Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

State worker union tries novel legal angle to stop Newsom’s return-to-office order
Sacramento Bee ^ | May 28, 2026 | William Melhado

Posted on 05/28/2026 7:45:19 AM PDT by artichokegrower

A state worker union hopes to use a California environmental law notorious for obstructing the construction of new homes to block a very different kind of project: Gov. Gavin Newsom’s impending return-to-office order. On Wednesday, the union representing state attorneys and administrative law judges sent “exhaustion” letters to over 100 state departments, arguing that the return-to-office order will require more than 90,000 state workers to commute four days a week, which will negatively impact California’s environment.

(Excerpt) Read more at sacbee.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; demagogicparty; democratcorruption; democratincompetence; gavinnewsom; higspeedrail; sociopath
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
You worthless pampered parasites on society. Won’t go back to work for four days a week. You get 13 paid holidays two weeks paid vacation to start get early retirement at full pension for working “overtime “. We farmers don’t want to drive out to the farm, doctors don’t want to drive over to the hospital, retail employees don’t want to go to the store. You guys figure it out and quit suing the California taxpayer
1 posted on 05/28/2026 7:45:19 AM PDT by artichokegrower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Good.

With gas over $6.00/gallon in California, maybe they’ll think twice about WHO they voted for.


2 posted on 05/28/2026 7:47:15 AM PDT by Bon of Babble (You Say You Want a Revolution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

State government employees, as in parasites.


3 posted on 05/28/2026 7:48:45 AM PDT by ComputerGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

If they can work from home, their jobs should not be locked to California people only.


4 posted on 05/28/2026 7:50:45 AM PDT by pas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

gotta admit the Cali state employees have a very creative lawyer, ha!

(while such a far-out claim reveals the attorney’s lack of any serious cause of action, it will give the judge a chuckle or two...smiles smiles)


5 posted on 05/28/2026 7:56:18 AM PDT by faithhopecharity ("Politicians aren't born, they're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero (106 to 43 BCE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pas

If they go on strike will anyone notice?

EC


6 posted on 05/28/2026 7:56:18 AM PDT by Ex-Con777 ("Journalism is about covering important stories-with a pillow, until they stop moving." ~ David Burg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

They won’t.


7 posted on 05/28/2026 7:58:17 AM PDT by dinodino ( Shut it down anyway. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Just another example why decent, hard working productive Americans are justified to resent paying taxes.


8 posted on 05/28/2026 8:06:11 AM PDT by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

‘Rat fight! video at 10!” Don’t you love trouble in our enemies’ tent?


9 posted on 05/28/2026 8:13:18 AM PDT by jmaroneps37 (Freedom is never free. It must be won rewon and jealously guarded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Fight for the right to “not” work from home and still draw full pay.

Work from home has been the most unproductive thing ever push on the workplace and the deadbeats are so addicted, they fight any attempt to make them work again.


10 posted on 05/28/2026 8:23:58 AM PDT by packrat35 (“When discourse ends, violence begins.” – Charlie Kirk, and they killed him anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy

Lawyers and judges don’t want to show up for work. All trying to qualify for seats in Congress.


11 posted on 05/28/2026 8:33:48 AM PDT by DPMD (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: packrat35
I retired at 50 at then end of 2019, but still do gig work in the Winters for one of my former clients - a Fortune 500. They had RTO a couple of years ago, but still had many remote workers who didn't, nor ever had, worked very close to any of the regional offices. They've been cutting all of them over the past two years, just in low enough number so as to evade the various WARN act requirements in the various states.

The inability or difficulty involved to fire government workers is a bane on the taxpayer.

12 posted on 05/28/2026 8:33:59 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: packrat35

Fight for the right to “not” work from home and still draw full pay.


Well, if Congress can do it...


13 posted on 05/28/2026 8:34:51 AM PDT by DPMD (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Avg Calif state employee $143,000


14 posted on 05/28/2026 8:48:09 AM PDT by Jolla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

Order?


15 posted on 05/28/2026 9:21:22 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I’ll take “How to fund the CA state government at 61.2 cents per gallon”, Alex...


16 posted on 05/28/2026 9:23:14 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pas

That could be interesting:

“The good news is, you can work from home. The bad news is, you’re all fired and will need to re-apply for your jobs, because we are now looking at virtual workers anywhere in the country. (Or world).

Now you sure you don’t want to drive into the office?”


17 posted on 05/28/2026 9:28:46 AM PDT by bigbob (We are all Charlie Kirk now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

No, they won’t.


18 posted on 05/28/2026 9:37:30 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: artichokegrower

I find this an excellent use of Alinsky’s rules.

I am all for this, in California.


19 posted on 05/28/2026 9:37:52 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

“I retired at 50 at then end of 2019, but still do gig work in the Winters for one of my former clients - a Fortune 500. They had RTO a couple of years ago, but still had many remote workers who didn’t, nor ever had, worked very close to any of the regional offices. “

If they were hired remote and not given an incentive to live closer to glass tower in the sky, what exactly is the motivation to move towards an urban hell hole (or just 2 hours of commuting per day).

When we were given RTO instructions they were not return to the Jan 2020 status quo, they were to return to office spaces that had shrank by 40% despite the workforce growing by 30%. When 3 of the elevators to floors 30-45 went out of serive on the trial date of RTO, the employees all had certain words to the middle manangers who were told to enforce RTO.

As a IT infrastructure worker, the office is the place to sit around for the events on the weekends, that are completed 100% remote. The IT workers were doing 80 hours a week, weekdays full of pushing laptop applications and doing basic suitability testing for better part of 2 years after March 2020. The next 4 years has been catching up on upgrades that were pushed aside during 2020-2022, just now the schedule is such that 2 days of meetings once a month, lunches and power design sessions in the office is important again. Otherwise when America outsourced the industry it was proven it could be done remotely.


20 posted on 05/28/2026 9:43:29 AM PDT by protoconservative (Been Conservative Before You Were Born )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson