Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They can't see why they are hated
The Guardian ^ | Thursday September 13, 2001 | Seumas Milne

Posted on 09/13/2001 6:33:57 AM PDT by getoffmylawn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-379 next last
To: LadyJD
Crawl back into your hole you jackal

Crawl back into yours.

241 posted on 09/13/2001 11:30:52 AM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: wonders
Kill them all ... nits make lice

Nope, that's a quote from Colonel Chivington (Sand Creek).

I originally said it in response to someone saying that a large destructive attack would only result in more suicide bombers. My response is simple ... if you kill them all (or at least enough of them so that they cringe at the sound of aircraft or diesel engines), there won't be any revenge attacks.

The idea worked against the American Indians.

242 posted on 09/13/2001 11:34:32 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Architect
They were conscripts of a state which had been propped up for ten years by the United States. They were slaughtered by Imperial arrogance.

What does this mean? They invaded a neighbor and got shot for their efforts, conscript or no. "Imperial arrogance" is a meaningless propaganda phrase.

If Bush had marched on to Baghdad, he might have accomplished something. The murder of people desperately attempting to retreat back to Iraq was a disgusting act which comes close to genocide and certainly violates the rules of war.

No, that is more propaganda. Shooting at retreating troops is not outside ANY "rules of war," since you may well have to fight them again if you do not do so. If, in fact, Bush had taken your advice we WOULD have had to do so. Sorry, it may have been sad and unfortunate, but troops in a war they started are fair game no matter which way they're heading at the time.

Compare that with the relatively gentle hand of Iraq in Kuwait "if you're searching for moral equivalency".

Aren't we forgetting who invaded whom? "Gentle hand?" Are you seriously suggesting we give the Iraqi invaders some sort of gratitude for not killing more of their innocent neighbors than they did?

243 posted on 09/13/2001 11:37:32 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer

244 posted on 09/13/2001 11:37:45 AM PDT by BlueLancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
Italics off?
245 posted on 09/13/2001 11:42:43 AM PDT by wonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: LadyJD the bit*ch without mercy and the other twit that needs mowing.
. IMO we should deal with this crime MERCILESSLY and COMPLETELY but then we should immediately disentangle ourselves completely from ALL foreign aid and military adventurism. Yes I mean Israel too!

Only then can we hope to live in peace.

When they came for the Protestants, I said nothing, because I was not a Protestant,
When they came for the Jews, I said nothing because I am not a Jew,

When they came for me, no one was left to help me.

You are an idiot, the bomb went off in America not overseas. Go put your head back in the sand and let the men take care of this ok?

246 posted on 09/13/2001 11:48:17 AM PDT by American in Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan, LaBelleDameSansMerci
Belle Dame:

In my opinion, you are one of the most intelligent and perceptive posters on these fora, and I usually find myself wishing, after reading one of your messages, that you would join the discussions more often. Not today.

For all of your perceptiveness, intelligence, and understanding of the great tides of history, I think you miss the larger picture here. Yes, we are a feminized culture. Yes, we have awakened to the reality of our Empire. Yes, Empire sucks virtue from the marrow of Republic. All of these things are true. And it is also true that these attacks are related to our practices and policies as an Empire. I'm here to say: that doesn't change things a bit.

God uses Empire just as he uses Republic. Without the massive infrastructure and global reach of Rome, Christ's message would have been so much harder to disseminate throughout the West. Without the civilizing influence of the British Empire, the world would be far more fragmented and culturally impoverished than it is today. Without the American Empire, communism might have truly conquered all as Russia "spread her errors throughout the world."

Witness what happens when Empires retreat into themselves. The fall of Rome in the West led to 500 years of darkness and death. The fall of Constantinople led to the establishment of a permanent Islamic threat at Europe's door. The fall of the British Empire led to the spread of communism and third world nationalism around the globe.

Empires are not perfect; in fact they are downright awful. The practice of Empire is ugly, feminizing, and demoralizing.

The alternative is worse.

247 posted on 09/13/2001 11:50:21 AM PDT by cicero's_son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: getoffmylawn
You're wasting your time, getoffmylawn. Most of the people on this forum aren't interest in reason or logic. They are filled with hatred and revenge. Most of them probably didn't take the time to read your entire post. Because it doesn't conform to their world view that perceives all Arabs as wild-eyed anti-American terrorists.
248 posted on 09/13/2001 11:52:52 AM PDT by Un-PC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: getoffmylawn
This guys may be a leftie but there is much truth to what he says.

Many people around the world hate Americans and Americans can't see why.

We must ask ourselves why. Hate doesn't come out of nowhere.

Many here in FreeRepublic condemned the US attacks on Yugoslavia and the bombings in Sudan. The Serbs hate Americans for that. The Sudanese hate Americans for that. That is a totally rational and normal reaction for them. The Serbs don't hate us because they envy our "success" and "freedom". They hate us because our government bombed their cities and killed their women and children. I think that those of you here who in the past condemned the bombings of Serbia and Sudan can understand why Serbs and Sudanese hate us.

But of course, those incidents are not the cause of these latest attacks. There is a seething hatred among Muslims for the US. And it is because of the mindless support that the US gives to Israel.

Those Muslims don't hate us because we are "successful" or "free". They don't envy us because they view us, not without cause, as morally decadent with rampant "gay rights", feminism and abortion. They hate us because of our support for Zionism. I have said it before here that Islamic terrorism is caused by Zionism and nobody listens. The US can go out and get revenge for whoever did this. But the root of it all, US support for Israel remains, and so long as that remains the terorrism problem will continue.

We can get as much revebge as we want. If we find out that Afghanistan is sheltering Bin Laden we could turn Afghanistan into a radioactive wasteland. But the terrorism will continue. The proof of this is Israel. Israel has been getting revenge for decades. It deals harshly with terrorism, without any of the civil libertarian sillyness, but yet it suffers more terorrist attacks than any nation on Earth. It is because no matter how much Israel retaliates the root cause of the terrorism, Zionist religious fundamentalism, remains.

I say we should just let the Islamic religious fundamentalists and the Zionist religious fundamentalists kill each other if they want. We shouldn't meddle in their religious disputes. So long as we meddle in the disputes of religious fanatics we are going to be targets of terrorist religious fanatics.

Anyway, where is the outrage for the 1 million per year American victims of abortion?

249 posted on 09/13/2001 11:55:47 AM PDT by Marduk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlueLancer
Ref your #242: Ah yes, Chivington, the "Butcher of Sand Creek." How could I have forgot? What a curious hero you have found for yourself.

For those who don't recall, a little about Chivington:

Chivington made good on his genocidal promise. During the early morning hours of November 29, 1864, he led a regiment of Colorado Volunteers to the Cheyenne's Sand Creek reservation, where a band led by Black Kettle, a well-known "peace" chief, was encamped. Federal army officers had promised Black Kettle safety if he would return to the reservation, and he was in fact flying the American flag and a white flag of truce over his lodge, but Chivington ordered an attack on the unsuspecting village nonetheless. After hours of fighting, the Colorado volunteers had lost only 9 men in the process of murdering between 200 and 400 Cheyenne, most of them women and children. After the slaughter, they scalped and sexually mutilated many of the bodies, later exhibiting their trophies to cheering crowds in Denver.

Chivington was at first widely praised for the "battle" at Sand Creek, and honored with a widely-attended parade through the streets of Denver just two weeks after the massacre. Soon, however, rumors of drunken soldiers butchering unarmed women and children began to circulate, and at first seemed confirmed when Chivington arrested six of his men and charged them with cowardice in battle. But the six, who included Captain Silas Soule, a personal friend of Chivington's who had fought with him at Glorietta Pass, were in fact militia members who had refused to participate in the massacre and now spoke openly of the carnage they had witnessed.

All genocidal criminals sound alike, I suppose. Goebbels, Chivington. Pol Pot's justification for slaughtering children was "kill the grass down to the root."

It appears the terrorists have won when it comes to you, at least. You stoop to their level.

250 posted on 09/13/2001 11:56:06 AM PDT by wonders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
troops in a war they started are fair game no matter which way they're heading at the time.

They were pawns. One imperial overlord forced them into an army. Another one slaughtered them because of it. The whole game is disgusting. And don't forget that the US bankrolled Saddam before he moved into Kuwait.

The million Iraqis killed by the US embargo are also pawns. There isn't even any good reason for this one.

251 posted on 09/13/2001 11:58:14 AM PDT by Architect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: LadyJD
---You are cheering the terrorists who did this. That's makes you a terrorist, I certainly am not. Are you an ADL monitor? I think that you are.

Ah HA! The ole JOO-hate peaking out from behind the mask. A little Islam in the mix? This is not about racism, this is about retribution. In case you have not noticed Americans no longer care if you think we deserve mass murder or not, we are going to relocate you to hell and you can take your beliefs with you. We tried to be nice, but...

252 posted on 09/13/2001 11:59:33 AM PDT by American in Israel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kate22
I will not read any post that starts by referring to OUR fellow bereaved FReepers as "rabid dogs" "coming out of the woodwork". Sorry, that's just how it is. Before now, I thought that was below you too.

Why should we go after the subhuman that perpetrated this mass murder when, as you apparently believe, we deserved it? Why not just drop it?

Why should we ignore the ones who gave these murderers a safe harbor in which to terrorize the civilized world? Are you aware that your proposed response to the killers is Chamberline-esc. You sound like appeasement is the ultimate answer to the problem of terrorism. How would terrorists achieving there goals end the terrorism problem? Wouldn't they be encouraged if we pulled back as a response to their terrorist activities?

Name a country that doesn't have a problem with terrorism so we can emulate them. You can't. Even France hasn't appeased the terrorists enough to stop the bombings. That tells me appeasement doesn't work.

Has the US done a lot wrong? Yes. But the good we have done far outweighs the bad. Are you suggesting the USA should be perfect, never make poor decisions? Well that's the only way to not piss any group off. My country is damned if we do, and damned if we don't. We only do the best that we can. We will continue to do the best that we can. We will not cower in the corner. We will do our best to rid this world of all those responsible for this incomprehensible deliberate attack against unsuspecting civilians. And that means those that knowingly harbor and/or finance them, and you are either with us, or against us. You have made your choice, and I have made mine.

253 posted on 09/13/2001 12:05:07 PM PDT by Gumption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Un-PC
Most of the people on this forum aren't interest in reason or logic. They are filled with hatred and revenge.

I don't hate you but I wish everyone who supports what was done to NY City had been in the WTC towers in place of those who were.

254 posted on 09/13/2001 12:06:28 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: L,TOWM
She's no lawyer just has a degree in Fantasy. Since this was an attack on Yankee institutions LadyJD is probably applauding. JD just for Just Dumb.
255 posted on 09/13/2001 12:07:17 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Kate22
"Good response to the misogynist creep." You are defending "misogynist creeps", check out this link http://members.aol.com/_ht_a/yahyam/page5/taliban.htm to see what Ben Laden and the Taliban do to women. I'm sorry to say it but you are defending pure evil.
256 posted on 09/13/2001 12:10:51 PM PDT by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Chief Inspector Clouseau
What, specifically, is your preferred response to the attack?

Three-fold.
1) Obviously the people who did this need to be brought to justice. And they will be. There's no doubt about that.
2) Let people in planes, especially the crew, arm themselves. That a 757 can be taken over by three men with razor blades is a huge indictment of the so-called security arrangements in airports.
3) STOP GETTING MIXED UP IN FOREIGN WARS. Start by acknowledging that the Isrealis need to protect themselves. If they want to occupy Palestine, let them take the consequences.

257 posted on 09/13/2001 12:18:50 PM PDT by Architect
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: D Joyce
You are a little in error about none coming to the aid of America in a time of need. Bangladesh, one of the poorest countries in the world, came to our aid during our great floods of a few years back. They send loads of sand bags, the only thing they could send.

First, I did not write the article. Second, the article was written 30 years ago (see my post 59), so it is likely Bangledesh had not offered the aid of which you speak at the time it was written. Third, the exception does not prove the rule...the article's main premise is still valid, IMHO.

But thanks for pointing out this fact about Bangledesh's generosity...I did not know that and it is nice to know SOMEONE out there made such an effort on our behalf...

258 posted on 09/13/2001 12:21:57 PM PDT by Chief Inspector Clouseau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Architect
They were pawns. One imperial overlord forced them into an army. Another one slaughtered them because of it. The whole game is disgusting.

I respectfully submit that you're retreating into generalities now, and you've obviously already equated the U.S. to Iraq in terms of being an "imperial overlord," yet another propaganda phrase that does not stand up to any sort of objective scrutiny. If you really think we were equivalent in that war, ask the Kuwaitis.

I insist that there is no shadow of moral equivalency between the Iraqi government allowing its citizens to die of a world, not a U.S. embargo (if it were only us it wouldn't kill anyone, would it?) and the deliberate targeting of innocent civilians in a terrorist attack. None. The argument has failed, give it up.

It isn't any sort of "game," it is war. There aren't any rules; if there were, 5000 people would still be alive on the East coast. It disgusts me as well. If you can think of a way to stop this without killing anyone, I'm all ears, but please don't suggest that the solution is to undo fifty years of foreign policy - that cannot be done.

259 posted on 09/13/2001 12:23:18 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
Our killing of millions of people through bombs and starvation

Who, When, Why and by Whom? Fess up or shut up! Substantiate Please!!!

I killed no one in a foreign country and I doubt anyone in the WTC did! I don't control the economy of third world countries and I doubt anyone in the WTC did. What's your point? These innocent people have suffered DEATH at the hands of Terrorist Murderers that are out of control.

Poverty stricken Americans have yet to make the news in blowing up Mecca.(sarcasm) How dare you justify, in the least, the actions of these madmen based on their impoverishment. Also, it seems that you blame the worlds problems on America!? Is this true?

Terrorism is the most hiddeous of the intrinsic evils because it PREYS on the UNSUSPECTING INNOCENT. Like a cancer, it needs to be surgically removed.

260 posted on 09/13/2001 12:26:10 PM PDT by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 361-379 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson