Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear Sabotage? Russian "Shadow" Ship Sunk by High-Tech Torpedo in Mediterranean
JFeed ^ | 12 May 2026 | Bianca Jones

Posted on 05/12/2026 7:54:55 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan

A Russian cargo vessel suspected of carrying components for two nuclear submarine reactors, possibly destined for North Korea, sank in the Mediterranean Sea under mysterious circumstances in December 2024, according to a CNN investigation published today.

The Ursa Major (also known as Sparta 3), a heavy-lift ship linked to Russia’s “shadow fleet” and previously used in military operations in Syria, went down approximately 60 miles (about 100 km) off the coast of Spain near Cartagena on December 23, 2024. The sinking followed a series of explosions that killed two crew members and left 14 others rescued by Spanish authorities.

Spanish investigators, citing statements from the ship’s captain, Igor Anisimov, determined the vessel was transporting “components for two nuclear reactors similar to those used in submarines.” The captain reportedly believed the cargo was headed for the North Korean port of Rason, amid deepening military cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang.

Evidence Points to Possible Torpedo Strike

A key piece of evidence is a roughly 50 cm by 50 cm (about 20 x 20 inches) hole in the hull with edges bent inward, consistent with an external impact. Spanish probes suggest this damage may have been caused by a rare Barracuda-type supercavitating torpedo, a high-speed weapon capable of punching through hulls using a bubble of air to reduce drag.

Only a small number of countries are known to possess this technology: the United States, several NATO allies, Russia, and Iran.

U.S. nuclear detection aircraft conducted flights over the site in the months following the incident, monitoring for possible radioactive material. No confirmed radiation leaks have been publicly reported.

Russian Response and Further Explosions

Russia’s state-linked owner, Oboronlogistics, described the initial explosions as a “targeted terrorist attack.” One week after the sinking, the Russian intelligence and research ship Yantar, often associated with underwater espionage, arrived at the wreck site. Seismic data recorded four additional powerful explosions during its presence in the area, possibly intended to destroy or obscure remaining wreckage on the seabed at a depth of about 2,500 meters.

The ship’s declared manifest listed innocuous items such as cranes and manhole covers, but its unusual route through the Mediterranean (instead of a more direct path) raised suspicions among investigators.

Broader Context

The incident occurs against the backdrop of Russia’s reported transfer of advanced military technology to North Korea in exchange for troops and munitions used in the war in Ukraine. Preventing the spread of sensitive nuclear propulsion technology has been a priority for Western intelligence agencies.

No country has claimed responsibility for any sabotage, and the full details remain under investigation. Experts continue to debate whether the damage resulted from a torpedo, a mine, or another cause.

The wreck lies in international waters, and recovering the voyage data recorder or any remaining cargo would require complex deep-sea operations.


TOPICS: News/Current Events; War
KEYWORDS: barracuda; biancajones; cartagena; cnn; goodriddance; igoranisimov; iran; mediterranean; niceshooting; northkorea; oboronlogistics; putinthewarpig; pyongyang; rason; russia; shadowfleet; spain; sparta3; supercavitating; syria; torpedo; ursamajor; worldwareleven; yantar

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.



The Russian-flagged boat Ursa Major was hit by a supercavitating torpedo on December 23, 2024 60 miles off the coast of Spain in the Mediterrean. It was carrying two submarine nuclear reactors.

Other articles:

https://militarnyi.com/en/news/ursa-major-north-korea-and-nuclear-reactors-new-details-on-russian-vessel-sinking/

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/us/who-sank-russian-cargo-ship-ursa-major-was-nato-involved-and-was-it-torpedoed-reports-explain-mystery-ships-route-nuclear-cargo-claims-and-us-aircraft-presence/articleshow/131037442.cms




1 posted on 05/12/2026 7:54:55 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Mediterranean Sea Swordfish can be dangerous during mating season


2 posted on 05/12/2026 7:59:36 AM PDT by butlerweave (Fateh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Idiots. They share a friggen border. Thank God they suck.


3 posted on 05/12/2026 8:02:31 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (There is no gravity. The earth just sucks. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

Apparently.

This was a pretty bold act of war on Russia, whoever did it.

I’m leaning to the Biden Admin, given the timing (Dec 2024), the willingness of Democrats to hand Trump a potential mess, the rarity of the torpedo, and the sudden, unexplained, presences of US nuclear “sniffer” planes.


4 posted on 05/12/2026 8:03:42 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LS; MeanWestTexan; Texan5; Red Badger; SunkenCiv; GOPJ; PJ-Comix; Libloather; MtnClimber; Liz

Oh. Nov 2024.
That was ordered attacked and sunk (by unknown US/UK torpedoes) DURING THE OBAMA-BIDEN-STEIMER REGIMES. Right?


5 posted on 05/12/2026 8:06:21 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

A lot of things can’t be shipped by rail, notably things with insulation. (The rattling of tracks breaks it.)

I’ve dealt with this with granite panels for a skyscraper.


6 posted on 05/12/2026 8:07:42 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Robert A Cook PE

December, but otherwise correct.


7 posted on 05/12/2026 8:08:35 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Gotcha. I still think going through the Med with this while a war is going on is the least best choice. Lol.


8 posted on 05/12/2026 8:12:32 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (There is no gravity. The earth just sucks. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Nuland and Sullivan are going to destroy the world.


9 posted on 05/12/2026 8:12:53 AM PDT by blackdog (The philosophy of the schoolroom in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

Note this was December 23, 2024, so BEFORE the Iran conflict and DURING the Biden lame-duck period.


10 posted on 05/12/2026 8:14:10 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Act of war? By whom?

As the article points out, the Russian ship was trying to SECRETLY shipped banned nuclear propulsion technology to North Korea.

Good riddance!!!


11 posted on 05/12/2026 8:15:25 AM PDT by canuck_conservative (Russia lies all the time Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Ah. Ok. Anything went back then. Maybe the Russians sank it by mistake.


12 posted on 05/12/2026 8:17:44 AM PDT by HYPOCRACY (There is no gravity. The earth just sucks. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Orca attack.


13 posted on 05/12/2026 8:26:31 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

If it was a secret transport, and if the cargo was small submarine size nuclear reactors and if the destination was North Korea, then whoever attacked the ship did the world a favor.


14 posted on 05/12/2026 8:30:52 AM PDT by Wuli (ui)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY
Idiots. They share a friggen border. Thank God they suck.

It's only 14 hours by truck from Vladivostok to Pyongyang.

15 posted on 05/12/2026 8:38:27 AM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HYPOCRACY

—”Maybe the Russians sank it by mistake.”

At the time, there was speculation that the Russians sank it to avoid delivery to the Norks.


16 posted on 05/12/2026 8:39:48 AM PDT by DUMBGRUNT ( "The enemy has overrun us. We are blowing up everything. Vive la France!"Dien Bien Phu last messag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

“Act of war? By whom?”

That is the question, indeed.

USA, UK, Iran, or Russia are known to have the tech.

I would assume it’s not Iran or Russia, although, as noted, some believe Russia did it to avoid delivery.

Maybe it was FOB Russia and the Russians did this to stick the Norks with the bill. I wouldn’t put it past the Russians to defraud the Norks and Lloyds of London.


17 posted on 05/12/2026 8:45:05 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Sometimes There Is No Lesser Of Two Evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson