Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Oregon Farmers Embrace Land Buy-Out Plan (Klamath Basin)
Reuters ^ | 9/07/01 | Bruce Olson

Posted on 09/07/2001 9:27:53 PM PDT by kattracks

PORTLAND, Ore (Reuters) - Many farmers hit by a devastating drought in Oregon have agreed to sell land that could be used to store water for future irrigation, environmentalists said on Friday.

The American Land Conservancy is backing the land buyout plan proposed earlier this summer to ease a long-term water shortage in southern Oregon around the so-called Klamath Basin.

The group obtained signed options to purchase about 32,000 acres from farmers, more than 10 percent of the area in the Klamath Basin irrigation project, said Rich McIntyre, a representative for the organization in southern Oregon.

Under the buy-out plan, farmers would get $3,000 an acre plus the appraised value for improvements with total cost of about $300 million.

In April, the federal government cut off irrigation to 1,000 farms in the area to save fish protected under the Endangered Species Act.

That led to months of demonstrations by farmers, including four incidents when angry residents smashed open the gates that held back the water.

The San Francisco-based Conservancy has over 10 years coordinated more than $200 million worth of land and water purchases and exchanges in the West.

But opponents of the buyout plan on Friday disputed the conservancy's figures on the amount of land that farmers have agreed to sell in southern Oregon.

A spokeswoman for the Klamath Water Foundation, a group representing farmers, said the conservancy's estimate of land that would be sold was ``way overblown. I don't think you'd get even 5 percent.''

DEAL WITH THE DEVIL?

Farmers who did agree to sell signed the options ``when people thought they no other choices,'' Lynan Baghott, a spokeswoman for the farmers, said. ``They are more encouraged now. They thought at first they were dealing with the devil.''

Yet Wendell Wood, field director of the Oregon Natural Resource Council, said many more farmers would sell if the price was right.

``Half the people in the (Klamath Basin irrigation) project would sell if they got a fair price,''

Some of the farmers agreeing to sell have been threatened by other farmers, who fear an end to the irrigation project.

``I had my head handed to me on a plate,'' farmer Keith Buckingham said after he expressed support for the plan. ``A lot has to do with fear of change, fear of the government.''

Part of the buyout proposal calls for the storage of water in what is now the dry bed of Swan Lake, east of Klamath Falls, to handle droughts like the one this year, among the driest recorded since the irrigation project began in 1907.

``We could use some intelligent engineering and store about 20 percent of the needed water in the lake. We could also build some berms, create some islands and make some habitat for the birds and eagles as well as storing water for the farmers,'' McIntiresaid.

``The overall solution is to rely more on nature and less on engineering,'' Wood said. ``This a good step. We want to see agriculture survive in the area, but we would also like to get to a point where there are harvestable surpluses of salmon.''

Members of the Yurok tribe downstream from the Klamath basin, meanwhile, have begun their fall harvest of chinook salmon and say the catch has been good.

``We didn't just get here. This has been building for a long time. We are living with the results of over-extension of the water use,'' Troy Fletcher, executive director of the Yurok tribe, said.

He said the government ``did the right thing'' this year and that the water in the Klamath River this year will pay off in the future.

The environmentalists are involved in mediation with farmers, Indian tribes, commercial fishing interests and federal agencies seeking long-term solutions to the basin's water problems.


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2001 9:27:53 PM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head, AuntB, nunya bidness, GrandmaC, Washington_minuteman,tex-oma buffyt

2 posted on 09/07/2001 9:29:52 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave A+Bert Jolly Rodgers, blackie, CyberRebel, marsh2, Benighted forester, madame x,

3 posted on 09/07/2001 9:30:03 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amom grammac, SierraWasp, Phil V. Nam Vet RottiBiz Black Agnes

4 posted on 09/07/2001 9:30:14 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Environmentalists plan all along
5 posted on 09/07/2001 9:33:02 PM PDT by tophat9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
Ping
6 posted on 09/07/2001 9:34:12 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Can this buyout be legit considering the farmers and landowners signed under duress? It appears that the American Land Conservancy and Kerr-ONRC were in the midst with buyout agreements before anyone realized how detrimental the decisions from the court were.
7 posted on 09/07/2001 9:37:32 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

8 posted on 09/07/2001 9:44:20 PM PDT by mfulstone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!You will be letting the tyranny WIN if you cave in! Don't do it!
9 posted on 09/07/2001 9:46:58 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm not sure I understand why this is bad. This SHOULD be the way the Endangered Species Act works (albeit the Feds should be buying land instead of this "Land Conservancy" group). Just like they do when they build a freeway or take any other land.
10 posted on 09/07/2001 9:49:24 PM PDT by tbeatty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbeatty
Do you have your flame proof suit on?
11 posted on 09/07/2001 9:56:10 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: klamathbasincrisis Klamath_list

12 posted on 09/07/2001 9:57:37 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All
Klamath Basin Crisis bump list forming.
13 posted on 09/07/2001 10:00:59 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: farmfriend
LOL. No. I really don't know this issue. I was always under the impression that the ESA was most cruel because it didn't compensate land owners for reducing it's value.

I can understand why people wouldn't want to move or change their livelyhood but it has to be better than starved out of land without anything. The government is taking something from these farmers and they should compensate them fairly for it.

14 posted on 09/07/2001 10:03:54 PM PDT by tbeatty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Govt has a right to erect a freeway near and over Govt. housing if passed by a board or voted on.
But where does that right other than the 6ft county lee way does the Govt. have a right to take private land that is in good standing?
16 posted on 09/07/2001 10:08:30 PM PDT by oceanperch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: tbeatty
,i>The government is taking something from these farmers and they should compensate them fairly for it.

We don't need to compansate the farmers. We need to get the government to quit taking. The environmentalists who start this with law suits don't care who buys the land, they just want the farmers off. There is a thread that explains this. Let me go look and I'll be back.

18 posted on 09/07/2001 10:16:48 PM PDT by farmfriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: swheats
The land they are talking about is in Swan Lake - about 12 miles east of Klamath falls. The farmers of Swan Lake are not part of the Klamath project.

The largest land owner in the area hosted a church picnic on his property two weeks ago and gave me all of the details. Four other area farmers were with him. They all want to sell and have wanted to sell for 20 years. Their profits have not increased and operating costs have tripled.

Their land will be flooded and the reservoir will link to the Lost River which will hit the A,B,&C canals. These people have not been forced to sell. This may actually be a good thing. The Swan Lake farmers can sell - like they've wanted to. The remaining farmers in the Klamath Basin will have access to more water.

If this thing goes off.

Bunker.

19 posted on 09/07/2001 10:18:07 PM PDT by Archie Bunker on steroids
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tbeatty
tbeatty, I believe it's deeper than just the government coming in and committing a "taking". This, from all that I've read, seems to be an action used by environmentalist to secure the farming property of those who are willing to sell for environmental special projects such as growing hemp. I'm sure there are others who are able to provide great links for background.
20 posted on 09/07/2001 10:18:22 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson