Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The upper middle class is now the largest income group in the US
CBS News via MSN ^ | April 6, 2026 | Aimee Picchi

Posted on 04/07/2026 5:20:20 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia

The U.S. middle class is shrinking, but not because more Americans are poorer. Instead, more households are climbing into the echelons of the upper middle class due to income gains in recent decades, according to research from the nonpartisan American Enterprise Institute.

About 31% of U.S. households earn enough to be considered upper middle class, a roughly threefold increase since 1979, making it the nation's largest economic group, the research found. Meanwhile, the share of Americans in the "core" and "low" middle class segments has declined over that time, primarily because more households in those income groups have jumped ahead economically, AEI found.

The findings underscore a broader shift in the U.S. economy: As more households move up the income ladder, consumer demand is tilting toward higher-end goods and services. The so-called "K-shaped" economy — in which higher-income consumers are spending more while lower-income households pull back — has become a hallmark of the post-COVID economy.

"The whole distribution of Americans, from poor to rich, has done better over time. And to the extent that fewer people are within a fixed income range that we might think of as middle class, that's just because everybody's gotten richer over time," Scott Winship, a co-author of the report and a senior fellow at AEI, told CBS News.

The analysis, based on U.S. Census data, analyzed family incomes between 1979 and 2024, with the last year in the study representing the most recent available data.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: economy; middleclass; uppermiddle
Message from Jim Robinson:

Dear FRiends,

We need your continuing support to keep FR funded. Your donations are our sole source of funding. No sugar daddies, no advertisers, no paid memberships, no commercial sales, no gimmicks, no tax subsidies. No spam, no pop-ups, no ad trackers.

If you enjoy using FR and agree it's a worthwhile endeavor, please consider making a contribution today:

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you,

Jim


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2026 5:20:20 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I always find it funny that they focus on income when making these lists.

most wealth is held in assets.

many billionaires take no salaries at all, and would be considered poor by this measure for instance


2 posted on 04/07/2026 5:23:27 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

So what actual incomes determine middle class and upper middle class?


3 posted on 04/07/2026 5:23:29 AM PDT by redfreedom (The Forth Estate is the Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom
From the article:

The shift means that the upper middle class — which AEI defines as households earning between $153,864 and $461,592 for a family of four — now constitutes the largest income group in the U.S. The share of rich households now makes up 3.7% of the nation's households, or about 12 times higher than in 1979, the think tank found.
4 posted on 04/07/2026 5:25:05 AM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia (Democrats: The perfect party for the helpless and stupid, and those who would rule over them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

The number of households with between $1 million and $10 million has also gone up in the past 10 years. Even younger households, which have not had decades to build up wealth may be in the $500K to $1 million area.


5 posted on 04/07/2026 5:32:36 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

TAX THE UPPER MIDDLE CLASS! Doesn’t have the same ring to it.


6 posted on 04/07/2026 5:38:56 AM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user

I agree. All I see around are upper middle class couples and families. I don’t know of any making less than six figures in my church or circle of friends and acquaintances.


7 posted on 04/07/2026 5:39:29 AM PDT by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Maybe so….but $100K isn’t what it used to be…


8 posted on 04/07/2026 5:44:52 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wny

Around here $100K is barely scrapping by.


9 posted on 04/07/2026 5:47:44 AM PDT by Sirius Lee ("Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

The upper middle class is now the largest income group in the US.

Somebody has to do or everybody is poor that stinks.


10 posted on 04/07/2026 6:01:54 AM PDT by Vaduz (NEVER TRUST A DEMOCRAT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sirius Lee

I recently read a column explaining how the current poverty rate (originally defined as the minimum needed to function in society) for a family of four is really $130,000 or so to function in todays society, not the 30-something thousand government figure. Unfortunately I can’t remember where I saw it or all the specific details.

The base line for comparison was the mid 60s, maybe 50 years ago. The example from the piece I do recall is the phone bill. Fifty years ago the typical phone bill was $5 a month. Inflation (“official”) since then brings that to $55 a month or so. But to function in today’s society, one really needs a smart phone due to many needs for duo-authentication for banking, websites, etc. So today’s monthly phone bill is typically $100 or more.

The piece went through many such examples to arrive at the minimum $130,00 level needed. The argument made a lot of sense.


11 posted on 04/07/2026 6:03:21 AM PDT by wny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: wny

That’s crazy.
People in poor countries live on few hundreds of $ a year.
And they still live!
I figured out, one can really live on $1000 a year, even in the US!


12 posted on 04/07/2026 6:23:08 AM PDT by AZJeep (sane )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

3.7% is the largest income group? I hardly see how that can be true.


13 posted on 04/07/2026 6:40:14 AM PDT by Sequoyah101 (Opinions and belly buttons, everybody has one and they get to show them if they want to.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

And that is exactly who is making the rules. Income is for chumps


14 posted on 04/07/2026 6:41:20 AM PDT by 03A3 (If we can defund the police, we sure as hell can defund the FBI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

31% have the net worth to be deemed upper middle class


15 posted on 04/07/2026 6:42:10 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. +12) Quid Quid Nominatur Fabricatur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

In my view, what separates the middle middle class from the upper middle class is financial discipline. I’m not trying to say that a lack of upward mobility is a character flaw, so don’t even try it. But what I think is that many middle middle class can build a solid net worth and a decent retirement nest egg if they stop financing things they cannot afford and start making a real effort to increase their net worth.

As a boomer in my late 60s I contend that next to uncontrolled spending and it’s accompanying debt, a huge mistake my fellow boomers make is turning on social security at age 62 or 63.72% of US households have zero to $49,999.00 saved and 36% turn on SS at 62-63. Those of that 32% who have less than $50K saved but for whatever reason think it smart to start collecting SS at 62 or 63 must secretly hate themselves.

My daily work commute is 100 miles round trip. Up until January I drove a 2012 Ford Escape 4 cyl that by the end of the year had 230,000 miles on the clock. How many of us justify buying a brand new car every 4 years because we have ourselves convinced that anything older and with a few miles on it is unsafe and unreliable? One example of how the middle middle shoots iteslf in the foot, many others exist.

Oh, and by the way, I’m 68 still making that 500 mile per week commute in a cash car, plan on taking SS at 70 and already have the upper middle class designation and did it on a middle middle class income. The thing that helped us the most was being debt free and paying off our mortgage when our friends told us we should invest the extra money, which they didn’t do for themselves and are stuck in the middle middle. Good times.


16 posted on 04/07/2026 7:26:48 AM PDT by fatboy (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Once the Communist Party USA! takes back power, this statistic will likely change...and fast.


17 posted on 04/07/2026 7:39:02 AM PDT by lgjhn23 ("On the 8th day, Satan created the progressive liberal to destroy all the good that God created...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 03A3

What if you don’t have the income & very little property or other assets? Inflation hits our group pretty hard. Never got anywhere working & sure don’t do much now that I’m retired, either, but I get by & what happens in this world isn’t the end of the line. Having Jesus Christ as Lord & Savior is of REAL importance.


18 posted on 04/07/2026 8:30:25 AM PDT by oldtech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

I believe the 3.7% refers to the group above the upper middle class.


19 posted on 04/07/2026 8:33:14 AM PDT by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: oldtech

How many 60-somethings pull the plug on employment intending to fund their retirement on nothing but social security proudly proclaim that “health is wealth” then go on to complain that health care is too expensive, so they pass on it until it no longer can be ignored?


20 posted on 04/07/2026 9:03:42 AM PDT by fatboy (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson