Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Zuckerberg told Meta directors he might leave California, where he could lose billions to a wealth tax. Meta answered with a new class of stock
Fortune via MSN ^ | 10/22/2026 | Amanda Gerut

Posted on 10/22/2026 4:17:27 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg intends to maintain control over the company he founded in 2004, and a new class of stock will help him do just that.

On Wednesday as Meta released third-quarter earnings results, the company announced that it would issue a new share class of Class C stock. The share class, which is technically a one-for-one stock dividend of new Class C shares, will be distributed to all shareholders. It was conceived following months of extensive negotiations that grew contentious at times between Zuckerberg and board members, including DoorDash CEO Tony Xu, Ambassador Robert Kimmitt, and ex–Microsoft executive Charles Songhurst. Xu disclosed his personal friendship with Zuckerberg but said it wouldn’t impair his judgment. At one point, the committee even talked about resigning if they couldn’t come to a resolution.

According to a Meta filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, Zuckerberg wanted to be able to maintain his voting control; meet his pledges to fund the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative with his Meta stock; and be prepared to pay billions to the State of California if a proposed wealth tax is approved by voters in November.

The proposed wealth tax, however, came around the same time as a decision by the company in late 2025 that Meta needed to raise outside capital to help fund the AI boom. Zuckerberg holds about 60.6% of voting control at Meta, while his stake constitutes about 13.4% of the company.

Like other major tech companies, Meta maintains a dual-class share structure, where Class A shares trade on Nasdaq as a one-vote-one-share stock. Conversely, Zuckerberg’s holdings are made up of mostly Class B shares, which carry 10 votes/share, which is how he maintains majority control. The condition on supercharged Class B shares is if Zuckerberg sells them, they convert to Class A.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: billionaires; california; classc; demagogicparty; markzuckerberg; meta; wealthtax; zuckerberg

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


1 posted on 10/22/2026 4:17:27 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Proposition 40 in California, known as the wealth tax, is up for a vote on Nov. 3, and if it passes, it could hit Zuckerberg and the wealthiest in the state with a multibillion-dollar bill. The Bloomberg Billionaires Index lists him at No. 5 with a net worth of $246 billion.

In July, Zuckerberg told Kimmitt, who is Meta’s lead independent director, that selling his Class B stock to cover what he might owe for the wealth tax could cut his voting stake back down to 53%.

The tax came up in a conversation between the two after negotiations between Zuckerberg and the committee appeared to grow tense. The committee had suggested shareholder-friendly sunset provisions that would see the Class B shares convert into regular stock within a year of Zuckerberg’s eventual death or departure from Meta—or if he sold more than half his holdings. During a call with Kimmitt in July, the two discussed the wealth tax and noted that Zuckerberg had only taken a $1 salary from Meta since 2013.


2 posted on 10/22/2026 4:19:31 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There are so many stupid voters in California, illegal aliens who illegally vote and vote fraud that I believe Prop 40 will pass.

At the moment (if polls are to be believed):

“The latest Citrin-POLITICO poll (October 19) found 46% in favor and 43% opposed, a result consistent with a UC Berkeley IGS survey from September showing 45% support and 42% opposition.”

As for California’s billionaires:

“Seven billionaires have publicly left California before the proposed 5% wealth tax (Proposition 40).

These departures removed approximately $540 billion in wealth from the potential tax base, representing roughly 30% of the state’s billionaire population.”


3 posted on 10/22/2026 4:27:08 PM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The leaders of CA are ignorant of basic economics and just look for ways to steal other people’s money. The $16.90 minimum wage is decreasing the number of people working.


4 posted on 10/22/2026 4:28:22 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

RE: These departures removed approximately $540 billion in wealth from the potential tax base, representing roughly 30% of the state’s billionaire population.”

Here’s a question — Doesn’t California have an EXIT TAX, to discourage the rich from fleeing?


5 posted on 10/22/2026 4:28:47 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

THEY TRIED THAT-—IT DIDN’T FLY


6 posted on 10/22/2026 4:31:14 PM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

246 billions net worth.
5% tax means he is to pay over 12 billions.
Sorely he can afford it!😁😁😁


7 posted on 10/22/2026 4:32:52 PM PDT by AZJeep (sane )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“California does not currently have an enacted exit tax. There is no law that charges a fee or imposes a tax simply for moving out of the state.”

Not yet - Newsom is trying to implement one - even more reason for billionaires to leave.


8 posted on 10/22/2026 4:41:58 PM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Washington state passed a Wealth Tax - 9.9% on every $1 million earned - in a recent election.

We will vote Yes-No to repeal it during the next couple weeks.

Polls say repeal is not going to happen.

I cannot figure out why this tax is NOT unlawful.

Our state constitution requires that ALL residents must pay the same tax percent on ALL income.

Our current state income tax rate is 0%.

Graduated tax rates in Washington state are - or use to be - unlawful!

9 posted on 10/22/2026 4:48:36 PM PDT by zeestephen (2024 Trump Landslide - Kamala Harris Lost By 230,000 Votes In WI, MI, and PA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

WGAF?


10 posted on 10/22/2026 5:00:04 PM PDT by thesligoduffyflynns (🎄🎆🎄🎆🎄🎆 JESUS IS THE REASON FOR THE SEASON🎄🎆🎄🎆🎄🎆 MERRY CHRISTMAS!🎄🎄🎄)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For tax and security reasons, the really rich should always rent.


11 posted on 10/22/2026 5:08:18 PM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not what I heard Today on TV Stocks channel.


12 posted on 10/22/2026 5:19:29 PM PDT by Linda Tripp (America's Best Best Friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I thought the CIA founded Facebook.


13 posted on 10/22/2026 6:24:41 PM PDT by roving
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AZJeep

RE: 5% tax means he is to pay over 12 billions.
Sorely he can afford it

Make it 90%, why does he need $240 billion? He’d still be a billionaire at that tax rate. After all the bureaucrats in CA know better how to use that money than Zuckerberg himself /sarc


14 posted on 10/23/2026 6:51:13 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Prop 40 will pass because the dims want it to pass.
Remember, they count the votes.

There will be a huge ripple effect when the billionaires leave the state. People at that wealth level spend lots more on ordinary things than we do.

Housekeepers, landscapers, caterers, high end cars, private planes and large yachts.

The tax will suck money away from the rich, but will put a lot of people out of work.


15 posted on 10/23/2026 8:45:32 AM PDT by Texas resident ( We finally have an American President again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson