Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/29/2026 1:25:05 PM PDT by Ultra Sonic 007
(In the first step towards shifting aid further into the shadows, the House's 2027 NDAA would all but fuse the two countries' armed forces together)
At a time when the American public is expressing unprecedented levels of distrust in the Israeli government, Congress just proposed tying the U.S. to the Israeli military more than ever before.
Buried in the House's version of the 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) released on Tuesday, is section 224, entitled “United States-Israel Defense Technology Cooperation Initiative.” The provision would arguably do more to intertwine the U.S. military with the Israeli military than the more than $200 billion (inflation adjusted) in military assistance Israel has received from the U.S. since its founding in 1948.
Section 224 lays the groundwork for bilateral research and development, co-production of weapons, joint ventures, licensing agreements, and seemingly every manner of U.S.-Israeli military-industrial complex cooperation. The U.S. and Israel already work together heavily on missile defense, but this provision would greatly expand coordination to seemingly every area of defense tech, including AI, quantum, autonomous systems, directed energy, cyber, biotech, and many more. It also proposes “network integration” and “data fusion.” In other words, the U.S. military’s data could soon be the Israeli military’s data.
If fully enacted, this proposal would provide a higher level of military-industrial integration than the U.S. has with any other country in the world. To be sure, the U.S. has worked closely with its NATO partners on co-production and shared supply chains, most notably via the Defence Production Action Plan. And, as the number one arms dealer in the world, the U.S. provides weapons to militaries across the globe. But that is mostly a one-way street, with the U.S. providing weapons to foreign buyers who only occasionally make parts for those weapons themselves, as in the case of the F-35’s global supply chain.
Section 224 would be a different beast entirely. It would fuse the U.S. and Israeli defense sectors in multiple areas vital to the battlefields of the future, like autonomous systems and cyber. It would also bring extraordinary Israeli influence to the U.S. beyond what it already has through the Israel lobby and its robust network of social media influencers. It would give the Israeli government the opportunity to greatly expand one of the most powerful levers of influence in U.S. politics: jobs in the U.S. By expanding or starting new co-production facilities like it already has in Mississippi and Arkansas, the Israeli government could boast of providing jobs on U.S. soil, thereby securing allies among members of Congress who represent the districts where those jobs lie.
The result could well be a U.S. political system even more susceptible to the whims of an Israeli government that seemingly has no qualms about drawing the U.S. into military conflicts in the Middle East.
This unprecedented level of U.S.-Israeli military integration stands in stark contrast to the traditional aid model of defense cooperation, in which Israel already stood out as the top recipient of U.S. military assistance. As laid out in a recent Quincy Institute brief, authored by Steven Simon, this shift from an aid model to a military integration model has troubling implications, namely: "The shift will strip away the political and diplomatic oversight mechanisms that make the relationship publicly accountable, moving it from a visible annual aid vote into the opaque machinery of defense acquisition, where oversight is limited and political accountability is minimal. The result would be a defense relationship that is simultaneously deeper and less transparent."
This all comes at a time when the Israeli military has repeatedly used U.S. weapons in strikes that have violated international humanitarian laws in Gaza, and as Israel has repeatedly violated ceasefires (as has the U.S. itself) in the Trump administration’s unnecessary war with Iran.
The enormous gulf between what most Americans want and what the president is doing when it comes to Israel and what Congress is proposing here should not be ignored. Just 30% of respondents to a New York Times/Sienna poll from mid-May believe Trump made “the right decision” to go to war with Iran, with 64% saying it was wrong. An Institute for Global Affairs poll released earlier this week dove even deeper into the American psyche when it comes to arming Israel, finding that “Just 16 percent say the United States should keep supplying Israel with weapons without new restrictions. Thirty-eight percent want to stop supplying weapons entirely, and another 24 percent want weapons conditioned on how they’re used.”
Yet, mainstream leadership in both parties remains largely pro-Israel and continues to shape the base legislative text before amendments and broader congressional debate open it to the full body, as is the case with this NDAA provision.
Though slowly, tides within both parties are shifting as more and more members speak out against the growing divide between Israel’s actions and America’s interests. For example, Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) wrote in The New York Times on Tuesday that, “The Democratic Party has provided reflexive and unconditional support to Israeli governments, even as their actions have increasingly undermined American interests and values.” On the Republican side of the aisle, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green (R-Ga.) have openly decried the Israel lobby’s corrosive influence — a stance that may have, at least partially, cost both of them their seats in Congress.
What can other members of Congress who are concerned about Israel’s destabilizing actions do right now? Stop the Israeli-U.S. military-industrial merger in its tracks. Lawmakers should reject Section 224 from the NDAA to avoid deep integration with Israel's military at a time when a growing number of Americans oppose Israel's actions in the region.
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
POTUS Netanyahu told them to.
Our country has been totally taken over by Zionists. It’s well past time we start weeding out all Zionists in our government and take back our country. Congress has become unbelievably corrupt at this point.
You sure it wasn’t Rabbi Trump? 😜
Oooooh, those wascawwy Zionwists.
My grandchildren will not fight for zionism..
If true, I think it’s a smart move.
A fusion between Israeli and US military tech, will make both countries much stronger. There are many highly skilled engineers and scientists in Israel.
LOL. Yeah sure.
Thank you, Nick Fuentes. Don’t you have a cross to burn or a Jewish....I’m sorry....Jooish bakery to burn down?
Yeah. Sure, Ilhan.
Israeli scientists and engineers can move here.
I have nothing against Israel or Jews, just don’t think they are entirely our responsibility.
I posted a few days ago re: why there should be a US military base in Israel - instead of having bases in the Gulf States and Europe.
It would act as a deterrence to Oct 7th ordeals. (Netanyahu’s failure by the way.) That’s the main reason.
And theoretically, it would restrain Israel too. Especially preemptive aggression.
“A permanent base would allow the US to refuse to authorize Israeli military operations that might put US assets in jeopardy and thereby hamper Israel’s tendency to use excessive force.” (commenter Joseph Kaufman noted.)
The case for a permanent US base in Israel
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/the-case-for-a-permanent-u-s-base-in-israel/
U.S. Bases in Israel Will Deter the Next October 7
https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/u-s-bases-in-israel-will-deter-the-next-october-7/
I just had a quick look at the “Responsible Statecraft” website. One or two anti-Israel articles…well, that’s okay. But, nope. The site is filled with them.
So I don’t think these folks are particularly neutral in their reporting.
You’re stranded on a desert island. Two rescue boats show up. One takes you to Madmani’s New York, the other takes you to Netanyahu’s Israel. Which one do you jump onto?
Netenyahu wants to white out Iran. President Trump has been holding him back. He is the President. We tell Israel what to do.
Madmani’s New York. Israel is on it’s last legs thanks to Netanyahu.
New York, because I'm an American citizen, not an Israeli citizen.
I don't have to worry about a passport, so I can just leave New York and go home. I wouldn't have that option in Israel.
Try paying attention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.