Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can a depression happen again?
www.rinfret.com ^ | August 19, 2001 Updated on September 8, 2001 | Pierre Rinfret

Posted on 09/09/2001 5:28:59 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate

August 19, 2001

Updated on September 8, 2001


Pierre Rinfret

Can a depression happen again?

Why not, humans know no limits to their stupidity.

Unfortunately, I have to say 'Yes, it can happen again.'

The folly of man knows no limits as the bubble that used to be the Asian boom now shows conclusively. It is never the forces of which you are aware but the ones you don't think about that always get you.

As an historian of economic and financial affairs if there is one thing I know it is that the follies and stupidities of man know no limits.

Yes, it can happen again. I hope and pray not but it is more than stupid to think or say we have licked, forever, the horrible specter of a domestic and world depression."June 1997; Depression; Internet; http://www.parida.com

Source: http://www.rinfret.com/depression.html

As of September 8, 2001: The news gets worse and worse and what is most disturbing is that no government appear to recognize what is happening and could happen; to wit a depression now appears entirely possible. The bad news has gone from manufacturing to non- manufacturing. In other words the deterioration is spreading like a cancer!

The stupidity and ignorance of the administration is hard to beat! First the President cays he is "concerned" and what that means is beyond me and what if anything he is going to do is beyond me (he refused to take questions at the press conference announcing his stately "concern").

But the incompent untrained neophyte Secretary of the Treasury is even more ludicrous in what he announced recently: I would say he suffers from th denial syndrome!

"09/08 09:44 U.S. Economy Showing Signs of Recovery, Treasury's O'Neill Says By Brendan Murray

Suzhou, China, Sept. 8 (Bloomberg) -- The U.S. economy is emerging from a slowdown that sent unemployment to a four-year high last month, reassuring Asian countries that the biggest engine of global growth won't drag the world into recession, Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said.

Joblessness in the U.S. rose in August to 4.9 percent, to the highest level since September 1997, the Labor Department said yesterday. O'Neill said the number is a ``lagging'' indicator and doesn't take into account 'anecdotal' evidence he has gathered from businesses showing company orders are increasing.

Article continued here: www.rinfret.com/depresion02.html


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last

1 posted on 09/09/2001 5:28:59 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
So, Rinfret predicted a depression in 1997. He's like that goofy professor over here at SMU, whose name I don't recall, but he's written TWO books predicting depressions: once in the '80's, once in the '90's.

Is Rinfret selling a book too?

2 posted on 09/09/2001 5:45:37 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
As more and more people start freaking out, it is probably a sign that the bottom is near.
3 posted on 09/09/2001 5:48:28 PM PDT by Mulder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Did he hit you up for one?
4 posted on 09/09/2001 5:50:35 PM PDT by It'salmosttolate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
"Can a depression happen again?

Probably not because firms nearly universally keep MUCH closer track of their sales and inventory levels and make frequent, small adjustments on a continuous basis. They are able to do this because of computerized inventory control systems and bar code tracking of inventory items and items sold. The ability to make frequent, small adjustments in purchase orders and production levels makes nationwide, or worldwide, sell-off panics of goods very, very unlikely these days. Many other safeguards are in place in the stock market and in banking as well that were instituted after the big depression of the 30s.

5 posted on 09/09/2001 6:12:11 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
I'm certainly not an economist, but on the other hand, the track record of economists can't be much worse than mine. I've often heard it said that a depression can't happen anymore because we have safeguards, checks and balances in place now that won't let a freefall occur, like the Crash and Depression of the 30's.

Well suppose all investors woke up tomorrow and decided to sell all equities because they ALL thought there was nowhere but down to go? Admittedly, this is a bit of a stretch.....this would be more likely by Wednesday morning, at the current rate.

Well, I'm sure all sorts of counteracting mechanisms would kick in when prices drop - but how long will that solution last? That's like saying, "Nope. That 10 ton weight won't drop, we got some toothpicks underneath it now." The mass and inevitability of a monolithic market move would seem to be more than a match for any puny safety contraptions backed - by what?

Sure, they can shut the market down. Then what? A massive "Nuthin' to fear but fear itself" campaign?

What am I missing here? What is truly and realistically in place to thwart a crash?

6 posted on 09/09/2001 6:34:58 PM PDT by ctonious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctonious
How about the fact that accounting standards are much better than they were in the 1920's, so that investors have much better information on which to base stock purchases?
7 posted on 09/09/2001 7:18:17 PM PDT by FreedomPoster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
How about the fact that accounting standards are much better than they were in the 1920's, so that investors have much better information on which to base stock purchases?

Has there been wildly different accounting information posted in the last 2 years to account for the 70% loss in the NASDAQ?

8 posted on 09/09/2001 7:23:31 PM PDT by ctonious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
How was it who said "economoists have predicted 12 of the last 2 recessions."
9 posted on 09/09/2001 7:33:34 PM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
Probably not because firms nearly universally keep MUCH closer track of their sales and inventory levels

Actually, even during the great depression, retail unemployment was 50% while industrial sector unemployment was 80%. So I don't think inventories of consumer goods is key. New plant construction, raw material processing and the like were hit the hardest the earliest and longest. It's pretty hard to JIT that sort of stuff -- as you're always trying to guess where consumer spending is going to be in the future. Always a tough call.

10 posted on 09/09/2001 7:35:32 PM PDT by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
It is amazing how these self-proclaimed brilliant people seem to think the reigns of the economy belong to the President. The only real economic government control lies in taxation which power lies in congress.
11 posted on 09/09/2001 7:38:06 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB
No,silly,thats why we have global war.I would be more troubled by that than a depression.Of course,war is good for the economy, WWIII is something we all need to think about.
12 posted on 09/09/2001 7:46:39 PM PDT by eastforker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
The numbers released by the guvmint have been so fudged for so long, they are meaningless. We are about to go into some real tough times for some people and it will last a long time. Maybe forever, for some.
13 posted on 09/09/2001 7:48:15 PM PDT by the gillman@blacklagoon.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
My brother said, at the top of the dotcom craze (August, 99), that it was over because he'd read a reasonable explanation of the whole rise on the front page of USAToday.

When the current slump is cogently explained on page 1 of USAToday, my advice is to buy like there's no tomorrow.

14 posted on 09/09/2001 7:51:10 PM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the gillman@blacklagoon.com
"Maybe forever, for some."

Aren't you the blithe spirit!

You're probably right, though. Like the Edwardians were surprised by the appalling realities of WWI, us 'Millenians' will be pole-axed by economic events outside our envelope of expectations.

It won't be pretty.

15 posted on 09/09/2001 8:03:18 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
The last "depression" was the planned and perpetrated theft of the industrial capacity of this nation. The next "depression" will be the planned and perpetrated theft of property! The depression wasn't an accident.
16 posted on 09/09/2001 8:08:33 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Queen Elizabeth of Iowa
Depressions are caused by credit bubbles--too much unsecured debt. Nobody ever got rich by going into debt. Rich people get rich by saving their money and investing it in PRODUCTIVE (that's a key word) enterprises. Much of the credit created in this last bubble has been invested in UNPRODUCTIVE enterprises (silly dot.coms and financial paper and derivatives of all ilk).

A market crash is a symptom of a credit bubble. That means a market crash is a symptom of depressive economic forces. Market crashes don't "cause" depressions.

We will have the most difficult economic times of our lives, because we are facing the largest debt (and I'm not talking about the national debt)of all time.

17 posted on 09/09/2001 8:12:39 PM PDT by SongathuSouth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
That's what some guy said on Louis Ruykhauser said this morning.
18 posted on 09/09/2001 8:21:17 PM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: It'salmosttolate
Maybe if everyone keeps predicting it and believing it and the "news" keeps telling the public about, maybe we will like a bad self-fullfilling prophecy.
19 posted on 09/09/2001 8:26:17 PM PDT by garyhope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SongathuSouth
Depressions are caused by credit bubbles

What is a technical definition of depression? Is it a matter of degree of unemployment, or is that a result? Someone once told me that a depression is when the currency is undergoing deflation and the economy is actually shrinking. After some number of years of such deflation and shrinking the depression would become Great.

20 posted on 09/09/2001 8:36:03 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson