:34 PM PDT by MARETHLINE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: MARETHLINE
BTTT!
24 posted on 09/17/2001 4:37:36 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78,kayak,lepton
Thanks for this post,Pokey.

kayak,lepton - I believe paragraph 7 contains the definitive clarification of the "pity party" comment. Oh, to be able to write like that!

25 posted on 09/17/2001 4:54:31 PM PDT by pollyshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: rebdov
You are a real man. A man who would not cry in the face of such human carnage is a beast, a hulk of protoplasm. We all need a good national cry, and then Geronimo.

Extremely well said - applause applause applause!!

27 posted on 09/17/2001 5:25:34 PM PDT by WIladyconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mad Ivan
A salute to our one true Ally.

God save the Queen and God bless the Brits.

28 posted on 09/17/2001 5:36:06 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
D*mn computer. Can't tell Mad Ivan from MadIvan.

Post 28 is for you.

29 posted on 09/17/2001 5:39:56 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
And at that same service she also sang "The Battle Hymn Of The Republic," for the second time in her life — the first was at the funeral of her first prime minister, Winston Churchill. On Friday, she fought back tears.

I have always loved The Battle Hymn of the Republic, find it difficult not to cry when singing or hearing it, and after it was sung at the National Cathedral on Friday, I checked out its history. Julia Ward Howe wrote it in 1861 as she watched Union soldiers march off to fight in the War between the States. (She was an ardent abolitionist.) The melody was a "United States campmeeting" tune of that time. The fifth stanza lacks attribution, but Howe wrote the first four. I wish someone would have pointed these facts out to me when I was a child.

30 posted on 09/17/2001 5:46:25 PM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
But she [QE2] understands something that few other leaders of the West seem to — that today the ultimate guarantor of the peace and liberty of her realms is the United States. If America falls, or is diminished, or retreats in on itself, there is no "free world."
31 posted on 09/17/2001 5:48:38 PM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The Queen stands on ceremony and she has a lot of ceremony to stand on.

Anyone who likes Corgis and horses must be basically OK with me.
QEII, considered yourself invited to drop by my place anytime for some humble American fare.
But I'll apologize in advance for not having a color guard available for the occassion.
32 posted on 09/17/2001 5:51:13 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"We are not at war," said Belgian Foreign Minister Louis Michel, his nation's signature on that NATO document notwithstanding.

Words cannot express how furiously angry I am at Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Norway. Let's destroy all but one of bin Laden's suicide bombers, and then let him take his pick of highly populated Belgian, French, German, Italian or Norwegian landmarks into which to fly a fully-fueled plane.

33 posted on 09/17/2001 5:56:28 PM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aric2000
I am not a man who cries easily, I NEVER cry, but last week,
I cried more then I ever have in my entire life.


Hopefully, someday I will have your level of ego-strength.
Until then, I'll simply deny any rumors circulating that I was doing the same thing.
And getting some weird chills hearing the Cold Stream Guards and Old St. Paul's
yielding the tones of our national anthem.
34 posted on 09/17/2001 5:56:54 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Words cannot express how furiously angry I am at Belgium, France, Germany, Italy and Norway.

Given the conduct of England during WWI, WWII, and as our ally in other conflicts,
all I can say is that when "Archie Bunker" said that "England's an f@g country",
he was simply mistaken about which side of the Channel he was referring to.
35 posted on 09/17/2001 5:59:46 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Favorite columnist bump.

This really puts in perspective the struggle we are facing. It is good against evil in the sense that every effort will be made to undermine those who seek justice for this despicable act. We are capable, I believe, of going this alone, but I'm also glad to have the British on our side.

36 posted on 09/17/2001 6:02:55 PM PDT by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: pollyshy, lepton
Yes, he did word that rather well, didn't he? ..... LOL! He truly "hits the Mark!"
37 posted on 09/17/2001 6:07:35 PM PDT by kayak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JMJ333,Turret Gunner A20,ken5050,ignatz_q,pokey78
 We are capable, I believe, of going this alone,
but I'm also glad to have the British on our side.

And the Israelis.  If anybody knows where the
bodies are buried, they do, having buried a
few of them themselves.

As for  the suddenly patriotic Muslims residing
in the USA, let's see how quickly they line
up at the doors of the CIA as volunteers to
infiltrate and bring down the terrorist network.
Can you say, "Cold front moves into Hell?"

38 posted on 09/17/2001 6:21:29 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Ethrane
Except for the past 8 years (of WJC), it was always hard to credibly impugn our motives in matters of world affairs. We believe in freedom and representative government, laws and individual rights.

It's been rather amazing watching the liberals on television condemn the U.S. for Clinton's actions (But of course only a rare few will specify that it was him).

39 posted on 09/17/2001 6:24:38 PM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I just started law school a few weeks ago. Many of the cases we've been reading are British, rather than American. Many of the precedents in our nation's judicial system were taken directly from courts in London, Newcastle, and York. Like it or not, Britain is the foundation of what we started here in America. For that reason, we must always see to it that our relationship is the tightest between any two nations on earth. God save the Queen, and God bless our President.
40 posted on 09/17/2001 6:28:48 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson