Skip to comments.
Universe 'Could Condense Into Jelly'
BBC ^
| 9-6-2001
| Helen Briggs
Posted on 09/06/2001 4:07:20 PM PDT by blam
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 last
To: VadeRetro
I'm bailing out for the evening. If the jelly gets us while I'm asleep, then ... what the hell. It was a great universe while it lasted!
To: VadeRetro
The ship lost top speed in the movies as Scott grew into a singularity himself.
To: PatrickHenry
Go ahead! Let a no-gall-bladder gimp outlast you!
To: zeugma gcruse
"The Cat Came Back" is one of my favorites, of course.
The cartoonist is from Winnipeg, I believe, and made a number of excellent animations.
My favorite's the one where a domestic squabble is overshadowed by nuclear war. Sorry, can't remember title.:-(
To: blam
Yeah but could this PB&J exapand into a universe while I eat it? Talk about filling.
To: Physicist
If you thought you were going to live 10,000 years, you'd be extremely careful at age 25, knowing that one false move could lose you almost all of your time. People would stop taking risks, and mankind would begin to stagnate.But then again, hormones know no risks . . . or do they? . . . ;-}
To: VadeRetro
And why does a vacuum need a cleaner, anyway?Excellent . . . ;-}
To: Zon
The preciousness of life would have several scientists and businesses working to capture the "contents" of the human mind so that in case of a fatal accident the person's "I-ness", sense of self and all memories could be integrated with the dead person's clone. Seems pretty much the opposite of stagnation. If you could transfer human consciousness onto a nonliving substrate (which I expect to happen someday, but not in the next 100 years), why bother with a clone? Just keep it running on the substrate, and hook up sensory apparatus. In fact, the sensory apparatus could have much higher bandwidth than human senses; life could be arbitrarily vivid and sensual, not to mention the advantages of physical robustness, small material needs, and upgradeable intelligence.
148
posted on
09/06/2001 8:07:02 PM PDT
by
Physicist
(sterner@sterner.hep.upenn.edu)
To: Physicist
If you could transfer human consciousness onto a nonliving substrate (which I expect to happen someday, but not in the next 100 years), why bother with a clone? Just keep it running on the substrate, and hook up sensory apparatus. In fact, the sensory apparatus could have much higher bandwidth than human senses; life could be arbitrarily vivid and sensual, not to mention the advantages of physical robustness, small material needs, and upgradeable intelligence. I know EXACTLY what you mean....
To: Poohbah
You forgot "Women and Minorities Hardest Hit"Well, with all the comedy writers on FR, it didn't
take long for someone to correct that mistake.
If you aren't among the first six posters on a thread
around here, all the sophisticated humor is taken
by the time you get to the last post. Life's a beach.
150
posted on
09/06/2001 8:40:25 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: VadeRetro
Scientists at working at the Princeton Unbelievable Physics Department have recently discovered that our Universe lies between two enormous slices of bread. At the time of this writing, they are still wrangling over what *kind* of bread, but the majority of the group favored 'Wonder' as the bread slices seemed "amazingly soft, chewy, and enriched with vitamins."
No word on how this will affect the physical constants of the Universe or when God will take the Big Bite, but theorists warn, "It could happen at any time. I mean, who can tell when God thinks it's lunchtime?"
More details to follow.
Tuor
151
posted on
09/06/2001 9:23:30 PM PDT
by
Tuor
To: Tuor
Have you considered what immortality would do to the population and morals of this planet. No doubt the "til death do us part" thingy would most certainly lose its appeal.
152
posted on
09/07/2001 4:44:32 AM PDT
by
Sandy
To: Tuor
Is there life after digestion? Can we survive as intestinal free-riders in the Great Gut? Perhaps--Dare we even hope--assimilation with Him? Or does it end once and for all in a Great Flush?
To: blam
Hey if this starts happening I'm standing next Nadler. It's our best chance for survival. If anyone can eat their way to survival, he is the one.
To: blam
See... there's always room for Jello!
To: Physicist
why bother with a clone? Just keep it running on the substrate, and hook up sensory apparatus. In fact, the sensory apparatus could have much higher bandwidth than human senses; life could be arbitrarily vivid and sensual, not to mention the advantages of physical robustness, small material needs, and upgradeable intelligence.I've thought about that and the benefits you mention. Very cool. I also think having all that integrated real-time with a body would be awesome. ...Physically robust with smart materials integrated with the body. Upgradeable intelligence would be great for getting up to speed on almost any project. Want to learn a different field in record time. Concept/idea today, prototype tomorrow, marketing and production the day after, distribution the following day.
156
posted on
09/07/2001 1:22:21 PM PDT
by
Zon
To: Zon; Focault's Pendulum
{Sigh} I should have taken the blue pill.
157
posted on
09/07/2001 2:16:25 PM PDT
by
Ramius
To: blam
Great! I hope it's grape jelly! (My favorite)
To: headsonpikes
Has anyone seen Schroedinger's cat...lately? There he is... uh, no... Oh wait, there he is! Oops, missed again... Damn that Heisenberg!
Mark
159
posted on
09/07/2001 2:49:17 PM PDT
by
MarkL
To: Ramius
LOL ...There was a blue pill?
160
posted on
09/07/2001 3:12:14 PM PDT
by
Zon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson