Posted on 09/11/2001 7:58:48 PM PDT by ouroboros
1:00 PM CST, Tuesday, September 11, 2001
In the aftermath of the greatest loss of American life in a single attack since Pearl Harbor--and probably ever--our first thoughts must be for the victims of an attack that was neither cowardly nor senseless (as it is already being called), but a well-coordinated demonstration of American vulnerability. This is a time for prayer, not analysis. Unfortunately, even the chief executive of the United States--a professing Christian--could not find the courage to pray in front of the cameras. Faced with the evidence of a probable Islamic suicide attack carried out by men--perhaps Muslims--willing to die for their beliefs, the President could only ask for a moment of silence, a prayer to nothing. Score one for the terrorists.
The terrorists also defeated the Bush advisers who deflected his return flight and sent him into hiding. Of course the President’s life is potentially threatened; but thousands of lives that were lost in New York and Washington, while the CIA was asleep at the switch. This is the same CIA, remember, who helped to install the current Islamic terrorist regime in Afghanistan--the regime that ironically said, echoing Bill Clinton, that they "feel America’s pain," and which has given asylum to Osama Bin Laden, who--although he is denying responsibility--has threatened such an attack repeatedly.
It would be wrong to blame President Bush for a decision clearly made by his top advisers, but he needs to be in the nation’s capitol, bravely defying the threats to our security. If he cannot go home, how can anyone feel secure in his home or office? A large part of the President’s responsibility is public relations, and this administration is so far flubbing its greatest challenge. As I write, the President has "gone down the rabbit hole" in hiding, according to ABC News reporter Ann Compton.
If Islamic extremists turn out to be behind these attacks, will anyone in Washington wake up to the danger they have created by humiliating Muslims in the Middle East and, simultaneously, giving them easy access to the United States, where they are building their mosques and agitating against any public expression of Christian faith? Such a response is unlikely.
What will our government do in the weeks to come? The decision to close the border is too little too late--closing the barn door once the horse thieves have got in. It is important to keep in mind that in America, every disaster will be used as a pretext for more stupid government programs. Despite the obvious fact that this kind of terrorist attack, which we have been predicting, could not have been stopped by the President's Missile Defense program, the Republicans will certainly claim that American security interests demand immediate funding. Predictably, Democratic leftists will blame the openness of our society and call for more stringent controls on guns and travel. This attack should cinch the argument for national identity cards and strengthen the hand of those who don't think we have enough police check points. The already depressed stock markets may turn suicidal, the price of oil will soar; Arafat's little rebellion has run out of steam, and President Bush will be blamed for not supporting Ariel Sharon with sufficient zeal.
Meanwhile, John McCain and Al Haig are calling for a declaration of war, only they won't say against whom; but a permanent state of war, as Chronicles Executive Editor Scott P. Richert points out, is exactly what would suit the Washington hawks who pine for the good old days of the Cold War.
Copyright 2001, www.ChroniclesMagazine.org
928 N. Main St., Rockford, IL 61103
(815) 964-5053
tri@rockfordinstitute.org
BACK TO CHRONICLES EXTRA!
Politicians don't lead prayers because they know what ever they say will be criticized. Therefore, they ask for a moment of silence. Bush could have asked a clergyman to say a few words, but he would have been attacked for that, too.
Maybe Bush didn't do the best job, but today wasn't a day for criticisms of his style or performance whether they come from Thomas Fleming or from Peter Jennings. In these critics there's an eerie detachment from what's actually happening, as well as too close an attachment to one's own positions to let a day pass without voicing them. The guy who can't resist saying when people are dying, "It's the end of an empire," or "Bush looks haggard and drawn" or "How do you feel?" deserves the worst people think of them.
See Also:
Sobran on the Unknown Enemy
Harry Browne asks "When will we learn?"
...and especially Why Many Arabs Hate America (and why tomkat hates O)
Keep fighting the good fight!
i was once priviledged to serve under General Powell,a distinguished, quiet and very able officer. that said, i'd hate to be a anti-US person ANYWHERE, as they i predict will soon be about the thickness of a coat of paint.
pray,sw
Excellently said, x.
I believe that Jennings, Fleming, several on Free Republic, et al, are somewhat demented to use this incident as a soapbox from which to preach their brand of politics.
While I have my differences with Mr. Bush, this is not the time to slit throats for our enemies and use the blood of our own to paint the killings as "patriotic." Sick indeed.
I agree that we all need to understand the reasons as to why we were attacked, as Joseph Sobran's article today so aptly states, but you are not saying that because we may have deserved this attack, we are not to retaliate and just look the other way?
For years, before America began to "police" the world, Muslims hated us simply for being allies with Israel. Our presence in countries that we have no business being in has been the excuse they've been waiting for to carry out there brand of "evangelism."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.