Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Meese and the Originalist Court
The Wall Street Journal ^ | June 30, 2026 3:15 pm ET | James Taranto

Posted on 07/02/2026 3:09:00 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

In the 1980s, he started a movement to restore the Constitution to judging. It has come a long way.

McLean, Va.

Edwin Meese III, 94, has outlived Humphrey’s Executor v. U.S. On Monday the Supreme Court overruled that 91-year-old decision and held in Trump v. Slaughter that the president has the authority to fire a member of the Federal Trade Commission and senior officials from other “independent” executive-branch agencies.

Slaughter is the latest in a string of recent high-court decisions overturning or correcting bad precedents, usually by 6-3 votes—among them Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), Chevron v. NRDC (1984), Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and of course the big ones, Roe v. Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992).

In the 2020s, the end of June, when the justices announce most of their highest-profile decisions, has become a celebratory season for American conservatives. Mr. Meese deserves more credit than perhaps any other single person for the 40-year transformation of the high court from a body that sought to “remold principles in light of policies” into one that is generally faithful to the Constitution.

The quotation is from an address Mr. Meese delivered to the American Bar Association on July 9, 1985, a few months after he took office as Ronald Reagan’s attorney general. It made the case for a “Jurisprudence of Original Intention” and provoked a denunciation from Justice William Brennan, who called originalism “arrogance cloaked as humility,” as well as a more lawyerly rebuttal from Justice John Paul Stevens.

Its ideas have informed the judicial...


(Excerpt) Read more at wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: edmeese; meese

1 posted on 07/02/2026 3:09:00 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Had no idea Ed Meese was still alive.


2 posted on 07/02/2026 3:34:11 PM PDT by mgstarr ("I drink, therefore I am" Rene Descartes (1637))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgstarr

Had no idea Ed Meese was still alive.


It appears we owe him a great deal. Progressives controlled the Supreme Court for 60 years. Then we had a mixed court.

Today we have an originalist and textualist court.


3 posted on 07/02/2026 3:36:58 PM PDT by marktwain (----------------------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Bookmark


4 posted on 07/02/2026 3:38:24 PM PDT by Mark (DONATE ONCE every 3 months-is that a big deal?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Meese absolutely deserves massive credit for helping to save this country’s jurisprudence. Incredibly influential in terms of helping to create a generation of conservative lawyers who have had a hell of a lot more success than anyone would ever have thought possible back in the 70’s/80’s.


5 posted on 07/02/2026 3:38:56 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Don’t grow numb with winning.


6 posted on 07/02/2026 4:03:19 PM PDT by Jacquerie (ArticleVBlog.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Meese is the GOAT.

Glad to see him still living. He is a genuine living legend.


7 posted on 07/02/2026 9:56:08 PM PDT by ProgressingAmerica (The U.S. Constitution is not a suicide pact. Progressivism is a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

That is totally cool to hear he is still alive and helping.


8 posted on 07/02/2026 10:22:07 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

“Justice William Brennan, who called originalism “arrogance cloaked as humility,”
Brennan should have seen his destructive ideology as UNcloaked arrogance of activism.
If Constitutional originalism is not supported then what the hell was the point of the revolution?


9 posted on 07/03/2026 6:59:21 AM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson