Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 08/20/2026 7:42:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Total federal debt reached approximately $40.047 trillion on August 18, 2026, according to the Treasury Department’s Debt to the Penny database. That included roughly $32.27 trillion held by the public and $7.78 trillion in obligations held within the federal government.
The milestone is difficult to comprehend in isolation. But the speed of the increase makes it more alarming.
A decade ago, total federal debt stood near $19.4 trillion. America has therefore added more than $20 trillion to its debt burden in approximately ten years. It took the country more than two centuries to accumulate its first $20 trillion—and roughly a decade to add the next $20 trillion.
This is not just a political talking point or an abstract number on a government website. The consequences are increasingly appearing in the bond market, the federal budget and the borrowing costs confronting American households.
The federal government recorded a massive $432.3 billion budget deficit in July, the largest monthly deficit since March 2021. The cumulative shortfall for the first ten months of fiscal 2026 was approaching $1.8 trillion, according to the Treasury Department’s July Monthly Treasury Statement.
Interest expenses are also approaching levels that were once considered almost unimaginable. The government has spent roughly $1.1 trillion servicing its debt during the current fiscal year, making interest one of the largest line items in the entire federal budget.
For investors, the $40 trillion milestone signals something bigger than excessive government spending. It suggests that the United States may be moving into a more volatile financial environment in which interest rates stay higher, Treasury borrowing competes with private investment and fiscal policy has less room to respond to the next crisis.
The United States has operated with government debt for virtually its entire history. Debt itself is not necessarily destructive when it finances productive investments, responds to national emergencies or remains manageable relative to the size of the economy.
The current concern is the trajectory.
| Debt milestone | Approximate date | Time to next milestone |
|---|---|---|
| $19.4 trillion | 2016 | — |
| $20 trillion | 2017 | About five years to $30 trillion |
| $30 trillion | 2022 | About 4½ years to $40 trillion |
| $40 trillion | August 2026 | Unknown |
Several forces drove the increase.
Washington approved extraordinary spending during the COVID-19 pandemic, when businesses were closed, unemployment surged and the economy faced the possibility of a prolonged depression. Those programs contributed trillions of dollars to the debt, but emergency spending is only part of the story.
Persistent deficits existed before the pandemic and continued after it.
The federal government routinely spends more than it collects. Social Security and Medicare expenses are rising as the population ages. Defense spending remains elevated. Tax revenues fluctuate with economic conditions and legislative changes. And now, interest payments on previously accumulated debt are becoming a major source of new borrowing.
This last factor creates a dangerous feedback loop:
That cycle is especially difficult to break when interest rates remain elevated.
The $40 trillion figure represents gross federal debt, which includes both debt held by the public and intragovernmental holdings.
Debt held by the public is the more market-sensitive figure. It represents Treasury securities owned by investors, financial institutions, pension funds, mutual funds, the Federal Reserve, foreign governments and other outside holders.
As of August 18, publicly held debt was approximately $32.27 trillion.
This portion matters because Treasury must continually issue, refinance and pay interest on it. When investors demand higher yields to purchase government bonds, Washington’s financing costs rise.
The Congressional Budget Office projects that federal debt held by the public will equal about 101% of gross domestic product in 2026 and rise to 120% of GDP by 2036. That would exceed the previous post-World War II record of 106% reached in 1946.
CBO also expects the annual deficit to rise from approximately $1.9 trillion in fiscal 2026 to $3.1 trillion by 2036 if current laws generally remain unchanged. Deficits would average considerably more than their historical share of the economy, with rising net interest costs driving much of the increase, according to the agency’s 2026–2036 budget outlook.
These projections are not guaranteed. Congress could reduce spending, increase revenue or enact reforms that improve economic growth. Inflation could also increase nominal GDP and reduce debt as a percentage of the economy.
But without significant policy changes, the baseline direction is clear: more debt, larger interest payments and less financial flexibility.
The most immediate threat is not that the United States suddenly runs out of dollars. Because Treasury borrows in a currency issued by the United States, an abrupt conventional default is unlikely unless caused by political failure surrounding the debt ceiling.
The more realistic danger is that debt service gradually consumes a larger share of the federal budget.
When interest rates were near zero, Washington could carry a growing debt burden at a relatively low cost. That environment has disappeared.
As older Treasury securities mature, the government must often replace them with new debt carrying much higher interest rates. The entire $40 trillion balance does not reset at once, but refinancing progressively raises the government’s average cost of borrowing.
Interest expense has now moved above $1 trillion over the current fiscal year. That means an increasing portion of federal revenue is being used not to build infrastructure, strengthen national defense, fund retirement benefits or reduce taxes—but simply to service past borrowing.
Rising interest costs can eventually force Washington into politically difficult choices:
None of these options is painless for investors or households.
Long-term Treasury yields have climbed sharply since late June, reaching levels not seen since before the 2008 financial crisis.
The rise reflects several overlapping concerns: persistent inflation, heavy Treasury issuance, growing federal deficits, rising term premiums and uncertainty about how aggressively the Federal Reserve will defend price stability.
There is another source of competition for capital. Major technology companies are financing enormous investments in artificial intelligence infrastructure, semiconductors, power generation and data centers. That surge in corporate borrowing comes as Treasury must also sell massive quantities of government debt.
In simple terms, Washington and corporate America are competing for investors’ money.
When the supply of bonds increases faster than demand, issuers may need to offer higher yields. That can raise borrowing costs across the economy.
Treasury responded on August 19 by announcing that it would at least double the maximum size of certain long-term debt buybacks. Beginning September 9, the cap for liquidity-support operations involving securities in the 10- to 30-year range will increase from $2 billion to at least $4 billion per operation.
The Treasury Department said the change was intended to provide additional liquidity support in longer-dated securities, where it has received substantial offers from market participants. The increased buybacks are scheduled to continue through the current refunding quarter ending November 4, according to the official Treasury announcement.
These operations may improve market functioning, but they do not reduce the national debt. Treasury is effectively buying back older securities while continuing to issue new debt to fund the government.
The policy can smooth disruptions in the Treasury market. It cannot repair the underlying fiscal imbalance.
Treasury yields influence nearly every financial asset.
A higher risk-free rate gives investors a more attractive alternative to stocks. If investors can earn a competitive return from government bonds, they may become less willing to pay elevated prices for companies whose expected profits lie years in the future.
This is especially important for expensive growth and technology stocks.
Stock valuations frequently depend on discounting future cash flows back to the present. When the discount rate rises, the present value of those future profits falls. That is one reason long-duration technology stocks can be particularly sensitive to changes in Treasury yields.
Higher yields can also increase corporate interest expenses. Companies that depend heavily on debt may face lower earnings as loans and bonds mature and must be refinanced.
Investors should be especially careful with:
Profitable companies with strong balance sheets, durable pricing power and reliable cash generation should be better positioned if borrowing costs remain elevated.
Treasury yields also help establish the foundation for mortgage rates, auto loans, corporate borrowing and other forms of credit.
When long-term government yields rise, lenders generally demand higher rates from less creditworthy borrowers. The result can be more expensive mortgages, weaker housing demand and reduced consumer spending.
Higher borrowing costs can create pressure across several parts of the economy:
This is why the federal debt can affect Americans even if Congress never sends them a direct bill. The cost may arrive through higher interest rates, slower economic growth, reduced purchasing power or future tax increases.
Inflation can reduce the real value of fixed-rate government debt because Treasury repays bondholders with dollars worth less than when the money was borrowed.
That does not mean inflation is an easy solution.
Bond investors understand this risk. If they believe inflation will remain higher, they demand higher yields to compensate. Those yields raise the government’s interest costs and can erase some of the apparent fiscal benefit.
Persistent inflation would also hurt households—particularly retirees living on fixed incomes and investors holding excessive amounts of cash or low-yielding fixed-rate bonds.
The Federal Reserve therefore faces an increasingly difficult balancing act.
Keeping interest rates high helps fight inflation but increases government borrowing costs and can weaken interest-sensitive areas of the economy. Cutting rates too aggressively could reduce near-term debt-service pressure but risk reigniting inflation and undermining confidence in long-term Treasury securities.
Investors should not assume the Federal Reserve can solve a fiscal problem created by persistent federal deficits. Monetary policy can influence financing conditions. It cannot permanently reconcile the gap between government spending and revenue.
Crossing $40 trillion does not mean a financial collapse is necessarily around the corner.
The United States still possesses enormous advantages. The dollar remains the world’s primary reserve currency. Treasury securities are deeply embedded in global financial markets. America has a large, innovative economy and considerable taxing capacity.
But those strengths should not be mistaken for unlimited borrowing power.
A fiscal crisis does not always begin with a formal default. It can emerge gradually through:
The critical issue is investor confidence. As long as buyers believe the United States will maintain stable institutions, control inflation and ultimately manage its finances, Treasury can continue borrowing on relatively favorable terms.
If that confidence erodes, the government may have to offer substantially higher yields. Because the debt stock is already enormous, even a modest long-term increase in the average interest rate could add hundreds of billions of dollars to annual federal expenses.
Investors should avoid making dramatic portfolio changes based on a single debt milestone. The national debt has been rising for decades, and betting against the entire U.S. economy has historically been a poor long-term strategy.
However, the changing fiscal environment supports several prudent defensive moves.
Long-duration bonds can suffer substantial price declines when yields rise. Investors who may need access to their money should understand the maturity and interest-rate sensitivity of their bond holdings.
A ladder of short- and intermediate-term Treasury securities may provide more flexibility than placing all fixed-income assets into long-term bonds.
Companies with manageable debt, strong free cash flow and consistent profitability are generally better equipped to handle higher financing costs.
Balance-sheet quality becomes more valuable when capital is expensive.
Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, selected commodities, infrastructure assets and companies with genuine pricing power may help reduce the damage from persistent inflation.
Gold and Bitcoin may also attract interest during periods of fiscal concern, but both can be volatile and should not be treated as guaranteed hedges.
Investors should be cautious about constructing a portfolio that only succeeds if the Federal Reserve rapidly cuts rates.
Inflation, federal borrowing and Treasury supply could keep long-term yields elevated even if the Fed lowers short-term rates.
Fiscal uncertainty can produce sharp market swings. Holding an appropriate cash reserve can prevent investors from selling quality assets during a downturn and create buying power when valuations become more attractive.
The 10-year and 30-year Treasury yields may provide more useful fiscal warning signals than the federal funds rate.
Investors should pay attention to Treasury auctions, foreign demand, term premiums and the relationship between short- and long-term yields.
The United States crossing $40 trillion in debt is not merely another large number for Washington to ignore.
It represents a structural challenge that is already influencing interest rates, government spending and financial markets. America’s debt has more than doubled in approximately a decade, while annual interest expenses have climbed above $1 trillion and the federal deficit remains close to $2 trillion.
The country is not destined for an immediate debt collapse. It still has the world’s most important currency, one of its deepest capital markets and an economy capable of generating enormous wealth.
But those advantages do not eliminate the cost of fiscal indiscipline.
For investors, the prudent response is not panic. It is preparation: favor quality, understand interest-rate risk, maintain diversification and recognize that the era of nearly free government borrowing may be over.
The $40 trillion milestone is a warning that America’s fiscal problem is moving out of Washington’s accounting books and into household borrowing costs, bond portfolios, stock valuations and retirement plans.
Investors who adjust before the pressure becomes a full-blown crisis may be in a far stronger position than those who assume the debt will never matter.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
This doesn’t include the SS debt bomb, states, public pensions, or consumer debt. We are headed for hyperinflation to the days of the Weimar Republic. This is the perfect storm for the DSA.
Ruh roh, Shaggy.
RE: This is the perfect storm for the DSA.
OK, how is voting for them going to solve the problem?
MILLIONS & MILLIONS OF ILLEGALS ARE LIVING OFF OUR DIMES & DOLLARS
Rely on stronger inflation to reduce the real value of existing debt.
Don’t forget the NSP. That was the result of the financial collapse in Germany.
I like how this becomes So relevant just over 60 Days from the Midterm Election. It’s all I have heard about All Day.
In other words, given that an allegation, if not determination, as already to an extent has been made by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence that there has indeed been an insurrection/rebellion against the United States, led in part by persons such as "Barry," AKA Barrack H. Obama II, John O. Brennan, James Corney, James Clapper, Anthony Fauci, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland, Jack Smith, James E. Boasberg, Nancy Pelosi, etc., etc., (notably a dramatic preponderance of Democrats), a significant portion of that now-$40T+ debt has been incurred as a direct consequence of and to suppress said on-going rebellious insurrection, it does not properly fall to the US taxpayer to repay such debt.
"All such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void."
A powerful case can reasonably be made that the roots of said rebellion reach back at least to 1912, if not 1871, and that many foreigners and foreign powers have been involved in the years since.
The debt is significantly lower than this.
Most of the debt was created during the rebellion against our country; this part of the debt is nullified by the Insurrection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
STOP paying illegals. They would leave if we stopped paying them.
“””America has therefore added more than $20 trillion to its debt burden in approximately ten years. It took the country more than two centuries to accumulate its first $20 trillion”””
And how many manmade global viral pandemics were created in the first two centuries?
Warsh is selling bonds instead of buying them, thus he is competing with the Treasury, which also is selling bonds….so the price goes down and the yield goes up. Fed bought bonds for most of the Obama presidency and had interest rates at 0% for 8 years, the Fed monetized all that massive Blue State Covid debt, then continued to buy bonds under Biden to keep interest rates artificially low. That is what I see.
You have 2 divided political parties being pulled apart in opposite directions by their own partisan press. Trump won in 2016 by claiming the middle, but he has gone almost Mitt Romney/Paul Ryan Tea Party loser, with the Democrat Socialist of America being Democrat version of the Tea Party, history repeated as farce. There is not a lot of support for spending cuts or tax increases, but if GOP does not address the deficit problem, voters might see Democrats as worth a try, like they did in 1992 , in 2006, 2008, 2012,2018,2020,2022,2024.
Trump forgot all his 2016 campaign promises, or the fact that he wanted a “ net worth tax” on the rich to balance the budget in the 1990s when both parties had it as a goal. Price of gasoline that was $1.11 in 1981, $1.07 in 1993, fell below 90 cents in 1998 when Federal budget began to run a surplus, and Fed chairman worried about “ irrational exuberance” in the stock market, following his interest rate cut as response to falling oil price. The American people had been told that balancing the budget would drive down inflation and interest rates, so voters and investors were rationally exuberant when they saw prices falling, interest rates being cut, tax cuts on the horizon after the national debt was paid off. Why wouldn’t people be exuberant? What was irrational, was the Greenspan Fed raising rates into 5% growth, zero inflation to slow down the economy, starve the engine of fuel, hoping to get long term rates to rise during inflation, hoping rate hike could get us to 3% growth, 2% inflation by slamming the brakes of a car cruising to paradise.
Greenspan destroyed the country and the Fed crashed the economy for no reason in 1981, 1990, 2001,2008,2010…… proving the 1977 dual mandate law was a complete failure. The law was a mandate for the Fed to prevent recessions, and not worry so much about inflation that it caused recession, but it also was supposed to give price stability—— gas price falling in the 1990s, then doubling after 2002, then doubling again after 2008 proves the Fed failed both sides of its mandate….because the 1977 law is a bad law that was written by liberal Democrat big government socialists and it should be changed and replaced by a different law. A recession now would be a disaster. ..leading to even bigger deficits and more inflation, then a crash. I think the Fed should be mandated to put its Funds rate at the CPI or PPI, whichever is higher. The Fed should not get to hold its Funds rate at 0% like it did under Obama when consumer inflation was over 3.5% but producer inflation was almost 8%…… or raise its Funds rate to more than double the inflation rate, like Greenspan did at the end of the 1980s and 1990s.
A lot of the fiscal mess is tied to recession, inflation, interest rates and the Fed under the dual mandate law—- and Covid.
I’m racking up my part.
Obamacare was an expensive new entitlement created at the worst of all possible times, with the Democrat party wanting to create about ten new entitlements we cannot afford and will make matters worse.
1970s Democrats crashed the supply side of the economy with anti capitalist tax and regulatory policy, so they politicized the Federal Reserve with a dual mandate to print more money to prevent stagnation and recession, but only succeeded in ruining the demand side of the economy with double digit inflation. ..with the Fed powerless to get growth or bring down inflation without causing a depression that would go without end. ..because tax and regulations in the 1970s was much worse than in the 1930s.
No.
It won't, but in a crisis people ignorant of economics will be demanding "change" and won't know they are jumping out of the frying pan and into the fire. We should be privatizing the economy and reducing government spending, not centralizing it and putting corrupt and inefficient government planners in charge of our dollars.
One thing this article (which is excellent on the whole) doesn't say clearly: Don't buy or hold government debt. First, you are becoming part of the problem by enabling the bad behavior of big-government advocates. Second, you are going to get burned at some point.
A decade ago, total federal debt stood near $19.4 trillion. America has therefore added more than $20 trillion to its debt burden in approximately ten years. It took the country more than two centuries to accumulate its first $20 trillion—and roughly a decade to add the next $20 trillion.
It took over two centuries, from 1776 to 1982, for the country to accumulate $1T in debt. We passed the $1T mark under President Reagan.
President Trump added $7.8T in his first term, and has added $3.84T in his second term, equalling $11.64T total in slightly under six years. In eight years, Obama added $8.7T to the debt. Biden added $8.4T in four years.
The last time the annual figure for the debt was lower than the year before was in 1957, under Eisenhower.
The $1T mark was set in 1982.
9/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00
https://fiscaldata.treasury.gov/datasets/historical-debt-outstanding/historical-debt-outstanding
HISTORICAL DEBT:
1983 - the debt reached $1T. Reagan was President.
1957 - the last year the debt was less than the year before. Eisenhower was President.
9/30/2025 $37,637,553,494,935.61
9/30/2024 $35,464,673,929,171.69
9/30/2023 $33,167,334,044,723.16
9/30/2022 $30,928,911,613,306.73
9/30/2021 $28,428,918,570,048.68
9/30/2020 $26,945,391,194,615.15
9/30/2019 $22,719,401,753,433.78
9/30/2018 $21,516,058,183,180.23
9/30/2017 $20,244,900,016,053.51
9/30/2016 $19,573,444,713,936.79
9/30/2015 $18,150,617,666,484.33
9/30/2014 $17,824,071,380,733.82
9/30/2013 $16,738,183,526,697.32
9/30/2012 $16,066,241,407,385.89
9/30/2011 $14,790,340,328,557.15
9/30/2010 $13,561,623,030,891.79
9/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75
9/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49
9/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
9/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
9/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
9/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
9/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62
9/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
9/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06
9/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86
9/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43
9/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
9/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
9/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
9/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
9/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32
9/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38
9/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
9/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
9/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
9/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
9/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
9/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
9/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
9/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
9/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
9/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
9/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00
9/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
9/30/1980 $907,701,000,000.00
9/30/1979 $826,519,000,000.00
9/30/1978 $771,544,000,000.00
9/30/1977 $698,840,000,000.00
6/30/1976 $620,433,000,000.00
6/30/1975 $533,189,000,000.00
6/30/1974 $475,059,815,731.55
6/30/1973 $458,141,605,312.09
6/30/1972 $427,260,460,940.50
6/30/1971 $398,129,744,455.54
6/30/1970 $370,918,706,949.93
6/30/1969 $353,720,253,841.41
6/30/1968 $347,578,406,425.88
6/30/1967 $326,220,937,794.54
6/30/1966 $319,907,087,795.48
6/30/1965 $317,273,898,983.64
6/30/1964 $311,712,899,257.30
6/30/1963 $305,859,632,996.41
6/30/1962 $298,200,822,720.87
6/30/1961 $288,970,938,610.05
6/30/1960 $286,330,760,848.37
6/30/1959 $284,705,907,078.22
6/30/1958 $276,343,217,745.81
6/30/1957 $270,527,171,896.43
6/30/1956 $272,750,813,649.32
6/30/1955 $274,374,222,802.62
6/30/1954 $271,259,599,108.46
6/30/1953 $266,071,061,638.57
6/30/1952 $259,105,178,785.43
6/29/1951 $255,221,976,814.93
6/30/1950 $257,357,352,351.04
6/30/1949 $252,770,359,860.33
6/30/1948 $252,292,246,512.99
6/30/1947 $258,286,383,108.67
6/28/1946 $269,422,099,173.26
6/30/1945 $258,682,187,409.93
How could Biden let this happen?
Love the culture war bullshit; it’s not immigrants, It’s not ObamaCare, it’s tax cuts for billionaires. It’s new endless wars.
What did you get?
DOGE promises?
Want to fix social Security, make the SS tax everyone the same; they pay into it on their entire salary.
Allowing people who make millions to not have to fund SS is serious bullshit while I get taxed 100% on my salary.
People simping for billionaires is insane. They don’t care about you and neither does Trump.
Do you mean the "N.S.D.A.P.?"
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.