Posted on 08/26/2026 6:59:50 AM PDT by Cronos
A teenage Muslim schoolgirl in India has been denied the right to wear her hijab to school after a High Court ruled she had failed to prove that wearing the headscarf constitutes an “essential religious practice” of Islam.
The ruling was issued by the Allahabad High Court in the northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh and has renewed debate over religious freedom, Muslim women’s rights and school dress codes in India.
According to a consensus of Islamic scholars, hijab is obligatory on Muslim females once they reach puberty.
The case was brought by Sukaina Rizvi, who is 15 or 16, at Tagore Public School in Prayagraj. She had sought admission to Class 11 while asking to continue wearing a headscarf with the school uniform.
According to her petition, Rizvi had worn the hijab since childhood and had previously been allowed to wear it while studying at the same school from Classes 6 to 10.
She argued that preventing her from wearing the headscarf violated her fundamental rights under India’s Constitution, including protections for freedom of expression and freedom of religion.
A two-judge bench of the Allahabad High Court dismissed her petition.
The judges said that simply describing something as a religious practice was not enough to bring it within the protection of Article 25 of India’s Constitution, which guarantees freedom of conscience and the right to freely profess, practise and propagate religion, subject to constitutional restrictions.
The court said Rizvi had not provided sufficient factual or legal material to demonstrate that wearing the hijab was an essential practice of Islam, saying: “A claim, placing reliance upon Article 25 of the Constitution, cannot be accepted for the sake of mere assertion, without the necessary factual and legal foundation.”
Court backs school uniform policy
The court also upheld the school’s right to enforce its uniform policy, provided the rules are applied uniformly, genuinely and without discrimination.
It said a common uniform can help maintain discipline, institutional identity and what it described as a religion-neutral environment within an educational institution.
The school had argued that allowing an exemption for one student could create administrative and disciplinary difficulties. It also pointed out that other Muslim girls at the school were following the prescribed uniform.
The judges rejected the argument that Rizvi’s previous permission to wear the hijab meant the school could no longer change its policy.
The fact that the school had allowed her to wear the headscarf for several years, the court said, did not prevent it from subsequently enforcing its uniform rules.
India’s continuing hijab debate
The decision comes after years of legal disputes across India over Muslim students wearing the hijab in schools and colleges.
The Allahabad High Court referred to earlier judgments from the Karnataka, Kerala and Bombay High Courts.
It placed particular emphasis on a 2022 ruling by the Karnataka High Court, which held that wearing the hijab was not an “essential religious practice” of Islam and therefore did not qualify for constitutional protection under Article 25 in that case.
Meanwhile, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board has indicated that it is likely to challenge the Allahabad High Court ruling, potentially taking the case to the Supreme Court.
Maulana Khalid Rasheed Farangi Mahali, chairman of the Islamic Centre of India and an executive committee member of the AIMPLB, argued that hijab is an integral part of Islam supported by the Qur’an and Hadith, and said Muslim girls who choose to wear hijab should not be discriminated against at school. He has called for the ruling to be reviewed.
And Asaduddin Owaisi, of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) and the MP for Hyderabad, described the judgment as an “attack on Islam”and questioned the judiciary’s role in determining what constitutes an essential Islamic practice.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
JUST DONT GO TO COUNTRIES THAT DONT SUPPORT YOUR RELIGIOUS BELIEFS AND EXPECT *THEM* TO CHAGE!!!
bttt
Well, that settles it that.
I kid, of course. I would now expect some Islam-inspired violence to break out. And that’s because infidels have no right to set boundaries for Muslims.
🙁
She’s in India. If she doesn’t like it, she can go to Pakistan, which was split off specifically due to the number of muslim residents.
Customary formal garments do NOT include the hijab in most historic Muslim societies. This was an artificial demand made upon females to “prove” their dedication to the principles of Islam, made at a time when the mullahs and ayatollahs were unsure of their authority, and sincerely believed that enforcing an extreme demand upon the masses, that conformity would be assured and deviation would be severely dealt with.
Much like the Mao suits that were forced upon the members of the Chinese Communist Party years ago, but they have been largely abandoned.
The Islamic theocrats would be well advised to do the same.
Uttar Pradesh Is utterly practical in this regard. We should follow suit.
Centre to X after Musk announces greater visibility on govt censorship
Deep-seated insecurities evolving from MPS (Micro-Penile Syndrome) brought about from rampant inbreeding will lead to male over-compensation.
This is all moot anyway, because she'll be quitting school as soon as she's married off to a monied elderly lech.
I have never heard of the “right to wear a hijab”
when did someone make that up ?
She argued that preventing her from wearing the headscarf violated her fundamental rights under India’s Constitution, including protections for freedom of expression and freedom of religion.
Ha! Try that “freedom of religion” in a muslim country and see how far you get! Islam has zero tolerance for other religions.
Narendra Modi and the BJP are probably the Third World leader and political party who I most admire. Modi and the BJP get criticized for discrimination against all Non-Hindus in India (including Indian Christians, Buddhists, etc), but the fact is that BJP’s Hindu nationalism are what make it such an effective opponent of creeping Islamism among India’s Muslim minority - including the violent extremists in Kashmir. Policies such as this one help keep them in their place.
SO, Muslim parents should homeschool.
Nobody was forcing him to eat those items and alternatives were available, the Muslim question was offended by the idea of anyone else being offered to eat anything that wasn't Halal. His notion was that everyone in the UK should change their lives to accommodate his beliefs, as opposed to making the logical conclusion and returning to whatever Muslim-majority country he came from where he'd feel more at home.
There is an old saying: ‘when in Rome, do as the Romans’.
With Muslims, it’s: ‘when in Rome, we do as we wish’.
How come a country like India can figure this out but America can’t?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.