Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas dropped straight TRUTH BOMBS in his dissent on the tariffs He nailed it.
X ^ | Eric Daugherty

Posted on 02/20/2026 12:25:13 PM PST by cuz1961

BREAKING: SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas dropped straight TRUTH BOMBS in his dissent on the tariffs He nailed it.

"NEITHER the statutory text nor the Constitution provide a basis for ruling against the President." "Congress authorized the President to “regulate . . . importation.” Throughout American history, the authority to “regulate importation” has been understood to include the authority to impose duties on imports." "The meaning of that phrase was beyond doubt by the time that Congress enacted this statute, shortly after President Nixon’s highly publicized duties on imports were UPHELD based on identical language." "The statute that the President relied on therefore authorized him to impose the duties on imports at issue in these cases." "Because the Constitution assigns Congress many powers that do not implicate the nondelegation doctrine, Congress may delegate the exercise of many powers to the President." "Congress has done so repeatedly since the founding, WITH THIS COURT'S BLESSING."

(Excerpt) Read more at x.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: tarrifs

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last
https://x.com/EricLDaugh
1 posted on 02/20/2026 12:25:13 PM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Trump press conference on tarrifs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6CD_GyqWSA


2 posted on 02/20/2026 12:27:57 PM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Clarence Thomas will go down as one of the most brilliant justices in American history. As will justice Scalia.


3 posted on 02/20/2026 12:29:14 PM PST by Son-Joshua ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

.


4 posted on 02/20/2026 12:29:20 PM PST by sauropod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Son-Joshua

Thomas is amazing, simply the best


5 posted on 02/20/2026 12:30:22 PM PST by Sarah Barracuda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

The leftists have taken over SCOTUS. Roberts, Barrett are just marxist-light.


6 posted on 02/20/2026 12:30:29 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of scenery, wildlife and climbing, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president’s ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE

“SCOTUS made a president’s ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less.”

“There’s no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don’t think SCOTUS meant that!”

“Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs.”

“The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision.”

“Now, there’s no doubt.”

RT2:05

https://twitter.com/EricLDaugh/status/2024916005705728078?s=20


7 posted on 02/20/2026 12:31:52 PM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Q: “What did you mean a moment ago when you said The Supreme court was swayed by foreign interests?”

TRUMP: “Foreign interests are represented by people that I believe have undue influence... they have a lot of influence over the Supreme Court whether it’s through fear or respect or friendships I don’t know. But I know some of the people that were involved on the other side and I don’t like them... I think they are real slime balls. You’ve got to do what is right for the country... what is right for the Constitution.”

RT3:21
https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/2024924761877283121?s=20


8 posted on 02/20/2026 12:33:23 PM PST by cuz1961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

The deep state strikes America again. Now what? This SCOTUS ruling against Trump’s tariffs may well cause the US to go broke but they’ll do anything to crash President Trump.


9 posted on 02/20/2026 12:33:40 PM PST by drypowder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

The fact that they held it to announce it just before the State of the Union says it all.


10 posted on 02/20/2026 12:35:17 PM PST by Eli Kopter (Wherever you are, that is where you are supposed to be...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

5-D chess, anyone?


11 posted on 02/20/2026 12:36:16 PM PST by reasonisfaith (What are the personal implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

It’s clear to me that Clarence Thomas should be the chief justice of the SC, not the boneheaded John Roberts.


12 posted on 02/20/2026 12:36:17 PM PST by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man, but it's okay... I wasn't married to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961
Also from Eric Daugherty on X:

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent just STUNNED the "Experts," he and Trump have been making big plans and it's FULL-STEAM AHEAD

Tariff revenue will be *unchanged* in 2026. Boom.

"Let's be clear about what today's ruling WAS and what it WASN'T. Despite the misplaced GLOATING from Democrats, ill-informed media outlets, and the very people who gutted our industrial base, the Court did not rule against President Trump's tariffs."

"Six justices simply ruled that IEEPA authorities cannot be used to raise even $1 of revenue."

"This administration will invoke alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs."

"We will be leveraging Section 232 and Section 301 tariff authorities that have been validated through thousands of legal challenges."

"Treasury's estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority, combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026."

13 posted on 02/20/2026 12:36:31 PM PST by UnwashedPeasant (The pandemic we suffer from is not COVID. It is Marxist Democrat Leftism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

Beautiful isn’t it. I remember posting today in a few other threads on this ruling it will not turn out like many thought and tariffs will not go away.

I remember saying it was limited only to the IEEPA and they basically did not rule out the president using tariffs, here we are :)


14 posted on 02/20/2026 12:36:38 PM PST by Skwor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Saint Athanasius

ping


15 posted on 02/20/2026 12:39:55 PM PST by rhinohunter (I don’t know if God is a Republican, but I am metaphysically certain that satan is a democrat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz1961

I agree it is part of the Presidents duties. Why declare an emergency to do it?


16 posted on 02/20/2026 12:46:00 PM PST by kvanbrunt2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant
"This administration will invoke alternative legal authorities to replace the IEEPA tariffs."

"We will be leveraging Section 232 and Section 301 tariff authorities that have been validated through thousands of legal challenges."

"Treasury's estimates show that the use of Section 122 authority, combined with potentially enhanced Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs, will result in virtually unchanged tariff revenue in 2026."

If all of what is being said here is true, then why the hell didn't they go down that path in the first place? They *had* to know there would be legal challenges to thwart the tariffs.

17 posted on 02/20/2026 12:50:29 PM PST by CatOwner (Don't expect anyone, even conservatives, to have your back when the SHTF in 2021 and beyond.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bullish
"...It’s clear to me that Clarence Thomas should be the chief justice of the SC, not the boneheaded John Roberts..."

100% Bullish. 100%.

I have long since concluded that Roberts is compromised, financially, or though some sexual preference or act. Or, he may just be a Leftist all along.

I admit I am universally disgusted with female justices in the Supreme Court. All of them who have ever existed...both Leftist and "conservative" ones. Note the scare quotes around "conservative".

18 posted on 02/20/2026 12:53:02 PM PST by rlmorel (Factio Communistica Sinensis Delenda Est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Eli Kopter

Trump should skip the SOTU...it’s not mandated.


19 posted on 02/20/2026 12:56:07 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: UnwashedPeasant

O.K. Scott Bessent, then why didn’t you and the other Trump admin finance and econ fellows advise Trump to simply use those other straight away legal options to begin with, and avoid the courts challenge over the rarely used emergency authority.


20 posted on 02/20/2026 12:57:12 PM PST by Wuli ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson