Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Zimbabwe: All heads turn to SADC meeting in Harare
United Nations Integrated Regional Information Networks (IRIN) via ZNEWS ^ | September 8, 2001

Posted on 09/08/2001 6:47:36 AM PDT by Clive

author/source:IRIN (UN)
published:Sat 8-Sep-2001
posted on this site:Sat 8-Sep-2001

Article Type : News

They now actually have to look ahead and say : "you have agreed that this is what you are going to do, how is this going to happen'?"

An historic agreement between the Zimbabwean and British governments over land reform has created the ideal conditions for southern African leaders meeting in Harare on Monday to hammer out the "fine print", analysts told IRIN. The agreement announced in the early hours of Friday in Abuja, the Nigerian capital, binds the Zimbabwean government to stopping violence and restoring the rule of law, ending farm occupations and removing invaders from white-owned farms not listed for compulsory acquisition, and to transparency. It says that the British government and other donors will fund the land reform programme. It also says that the United Nations Development Programme will work with Zimbabwe's government to pursue "effective and sustainable land reform".

There was mixed reaction to the agreement brokered by Nigerian President Olusegan Obasanjo and signed by several Commonwealth foreign ministers. Some senior diplomats were cautiously optimistic, saying it remained to be seen whether President Robert Mugabe would abide by the deal because he had reneged on agreements in the past. Others said the pact had created a favourable environment for southern African leaders meeting in Harare on Monday to consolidate the agreement and to set time frames for action.

Lindiwe Sisulu, chief director of equatorial Africa and Indian Ocean islands in South Africa's foreign affairs department, told IRIN: "Abuja created a better environment for the Harare meeting. They (leaders meeting there) don't have to go back to the issues that were discussed in Abuja. They now actually have to look ahead and say (to Zimbabwe) 'you have agreed that this is what you are going to do, how is this going to happen'?" The leaders gathering in Harare were directed by the Southern African Development Community (SADC) summit in Blantyre last month to meet various stakeholders in Zimbabwe with the aim of resolving its economic, political and social crises. South African President Thabo Mbeki is expected to be joined by the presidents of Botswana, Malawi, Angola and Namibia. Senior officials from their governments were in Harare last week paving the way for the meeting.

"The SADC meeting will have to be a practical one. It will have to be about cementing the agreement in Abuja and emerging with a programme satisfactory to all," Sisulu said. There was hope that the leaders would leave Harare "with a concrete plan", she said. Eddie Maloka, executive director of the Johannesburg-based Africa Institute told IRIN he felt the SADC leaders would want "to get a sense of how Mugabe is going to go about, not only dealing with the land issue, but also stabilising the country politically - basically taking forward the Commonwealth decision (the Abuja agreement)". "Their challenge will be to come out of the meeting with concrete steps creating the conditions for the agreement to be implemented," he said. "The situation in the region is that Mugabe is making the job difficult for his colleagues. He should have been seen to be stabilising the situation. Even his colleagues who were protective of him have started being critical publicly - like South African President Thabo Mbeki."

Sanusha Naidu, senior Africa researcher at the South African Institute of International Affairs, told IRIN: "There is going to be pressure for SADC leaders to get something more tangible than just a verbal agreement to what has been decided at Abuja this morning. Now their challenge is to set time frames because there is an acknowledgment that this is no longer just a SADC problem. The fact that Obasanjo came up with a task team shows it has become a continental one. If they (SADC) drag their feet now, they have lost the battle."

After almost two years of inaction, the SADC summit in Blantyre made it clear that the walls were closing in on Mugabe. With the European Union and Commonwealth considering action against Zimbabwe that could further affect the region's economy, the bloc decided to take action. Now with the Harare meeting looming, the question is whether SADC can rise to the challenge. "The question is really should we dare to hope that the Blantyre summit set a precedent for summits to come?" Naidu wondered.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/08/2001 6:47:36 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sarcasm, nopardons, Travis McGee, backhoe, Migraine, jsraggmann, Brian Allen, Great Dane , Kate22
-
2 posted on 09/08/2001 6:47:59 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes, robnoel, wardaddy, BansheeBill, BenR2, technochick99, laconic, 68skylark, sirgawain
-
3 posted on 09/08/2001 6:48:24 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: harpseal, Gaas, Ditter, Ronin, archy, blam, JohnHuang2 , Byron_the_Aussie
-
4 posted on 09/08/2001 6:48:49 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Constitution Day, TrueBeliever9, Criminal Number 18F, Eric in the Ozarks,
-
5 posted on 09/08/2001 6:49:12 AM PDT by Clive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
What does it mean? "The United Nations will continue to work with the Zimbabwe government toward meaningful and sustainable land reform"???? I am sorry to display my ignorance, but what does the United Nations possibly have to do with private land ownership?
6 posted on 09/08/2001 6:58:07 AM PDT by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clive
To me, "land reform" has some very bad connotations- like "give us your farm or we'll take it by force..."

Maybe I'm just being too cynical, but I do not see a peaceful resolution to this coming from a government of thugs.

7 posted on 09/08/2001 7:02:04 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blackdog
I am sorry to display my ignorance, but what does the United Nations possibly have to do with private land ownership?

Don't worry, when they give your neighborhood back to some indians, you'll be able to get in line at the consulate of your "old country", and the UN will put in a good word for you.

Welcome to the New World Order.

8 posted on 09/08/2001 7:13:01 AM PDT by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson