Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 10/22/2026 6:03:54 AM PDT by FLT-bird
EXTREMELY IMPORTANT 🚨 Federal Lawsuit against California shows that 28.8% of noncitizens in California HAVE A VOTING HISTORY
California elections are not legitimate, noncitizens are voting at an extremely large scale
- Los Angeles County elections officials took a sample batch of 200 ballots - The 200 ballots were taken from a sample of 20,000 that the Trump Admin says are noncitizens - Of the 200 ballots that were taken, 71.2% of the 200 have no voting history
This means 28.8% of the noncitizens ballots DID have a voting history
Nearly 30% of noncitizens are voting in California elections based on this sample. I’ll bet it’s much higher
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 which requires states to maintain clean voter rolls and ensure that only US citizens can vote. California is willfully violating that by allowing non citizens to vote. As such, the federal government needs to take over the administration of elections in California until such time as California can demonstrate to the SCOTUS that it can and will lawfully administer elections.
>>Nearly 30% of noncitizens are voting in California elections based on this sample. I’ll bet it’s much higher
Technically, that only proves that votes are being cast for almost 30% of non-citizens; it doesn’t prove the non-citizens actually cast the votes.
Given that the voting takes place by mail, what really happens is hidden by the mail in process
California is willfully violating that by allowing non citizens to vote.Not true.
California is encouraging illegals to vote.
You make a good point, and with the level of “Ballot harvesting” in CA, that 28% is likely in large part done through those mechanisms...but the fact remains....if this data is accurate, the overwhelming majority of those votes go to the Dems...meaning they get at least a 25% advantage in elections.
California is willfully violating that by allowing non citizens to vote.
Not true.
California is encouraging illegals to vote.
> Technically, that only proves that votes are being cast for almost 30% of non-citizens; it doesn’t prove the non-citizens actually cast the votes.
it seems to imply that California (the California Secretary of State along with the Governor) cannot claim that all ballot signatures are verified to be legally legitimate (yes?).
A very tiny number of legal immigrants don't speak English.
200 is a real small sample.
“Technically, that only proves that votes are being cast for almost 30% of non-citizens; it doesn’t prove the non-citizens actually cast the votes.“
Exactly.
The illegal aliens are just voting for Democrats that Californians won’t vote for.
Remember this next time you think Californians are getting what the voted for.
Thank dems for not following the law.
If it can’t be handled any other way, how about just not accepting ANY California votes until they get this straightened out?
If it can’t be handled any other way, how about just not accepting ANY California votes until they get this straightened out?
Related:
Sydney Sweeney votes in California.
https://x.com/BasedMikeLee/status/2112958366733733918?s=20
“The SCOTUS should strip California of the power..”
Yeah, as if that will happen
And the DOJ should arrest California State and City Election Board administrators and ship them to Gitmo for interrogation.
True. But in either case, it proves that California is violating its constitutional obligations to have a republican form of government and it is violating obligations to maintain clean voter rolls as set forth by Congress in the National Voter Registration Act. It is doing so willfully and systematically. As such, the federal courts need to strip California of its power to administer elections just as they imposed pre clearance on the Southern states when they were violating the 14th amendment and the Voting Rights Act when they were disenfranchising Black voters in the early 1960s. The federal courts have already established this precedent.
Every invalid ballot that is counted disenfranchises a valid voter.
The federal courts did exactly this when they imposed pre clearance on the Southern states when they were violating the 14th amendment and the voting rights act by disenfranchising Black voters in the early 1960s.
Who can vote is not a partisan issue. Its fundamental to the constitution.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.