Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEDS RELEASED 3 PLOTTERS IN JUNE
New York Post ^ | 9/16/01 | AL GUART

Posted on 09/16/2001 12:38:13 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:00:45 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Three suspects in the bloodiest terrorist attack in U.S. history were in federal custody in New York three months ago - and set free, The Post has learned.

The three were taken into custody last June after Federal Protective Service cops spotted them brazenly snapping reconnaissance photos of 26 Federal Plaza, federal law-enforcement and military-intelligence sources said.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: HAL9000
Thanks, HAL.
21 posted on 09/16/2001 1:51:20 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Don't be posting these articles that are critical of our govenrnment. Don't you know that there is no blame to be placed at them during this critical time of war? Our first concern is to nuke the crap out of every country in the middle east except for Israel. Just shut up about this. Keep it hush hush. "Loose lips sink ships" (of state) don't you know.
22 posted on 09/16/2001 1:56:07 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tessalu
Islamic world population is now at about 1/5 and Christian is about 1/3.

We're in the minority. Let's make sure we expand the government's power to crack down on religions they don't approve of. That won't backfire or anything.

23 posted on 09/16/2001 1:57:45 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
This example should be RUBBED in the faces of PC liberals at every chance!

Were the FBI agents liberals?

24 posted on 09/16/2001 1:59:38 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
It could very easily be left in place to serve as a home base for large numbers of military and/or police helicopters. All they would have to do is clear the deck of all those planes that are now part of the "museum."
25 posted on 09/16/2001 2:14:51 AM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The civil liberties of all American citizens should be jealously guarded. These individuals, however, were not citizens. I am not an attorney, but I would think that unless treaty obligations specified that they were to be afforded privileges commensurate with American citizen's rights, then the federales should have every right to hold them to a higher standard of scrutiny.
26 posted on 09/16/2001 2:16:32 AM PDT by marsh2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
HHHmmmm... makes sense. Could also serve as a helo base and a hospital ship too I suppose.
27 posted on 09/16/2001 2:17:35 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
The Feds were afraid of being accused of racial profiling so they let them go. My take on this.
28 posted on 09/16/2001 2:46:50 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
If the US really insists in invading Afghanistan then the WTC / Pentagon bombings are the ultimate step in the most horrible conspiracy ever in History
29 posted on 09/16/2001 3:15:57 AM PDT by Milosevic2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
You posted the original Post article back in July, but I don't have it bookmarked. I saw you link it yesterday somewhere. Do you mind posting it here again?
30 posted on 09/16/2001 3:18:29 AM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
LOL! Never mind!
31 posted on 09/16/2001 3:21:13 AM PDT by Nita Nupress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #32 Removed by Moderator

To: Demidog
Were the FBI agents liberals?

Probably not (as I'm sure you're intimating), but that won't stop lackadaisical government agents from using a phony excuse like "we can't profile anyone, even suspicious acting aliens from the Middle East".

As you know, The FBI and the other feds can profile anyone anytime they want and get away with it. They have a whole unit devoted to criminal profiling and the courts have consistently backed up the power of the feds to use it liberally. I've been subjected to extra scrutiny almost every time I go through the airport metal detectors since I grew a beard.

It's only the New York cops who can't use the black skin of American citizens as a profiling criteria because some of them have developed a bad habit of shooting first and asking questions later. As you know, the feds can use any excuse they want to detain people and run them through all of those computers that we spend hundreds of billions of dollars on each year. Of course, unless they think they're dealing drugs or evading taxes they don't usually take the time to do so.

It looks like once again the pet program socialists will blame each other's pet programs for big government bungling and bloated bureaucratic business as usual will continue to be a steadily growing industry.

33 posted on 09/16/2001 4:03:22 AM PDT by ravinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
Civil rights? So they were American citizens? Or do you attained U.S. civil rights just by being a visitor?
34 posted on 09/16/2001 4:05:35 AM PDT by not-an-ostrich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kattracks, OKCsubmariner, golitely, honway, rdavis84, Wallaby
Three grainy intelligence photos of the men were attached to the memo, with the name of one suspect, Mohamed Hassan Abbadi, scrawled under what appeared to be a passport picture.

Mohamed Hassan Abbadi. does this name turn up anywhere?

35 posted on 09/16/2001 4:51:35 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbeatty
I wish they had detained them further in light of what happened, but I don't see how they could have.

You'd think that our agents would have kept the folks under surveillance until the film was developed, so that they could be picked up again and questioned. I agree that we were fortunate that somebody sensed that they were taking pictures for something other than tourist purposes, but the lack of follow-through is disgraceful.

36 posted on 09/16/2001 4:58:05 AM PDT by CompassionateLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
All cause FBI pantsywaists decided terrorists rights were more important than the lives of the people they subsequently murdered.
if you believe that, you might want to reconsider. i suspect that's their fall guy story. they could've handled it properly while still respecting civil liberties. they just want to blame 'policy' for their incompetence. once the country has grieved enough, i hope more people start asking the necessary question of our 'intelligence' community, law enforcement, and the military. i believe they all screwed the pooch on this one.
37 posted on 09/16/2001 5:04:36 AM PDT by AntiTyrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
This example should be RUBBED in the faces of PC liberals at every chance!
to a point, but it's a little too perfect a scapegoat in this case. if it was worth confiscating their film (already risking a suit), it was worth holding them for the 2 hours it would take to develop. please don't allow them to fluff off their mistake as if it's somebody else's fault.
38 posted on 09/16/2001 5:07:51 AM PDT by AntiTyrant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: GhostSoldier
Not a damn one of 'em is worth a crap.

For years the abjectly-politicized and consequently effectively-thoroughly-Evil feral-gummint police forces have been too damned busy covering up for their in-house murderers and other criminals -- and harrassing, disarming and killing innocent Americans in their homes and churches -- to be ever effectively "on-the-job."

39 posted on 09/16/2001 5:16:57 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
As you point out, the fed doesn't seem to have a problem stepping on the civil rights of American citizens on a regular basis.
If they had been part of a militia, or had bought a couple rifles in the last year, or were fundamental Christians, they would have automatically been given the big hairy eyeball.
Why these guys were given a pass is beyond me.
(Maybe the fact that it wasn't an obvious drug bust made it too much work to bother with...)
40 posted on 09/16/2001 6:15:52 AM PDT by freefly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson