Posted on 07/13/2026 9:13:55 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
The Supreme Court dealt a setback to President Trump at the end of June when they ruled that so-called “birthright citizenship” was enshrined by the 14th Amendment and that children born in the United States to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present are citizens at birth under the 14th Amendment.
The Court, in Trump v. Barbara, rejected Trump’s executive order banning the practice 6-3, although only five justices held that the order violated the 14th Amendment. Justice Brett Kavanaugh supplied the sixth vote on narrower statutory grounds.
As we’ve written, the Department of Justice immediately launched a crackdown on birth tourism, where scammers sneak into the country or overstay their visas to make sure their babies are born here and win the prize of citizenship for their offspring.
Now, Sen. Jim Banks (R-IN) is taking a page from SCOTUS Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s playbook and introducing legislation that attempts to capitalize on Kavanaugh’s separate — and noncontrolling — view that Congress may create additional exceptions by statute:
Sen. Jim Banks will introduce legislation Monday aimed at ending birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants and birth tourists by defining them as children of "invaders" under federal law after a Supreme Court ruling last month dealt a setback to President Donald Trump’s executive order on the issue.
Trump recently urged Senate Republicans to move faster on his legislative agenda, including ending birthright citizenship, telling them they were "not fighting hard enough," Banks, R-Ind., recalled in a June 30 interview with Human Events.
Banks told Fox News Digital he plans to introduce the Citizenship Act as soon as the Senate opens for business Monday afternoon – crafting it with a nod to Trump-appointed Justice Brett Kavanaugh’s concurrence in last month's Trump v. Barbara case.
👀That was fast. @SenatorBanks read Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence in the Birthright Citizenship case closely. The Supreme Court's Wong Kim Ark said 3 categories of people don't get citizenship. One is children of invaders. So he's introducing a law labeling illegals invaders pic.twitter.com/zXUizLqG8K— Eric W. (@EWess92) July 13, 2026
MORE: It's Not Over: DOJ Launches Major Crackdown After Supreme Court's Birthright Citizenship Ruling
Supreme Court Upholds Birthright Citizenship, Strikes Down Trump Executive Order in 5-4 Vote
Banks had previously previewed his move in a social media post by highlighting his priorities, including passing the SAVE America Act, which would require proof of citizenship to vote and photo ID to submit a ballot:
Last week's Supreme Court decision on birthright citizenship highlights the need for 4 important next steps:
1 – Deport every illegal alien out of America
2 – Maintain the Supreme Court majority
3 – Pass the SAVE America Act
4 – Pass a bill to ban birthright citizenship… pic.twitter.com/VlCZQs8Q2N— Senator Jim Banks (@SenatorBanks) July 11, 2026
Kavanaugh, who voted with the majority to strike down Trump’s executive order on birthright citizenship but dissented on whether the order violated the Constitution/14th Amendment, offered Banks a possible statutory theory — though not one adopted by the Court. While Kavanaugh concluded that Congress could amend federal law to create additional exceptions to birthright citizenship, the five-justice majority held that the 14th Amendment itself guarantees citizenship to children born here to parents who are unlawfully or temporarily present. Banks’ bill would therefore tee up a fresh constitutional fight rather than neatly sidestep the Court’s ruling.
Kavanaugh, concurring in the judgment and dissenting in part, said Trump’s order conflicted with federal birthright citizenship law but suggested Congress could amend that statute to create new exceptions.
In its summary, Banks' bill declares "any person who enters the United States without authorization or for the purpose of engaging in birth tourism is considered an invader..." and amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to exclude children of such "invaders."
Banks' key use of "invaders" cites Trump’s executive order declaring illegal immigration across the southern border an "invasion," while the bill notes the Barbara decision leaves that avenue open for Congress to crack down on.
The law would codify Trump’s declaration of "invasion" and potentially block birthright citizenship being automatically handed out to children of illegal immigrants.
The Supreme Court’s decision was a blow to Trump’s agenda, but it was a battle, not the end of the war. Thanks to Kavanaugh, a solution to one of the Left’s endless efforts to make a mockery out of our immigration system could be in sight. Whether Banks has found a viable workaround or simply set up the next Supreme Court fight remains to be seen.
Dear FRiends,
We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.
If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:
Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you,
Jim
Expect Thune to table it forever.
Thune will kill it. Thune kills everything we need. Why?
Sadly, yes. They don’t have the guts to do it. Even though it is a Congressional power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 and Section 5 of the 14th Amendment.
Even if Kavanaugh gave a map where he thinks it could work, there are still 5 Justices who will say the 14th Amendment provisions on birth citizenship are a Constitutional protection that cannot be removed through legislation.
They’ll require an amendment to change it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.