Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' could carry a big tax bill, some experts argue
Politico ^ | 05/28/2026 10:00 AM EDT | Bernie Becker

Posted on 05/28/2026 12:44:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

Federal income tax experts tell POLITICO money from the DOJ's Judgment Fund, which the new $1.8 billion program is drawing on, is generally taxable.

President Donald Trump isn’t supposed to directly profit from the dismissal of his lawsuit against the IRS.

And yet, he could still owe taxes on the money going to set up a central feature of that deal — the $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund.”

Some tax practitioners say the way that the fund, which Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced May 18, is structured likely makes it an income tax liability for the president, potentially costing hundreds of millions of dollars.

The argument stems from the fact the Trump administration is setting up its new “anti-weaponization” initiative through the Treasury Department’s Judgment Fund, which Congress set up decades ago to automatically pay federal court settlements.

Payments from the fund can only be made to actual litigants, and proceeds from legal settlements generally are taxable, with an exception for compensation for medical injuries or sickness.

Senior administration officials and critics alike have said this is a particularly unusual use of the Judgment Fund, with little to no precedent for how the money setting up the “anti-weaponization” pool might be taxed. The White...


(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: berniebecker; johnthune; leftistsource; politico; pollutico; southdakota

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.

However will we fund the tens of billions of dollars of Democrat fraud (which Pollutico has studiously ignored) if we compensate the political prisoners of January 6th?

https://x.com/i/grok/share/26d909403f14486db78c4e4f44bb45a8

1 posted on 05/28/2026 12:44:05 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hopefully a lot of it will come back in hefty fines and prison time for the individuals who caused this crime against the constitution, the nation, and these people. I can’t think of anyone I’d rather pull the trapdoor on.


2 posted on 05/28/2026 1:04:51 PM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Why not use Roth IRAs and tax-free Municipal Bonds like the Kennedy Klan?


3 posted on 05/28/2026 1:45:11 PM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus III (Do, or do not, there is no try. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryderann

I want all the monies and organs from people who did this wrong, to be given to deserving people who will still be living.


4 posted on 05/28/2026 1:50:06 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I’m not so sure I agree with the Politico “analysts” but it does make a nice “clickbait” headline and probably makes the commies feel good about themselves.

Trump, as I see it, receives absolutely nothing of value from this settlement. He also doesn’t appear to have any control over the funds. Those factors, assuming they are correct, mean that he doesn’t have any income from the fund.

As far as any recipients go, payments they receive are most likely to be considered compensatory damages rather than punitive damages and, as such, would not be taxable.

I’m not sure if Professor Zelenak has ever prepared a tax return before or represented anyone before the IRS but it sure looks to me like he would be the LAST person I’d go to for tax advice and, for his students, my heart just goes out to them for shelling out Duke tuition for this kind of junk.


5 posted on 05/28/2026 2:02:20 PM PDT by Tucsonican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Now they are worried about tax bills after 37 trillion and learing center shit FO


6 posted on 05/28/2026 2:05:08 PM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tucsonican

CA has already stated they intend to tax them 100%.


7 posted on 05/28/2026 2:10:09 PM PDT by packrat35 (“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

But paying off BLM rioters is ALL GOOD right..or how about giving reparations to blacks who were NEVER slaves


8 posted on 05/28/2026 2:33:51 PM PDT by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

It’s a court award, not a game show prize.


9 posted on 05/28/2026 3:06:21 PM PDT by MikelTackNailer (Don't confuse me with the facts; I have an agenda to grind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

They are woried about taxes now lol


10 posted on 05/28/2026 3:46:36 PM PDT by italianquaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson