Posted on 07/25/2026 6:52:27 AM PDT by MinorityRepublican
Iran has been accused of smuggling spies into the UK disguised as small boat migrants crossing the English Channel.
UK authorities are said to have discovered individuals linked to Tehran's intelligence agencies among asylum seekers arriving in Britain by using face recognition technology fitted to drones and surveillance watchtowers.
It is also understood that the routes used to traffic migrants are operated and 'owned' by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
The Daily Mail reported in March how asylum seekers ostensibly fleeing the war in Iran had arrived in France to cross the Channel to the UK.
Dozens were said to have arrived in vans at the Loon-Plage migrant camp in Dunkirk after travelling from Iran via Turkey.
Oxford University's migration observatory has said that Iranians were the most common nationality among asylum seekers to the UK over the past decade.
But it was also through these routes that the Iranian state had managed to position 'revolutionary people' in London ready to act on behalf of the state.
The revelation comes as it emerged more than 500 small-boat migrants arrived during Andy Burnham's first week as Prime Minister.
Sources said one dinghy was a staggering 12m long and carried 165, with the six vessels crossing the Channel in total this week branded 'Burnham's boats'.
More migrants were spotted in the Channel on Wednesday, meaning the tally was closer to around 600.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.com ...
...aaaaand, THIS SH!T is why you control your borders, retards.
Then giving them bank accounts of cash and free hotels so they can concentrate ion their terror attacks and not worry about working
Comeon man. Do you really believe that the IRGC is just now doing this?
No, surely not they wouldn’t do that.
I'm sure Soros and commie thugs were flying foreign intelligence and men of military age "near" our borders disguised as 'illegals' wanting to 'be free' and pick our crops. Press bimbos and pretentious idiot editors 'missed' the obvious since their news packets are prepared with 'help' from some of the above 'sources' and since they're stupid.
"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries, improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement, the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome."
Winston Churchill
The cheek!
Wonder how many Farsi-speaking “Juan Valdezs” SloJo let into the US.
Anyone think the British government cares? Just send more illegals.
How the Mighty have fallen (2 Samuel 29, 25, 27),
Great Britain’s Royal navy once ruled the seas of the entire world
Now it can’t (or won’t) even interdict little rubber dingies right offshore in the English Channel
IIRC....part of a speech made in Missouri.
Iran beyond all doubt, even has folks here in the US. You can count on it.
They have been trying to spread their wings and developed their capabilities over many years.
1989 in Vienna: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abdul_Rahman_Ghassemlou
Budget and certain enabling technologies, holds them back on much of the advanced weaponry.
But in the human domain, developing or even having sleepers in the West has been TOTALLY within their capabilities for many years.
1. I am sure this is an incomplete list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Iranian_assassinations
2. Iran probably could do more than they are right now (in that domain of warfare). But when you unleash this capability, you burn it up. It takes a long time and is very difficult to get people in the right places, or recruit them, funnel supplies to them, train them, devise communications channels (how they are often detected) etc. You hold this back for when you really-really want to use it - because it’s kind of a one shot deal.
No photo perhaps better sums up the state of modern Britain than this one.
This is in the news now.
For obvious reasons.
But this threat developed over many years in the past.
You can almost count on the fact that Iran has folks in places which they see as influential/important and threats to them.
It’s not always someone that is going to try to shoot at a politician or blow something up.
Most of the time, all these folks do is take pictures of aircraft and ships as they come and go, keep track of where tankers are parked, special purpose aircraft, special units, etc.
In some cases all they do is count, for example where F35s are built. They all get a test flight (functional test) in FW and China sure would like to know real numbers that they count, not which they read in the Internet. In a case like that you don’t want someone hanging on our fence all day, that’s sort of obvious. What you do, is you have someone own a store or buy a home that is positioned well to observe.
Does he get the white woman after they make it to land?
Yep! Whether she wants it or not.
The white woman will later complain that she no longer feels safe going out at night because "men have forgotten how to behave themselves."
Trolling for orcas?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.