The Supreme Court Seems Ready to Make ELECTION DAY Great Again. Thank God.

PJ Media ^ | 03/23/2026 | Victoria Taft

[SeekAndFind]

There's a reason reporters capitalize the words Election Day in their stories, why Election Day is on every American calendar, and why it is emblematic of a single day by which you must deliver your ballot to the vote counters. The problem is, a dozen U.S. states have all sorts of cockamamie rules for when voters must get their ballots into the elections office, and it turns out that Election Day is not that day. On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court appeared to be leaning in favor of making Election Day great again — or at least making it a day again.

Oral arguments were heard on Monday that both embrace and reject the notion that there's a day on the books in America called Election Day. The nine justices heard from both sides, and while there was the usual partisan Democrat cheerleading from Justice Sonia Sotomayor and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, and to a lesser extent Justice Elena Kagan, throwing shade on that old-fashioned idea about Election Day, based on the reactions of the more conservative members of the court, Americans may not have to endure seemingly never-ending election days again, based on those conservative court members’ questions for lawyers.

Justice Sam Alito asked lawyers what Election Day means.

He also noted that getting "radically different" vote tallies in the days after Election Day undermines the confidence people have in the integrity of elections. The elections in Nevada and Arizona in 2020 come to mind.

We know why the left has systematically changed Election Day deadlines throughout the country. If they could, they'd start the next election period the day after the previous election.

---

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; mailinballots; scotus

[aquila48]

If your goal was to cheat, you’d create a system like we have today.

[Political Junkie Too]

After the 2020 election, the Democrats actually changed the US Code to allow for endless counting after election day.

Title 3 § 2 prior to December 29, 2022:

3 U.S. Code § 2. Failure to make choice on prescribed day

Whenever any State has held an election for the purpose of choosing electors, and has failed to make a choice on the day prescribed by law, the electors may be appointed on a subsequent day in such a manner as the legislature of such State may direct.

The Democrats repealed this statute after the January 6 2001 protests. Their bill did two things:

1. Made it harder to challenge the Electoral College certificate from the states.

2. Eliminated the power of state legislatures to appoint their own Electoral College members if the result of the vote was not determined on Election Day.

-PJ

[Ronaldus Magnus III]

Just wait.

If the Supreme Court rules in favor of common sense election rules, some Federal Judges will ignore it and make their own rulings.

These “Judges” believe President Trump is an illegitimate President, so they can rule however they feel.

Judge Boasberg, and those Federal Judges suffering from Boasbergers Syndrome will put nationwide injunctions in place.

[ModelBreaker]

“If your goal was to cheat, you’d create a system like we have today.”

Motor voter.
Drivers Licenses for illegals
Mail in voting.
Keep counting until the D wins.