Posted on 03/09/2026 1:44:02 AM PDT by texas booster
After Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart signed off on the Biden administration’s illegal raid on Mar-a-Lago, conservatives flagged the former prosecutor’s work for Jeffrey Epstein.
Reinhart had begun setting up his legal practice while the Epstein plea deal was being negotiated and he went to work for Epstein the day after he left the U.S. Attorney’s office and approximately half a year after the dubious federal plea deal had been handed to Epstein.
A complaint filed by a lawyer for the victims to then U.S. Attorney Wifredo Ferrer, a Janet Reno protege out of the Clinton administration, claimed that, “within months after the non-prosecution agreement was signed”, Reinhart opened a criminal defense law office on the same floor as Epstein’s lead criminal defense lawyer that was located next door to Epstein’s ‘Florida Science Foundation’ which the sex offender used to bring in girls while on ‘work release’ from prison.
The letter charged that Reinhart’s work for Epstein involved “the exact same crimes and same evidence being reviewed by the U.S. Attorney’s office when he was employed there.”
But the media shot back that Reinhart was a “respected figure” and the former prosecutor claimed that he had not been involved in Epstein’s criminal case and had “never learned any confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter”. However the complaint cited statements from the U.S. Attorney’s office that he had “learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein matter” while working in the office and had “discussed the Epstein matter with another Assistant U.S. Attorney working on the Epstein matter.”
(Excerpt) Read more at frontpagemag.com ...
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Considering the nature of the ‘employees’, this wasn’t much of a defense. Kellen and Marcinkova had been listed as “unindicted co-conspirators” in the federal deal. A deposition in the Epstein Files of a woman whose name was redacted and was represented by Reinhart has him encouraging her to plead the Fifth to virtually any question about Epstein.
But it gets worse.
The release of the Epstein Files exposed a direct exchange between Epstein and Reinhart in which Epstein sent Reinhart an email asking him to find the probation officer of a “federal absconder”.Reinheart did not ask Epstein why he wanted to locate this particular woman.
Despite being well aware of Epstein’s history and legal troubles, Reinhart emailed the sex offender to say that “my inside source is waiting to hear back from knowledgeable people.”
The House Judiciary Committee can subpoena Judge Reinhart, force him to testify about his work for Epstein, and impeach him for ‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors.’ There is a misconception that this represents a high bar, but historically it does not. The first impeachment of a federal judge had him charged with ‘High Crimes and Misdemeanors’ for drunkenness on the bench. If those charges could clear the bar under Madison and Jefferson, anything can.
Another of the Deep State revolving door in the judiciary. And Congress should remove him.
Ping out to the Daniel Greenfield Ping! list.
As always, please FReepmail me if you want on or off the esteemed Daniel Greenfield ping list.
Daniel Greenfield's website: The Sultan Knish blog
Reinhart has a punchable face.
When they raided Mar-a-Lago, they were most likely looking for the Epstein blackmail tapes.
Those are the only things they’re afraid of.
if you don’t think so, watch this... pay attention to her flippant responses to certain questions and the almost bored behavior of her lawyers... UNTIL 03:54:27 when Rep Boebert brings up the life insurance folder. That’s when they go nuts.
then they go off the record. the topic not to be brought up again.
https://youtu.be/jiTVGhMVkpY?t=13760
The thing to remember is... the clintons had been in the company of a world class blackmailer for at least 5 years.
THAT folder contains some pretty damaging material.
So the question is...
were hillary and bill both COMPROMISED... and if so, is that why the chinese got everything they wanted (ChinaGate and the basement server)
How many others are similarly compromised?
This isn’t about diddling little kids. This is about national security.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.