Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 02/26/2026 4:18:23 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Actor Crispin Glover, most well-known for playing the iconic role of George McFly in arguably one of the greatest films of all time, Back to the Future, now faces allegations of battery and fraud in a new lawsuit filed by an unnamed woman who claims he “essentially held her captive and used her for sex and free labor.”
Anyone who has followed Glover’s career, both on screen and off, probably won’t feel surprised by the allegations. The guy has always been an oddball. Do a quick YouTube search of his late-night talk show appearances and you’ll see exactly what that means. Or watch his legendary dance scene from Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter, which was the fourth film in the franchise and not, in fact, the actual final chapter.
According to “Jane Doe,” Glover, 61, allegedly “lured and manipulated Jane Doe into abandoning her home and belongings in the UK for work with him as his assistant in the entertainment industry.”
She claims he promised her a home and a job if she returned with him to Los Angeles. At some point, a person has to take responsibility for their own naivety. Did she not insist on putting this agreement in writing and having an attorney authenticate it? Moving from one country to another for a job offer seems like the kind of arrangement you would want documented.
“But when Ms. Doe took the bait, uprooted herself, and moved to Los Angeles, she entered a disturbing situation in which Mr. Glover sought to control her actions, track her whereabouts, and essentially force her to serve him as a live-in girlfriend and sex slave,” court documents revealed, according to Fox News.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Was he peeping at her with binoculars when he fell out of a tree? Did he say to her “you are my density “?
Actually, this has come up on Reddit before. Someone always asks, "What actor is most likely to turn out to have some really dark skeletons in his closet?" And whoever mentions Crispin first gets thousands of karma points.
The story reported sounds like what Marilyn Manson was accused of about three years ago.
It’s hard to tell what’s true, when both sides seem somewhat eccentric.
“Not that there’s anything wrong with that!”
That's in the wife handbook, no?
Well, Crispin Glover’s character Willard Stiles in the film Willard (2003) is widely understood as an oddball, socially misfit, psychologically fragile figure. He played the role PERFECTLY.
In fact, Crispin Glover is known for playing eccentric, off‑center characters, and Willard is often cited as one of his most quintessentially strange roles. IndieWire explicitly groups Willard among Glover’s “oddball characters,” describing him as a “mouse‑loving social misfit.”
Who knows? Maybe he did not really need to act at all...
I’ve personally heard verions of this tale a couple times. It must be quite common: An American guy bring a women over to the US from abroad and once she gets here the woman decides she doesn’t want to do the “work” required. He should have put her on the first plane back home when their “arrangement” ended.
“Sex slave”. Was she locked in a room? Chained up? Did she engage in consensual sex for a period of time before or during her “job” in the US?
If she was a ‘personal assistant’ I imagine she made many phone calls, trips and errands. She likely had many opportunities to ask for help or simply walk or run away. “He tracked her whereabouts” - like, an app on her phone? She could have deleted it or turned it off.
The dude may be a total creep and manipulator, and she may have been drawn into the allure of stardom, Hollywood and living in the US as a personal assistant, but “sex slave” seems a bit extreme.
It’s pure “click-bait” not to edit the title of this thread and add the name of the actor in question.
If you’re making money off the ‘clicks,’ that’s one thing. If you’re posting for the edification of your fellow Freepers, there’s no excuse not to.
That’s the title published. Isn’t it against FR rules to alter it?
Armie Hammer breathes a giant sigh of relief. He's lucky they didn't ask about really dark skeletons in his freezer.
RE: It’s pure “click-bait” not to edit the title of this thread and add the name of the actor in question.
Am I allowed to edit the title to add things to it?
I’m copying the moderator to ask for his clarification.
RE: Isn’t it against FR rules to alter it?
That was my question too. See Post #17.
Some on FR just like to shoot the poster.
Memo to Jane Doe: it has been called a casting couch for generations. Grow up and go home.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.