Posted on 06/14/2026 5:38:59 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
A federal judge in Massachusetts has ordered the Trump administration to restore all signs that were changed or removed at national parks across the country as part of President Donald Trump’s controversial directive last year.
In a scathing 63-page ruling on Friday, Judge Angel Kelley wrote, “Under the guise of promoting American dignity, this Administration seeks to share a limited history by ordering the removal of all signs, displays, and interpretive exhibits at National Parks that do not align with its preferred narrative, thereby telling half-truths.”
Kelley, an appointee of President Joe Biden, ordered that the restoration be complete by July 3, ahead of the nation’s 250th birthday. In the ruling, she also blocked the Trump administration from making any further changes to exhibits at national parks.
In a statement on Saturday, an Interior Department spokesperson called Kelley “a liberal activist judge” and suggested that the department could appeal the ruling.
“The Department will look at our appeal options while we celebrate UFC Freedom 250 on the South Lawn of the White House this weekend in honor of our nation’s 250th with the greatest president in the history of our country - President Donald J. Trump,” the statement read.
Friday’s ruling comes as part of a lawsuit filed by coalition of conservationists and advocates in February against the Interior Department and the National Park Service that accused the administration of “mounting a sustained campaign to erase history and undermine science.”
.....
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Uh, yeah, I think we should ignore and carry on.
SCOTUS is comatose most of the year. Maybe one of them might deign to poke his head up
out of his hidey-hole at some point in the distant future. By then the damage is done.
,
It’s time to start removing these judges from the bench.
Where’s that in the Constitution?
Judge Angel. From Massachusetts.
No standing. That belongs to the Executive Branch.
Is Angel Black?
Removing with extreme prejudice.
Anyone remember an example of these terrible changes?
What is a half-truth to a Communist?
Ditto
Which, of course, only encourages the left to engage in more of it.
“Is Angel Black?”
From an online photo accompanying her bio. it appears she may be mixed race, with some black in the mixture.
I would say YES - possibly mixed race...fairly plump from the only pic I could find...couldn’t copy/paste for some reason.
1. Whose preferred narrative?
2. What law was broken that required intervention?
Since I had already given them a hit, here’s one example listed:
“At South Carolina’s Fort Sumter National Monument, a sign that included details on the looming impacts of climate change, including information on how “rising seas could inundate most of the fort’s walls and flood the historic parade ground” was removed in its entirety.”
I believe the USSC has already ruled that a Federal Judge can NOT go beyond his own district.
This may help - didn’t read it all - may find something more condensed than this...
I would ignore this judge. She has no jurisdiction over what signs are posted in parks nationally.
Perhaps ignoring this idiotic nonsense for once, is the only way to stop it.
We have gotten nowhere by playing these games they foist upon us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.