Posted on 11/11/2026 2:00:32 PM PST by nickcarraway
Yes, that's as ominous as it sounds.
Despite being excited to see some Republicans lose control of the Congress, I'm already dreading the Democrats' takeover, especially what it will mean for tech policy. Doing nothing to allay this feeling is this Reclaim the Net peek at Democratic proposals regarding artificial intelligence.
Voter animosity toward AI was strong in the midterm elections, and Democrats apparently plan to waste no time using their forthcoming majority to start giving the government much more control over the AI industry and AI outputs.
You are reading Sex & Tech, from Elizabeth Nolan Brown. Get more of Elizabeth's sex, tech, bodily autonomy, law, and online culture coverage.
"Top of the Democratic agenda on day 1 needs to be a pause on advanced AI development, regulation of this out of control industry, and a ban on artificial superintelligence," posted U.S. Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D–Ariz.) the day after the election.
A Democrat-led Congress will call AI companies in for hearings and insist on "reasonable guardrails on AI," Rep. Ted Lieu (D–Calif.), vice chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said at a post-election press conference.
Guardrails sound quaint. Moderate. Who could oppose guardrails?
But "the 'guardrails' Lieu and other Democrats want to put in place are those that would give the authorities the power to decide who can build and use software, and under what conditions," Reclaim the Net's Dan Frieth writes.
"Guardrails" mean letting foreign entities persist in building more powerful AI while U.S. companies lag behind. Or letting federal regulators pick winners and losers in the U.S. AI market, opening us up to political corruption (does anyone really want the Trump administration using this power?) and giving Washington undue influence on all aspects of AI development and deployment.
(If the federal government has the power to say whether your company can expand or even exist, you're unlikely to say no to many of its demands, even if those demands are things like robot weapons and mass surveillance machines.)
"Guardrails" mean telling companies that chatbots must monitor and report more conversations to authorities. That they must stop the spread of "misinformation"—as defined by whoever is in power, of course. (What could go wrong?) That they must ban minors by verifying everyone's identity.
Guardrails mean less privacy for all AI users and less free speech.
"Guardrails" might also mean giving people, including attorneys general, more power to sue AI companies—something that invites all sorts of culture war–based lawsuits, if the way things have played out on social media is any indication. It means politicians and personal injury lawyers continuing to scapegoat Big Tech for social maladies. And demanding crackdowns on "harmful" content that leads to censorship of sexuality, mental health information, and more.
Some incoming Democrats also campaigned on AI restrictions. For instance, Colorado Democratic Rep.-elect Manny Rutinel supported "age checks and parental controls on AI chatbots for minors," which of course means identity checks for everybody.
Rep.-elect Scott Wiener (D–Calif.) supported "a comprehensive federal framework covering disclosure requirements for AI-generated political content, real civil and criminal penalties for weaponized deepfakes, and platform accountability for the amplification of synthetic disinformation."
"There are real harms that can come from AI, and there is a need to pay attention to how the government uses this technology – but the flurry of bills and statements we are seeing from Democrats, who will soon be in control of Congress, is not about that," suggests Frieth. Rather, it focuses on giving government actors more control of who can use AI, who can build AI, and what AI can say.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
How about eliminating AI altogether?
Can the government Constitutionally do that?
Better hope Elon doesn’t change sides
And then China will take over the world.
From my observations, that appears to be the plan...
AI, or President Trump likes to call it, SI, is a fact of life. Either the US reigns supreme in the field of expanding AI, or the lead in that defaults to China, specifically the CCP. Since the Democrat Socialists are the ally within the US of the CCP, it stands to reason that the Democrat demands to “control” or “limit” the application of various forms of artificial intelligence have the full backing and encouragement of the CCP, just another front in the ongoing state of adversity between the US and China.
You funny.
Good find
(”Guardrails” mean telling companies that chatbots must
monitor and report more conversations to authorities.
That they must stop the spread of “misinformation”)
Freedom Schmeedom
Welcome to ‘1984’
You vill think zee proper thoughts
Or perhaps you will not
be able to BUY or SELL
“How about eliminating AI altogether?”
—————
I’m sure that your ancestors were against rubbing two sticks together to produce fire. After all, fire is dangerous and hard to understand.
Fool. The rest of the world wants us to slow down so that they can catch up and pass us. Stopping AI now is like stopping the Manhattan Project in 1943. It’s just stupid.
The big boys in the market will pull their strings. They know sh** about AI.
That’s why we have president Trump.
That’s why we have president Trump.
Weaponized AI, to be used against anyone the Democrats consider an enemy.
Democrats smell power.
The idiots think they can control it.
Your sentiment is completely wrong in the competitive industry environment. Democrats will lose a lot of credibility with this.
Likely what they want is to force AI into highly regulated systems which they themselves alone are allowed to control.
In Bloomington, Indiana, you can be fined $2500 per day for using your web browser to access AI intelligence.
https://x.com/KaceeRAllen/status/2119506426309886368
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.