Posted on 08/31/2026 6:37:53 PM PDT by SharpRightTurn
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer is turning up the pressure on the U.S. Senate, demanding to know why legislation requiring proof of citizenship and voter identification remains stalled despite what he described as overwhelming public support.
Appearing on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Emmer argued that the Republican-controlled House has repeatedly done its job by passing major pieces of the GOP agenda — only to watch them languish in the Senate.
“The House has been working,” Emmer said. “We’ve been getting our stuff over to the Senate. The Senate’s got to start to perform.”
Among the legislation Emmer singled out was the SAVE America Act, which would establish new federal election-integrity requirements centered on citizenship verification and voter identification.
“We sent the SAVE America Act several times, and it sits over there languishing in the Senate,” Emmer said.
The Minnesota Republican also pointed to the CLARITY Act on digital assets and what he called “Reconciliation 3.0” as additional House priorities awaiting Senate action.
But Emmer reserved some of his strongest criticism for the Senate’s apparent inability to assemble the votes necessary to advance the SAVE America Act.
Guest host Cheryl Casone noted that it remained unclear whether Senate Majority Leader John Thune had enough support to move the legislation.
Emmer was incredulous.
“What’s coming out of the Senate? Everybody has heard them say, ‘We don’t have the votes.’ Really?” Emmer asked. “You don’t have the votes for something that is an 80 percent issue across this country?”
Emmer said the basic principles behind the legislation should be straightforward: voters should establish that they are U.S. citizens and verify their identity when casting a ballot.
“People believe it’s reasonable that in order to vote in this country, you must first establish that you are a lawful citizen,” Emmer said.
He continued by arguing voters should also be required to confirm their identity with photo identification.
“That’s an 80 percent issue,” Emmer said.
The House GOP whip then challenged senators who claim the votes simply are not there to explain exactly which provisions they oppose.
“When you say you don’t have the votes, tell us what the problem is,” Emmer said. “What exactly do you disagree with when it comes to the American people? And they are not telling us that.”
The confrontation comes as Congress prepares for a compressed legislative stretch, with lawmakers facing government funding and other major deadlines.
Emmer said the House expects to address a continuing resolution that would fund the federal government through December 11, along with appropriations measures and a surface transportation bill.
But his message to the Senate was unmistakable: the House has already sent over major pieces of the Republican agenda, and senators now need to act.
“It really is going to be on the Senate’s shoulders to start getting something done when we get back,” Emmer said.
With the SAVE America Act still hanging in the balance, the pressure is increasingly shifting toward Senate Republicans — and toward an uncomfortable question raised by Emmer:
If citizenship verification and voter ID really command the level of public support he says they do, why can’t the Senate find the votes?
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
If they wait any longer the States can claim “It’s too late.”
After all, it takes time to print all those extra ballots.
The House should shut down the government until the SAVE Act passes the Senate. It can be done if there is some backbone.
Evidently Trump does not wish to use his legal right to declare the national emergency over voting security.
Federal judges are not shy about using power that they don’t have.
Would it not be great if the Trump administration had a tenth of the zeal to apply its legitimate power as Federal judges have to apply power they do not legitimately possess.
No one in either body is entitled to “put the other body on notice”, whatever that is supposed to mean.
What gets me is that the Republican led senate won’t even force the Democrats to go on the record in regards to the SAVE America Act. It’s an 80/20 issue. The Republicans could use the Democrat’s ‘no’ votes in future campaign ads. It’s a win/win for Republicans. In other words, even if the Republicans don’t have the votes, they could use the issue to punish the Democrats.
Tom Daschle?
Trump’s feelings toward Thune is pretty well known. His actions toward Thune after November will be greatly anticipated as the SD senator is up in ‘28. Same for Murkowski.
I tell you man it’s gonna be awesome.
“The House should shut down the government until the SAVE Act passes the Senate. It can be done if there is some backbone.”
That’s an interesting proposition.
Follow the money.
Senators who fail to support citizen voting —- when it’s an 80/20 issue —- are selling their anti votes for $$
Like just imagining Soroznazi front groups, etc
“Tom Daschle?”
I haven’t thought about that guy in years.
💪
It is very sad. It might not seem like it, but even states like Rhode Island, Delaware, Connecticut, Massachusetts, New York, etc have stand up people there too and deserve decent people as Senators.
Emmer is going to have to whip Thune and Ditch.
South Dakota can back those proven to be a bit hinky.
GEORGE McGOVERN won but M@$$ in 1972....
GEORGE McGOVERN won only M@$$ in 1972....
If we lose control of Congress this fall it’s clearly because of Senate Republicans and their ‘never do anything big’ attitude. Thune won’t even call a vote on an 80-20% issue and that’s ridiculous. We all know what the democrats would do if the situation were reversed and they had the Senate and it was a bill that they wanted to pass.
“What gets me is that the Republican led senate won’t even force the Democrats to go on the record in regards to the SAVE America Act. It’s an 80/20 issue. The Republicans could use the Democrat’s ‘no’ votes in future campaign ads. It’s a win/win for Republicans. In other words, even if the Republicans don’t have the votes, they could use the issue to punish the Democrats.”
____________________________________________________________
“In 1789, after returning from serving as U.S. Minister in France, Thomas Jefferson reputedly asked George Washington, while they were having breakfast one morning, why Washington had agreed to the creation of the United States Senate in the Constitution. Noting the saucer on which Jefferson’s hot coffee, or tea, rested, Washington explained, “we pour our legislation into the senatorial saucer to cool it.” No one knows if this story is really true, but it nonetheless nicely captures what the Framers hoped to achieve in establishing the United States Senate.” The Constitution Center.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.